

Nagios Core and Auvik Network Management compete in the network monitoring category. Auvik seems to have the upper hand due to its intuitive interface and comprehensive support, making it suitable for users of varying technical expertise.
Features: Nagios Core is valued for its flexibility and the extensibility provided by a large ecosystem of plugins. It supports distributed monitoring and robust alerting capabilities, making it a reliable infrastructure monitoring tool. In contrast, Auvik stands out with features like visual network mapping, automated network discovery, and real-time monitoring. Its remote management and user-friendly interface enhance accessibility.
Room for Improvement: For Nagios Core, enhancements in user interface and configuration processes are desired to make it more accessible to non-experts, along with GUI configuration options and dynamic updates. Auvik could improve its network map clarity and customization options, address performance lags, and enhance integration with third-party tools to refine alert management settings.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios Core typically involves on-premises installation, demanding manual configuration management and a reliance on community support due to the lack of official customer service. Auvik offers a cloud-based solution that simplifies installation with automated discovery and a central management interface, backed by professional customer support and technical assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Nagios Core is cost-effective as it eliminates licensing fees, offering a high ROI by minimizing server downtimes without software costs. Auvik, however, uses a per-device pricing model which can quickly add up with larger networks. While more expensive, the operational efficiencies and time-saving features justify the cost for many users who value automation and comprehensive support.
Auvik Network Management has definitely helped reduce business disruptions related to network issues.
Auvik Network Management saves me 40% to 50% of our time.
If the network goes down, Auvik Network Management (ANM) opens a ticket, and then we begin working on it.
They were knowledgeable and responded quickly with accurate and useful information.
They introduced the product to us and explained how to deal with it.
I would give Auvik Network Management support a ten out of ten.
The platform scales well and supports our organizational needs.
It was capable of handling all those clients perfectly.
We keep adding sites into Auvik Network Management, and it doesn't seem to affect performance or anything on our end.
The solution is scalable.
I would rate the stability of Auvik Network Management (ANM) a perfect 10 because I have never found any problems.
A lot of platforms, especially when it comes to CRMs, CMSs, and ERPs, are still built on PHP and MySQL, which I feel is archaic now and slow to query.
In terms of stability, I would rate Auvik Network Management as a ten out of ten, as it does not experience jitter or other major issues.
I tried many other solutions at work, however, in terms of Nagios, I haven't seen any disruption or downtime.
We were unable to integrate Auvik with a geographical map, which limited our ability to track issues to specific buildings on campus.
Enhancements in API functionality and wider tool support for integration with PSA or RMM tools.
Auvik does a good job of nesting those devices. For example, a bunch of different servers will all be nested in one icon on the map, and when opened up, all those multiple servers can be seen.
Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.
The pricing for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is great; it is comparable to other solutions, and for what it does, it actually provides more value for the money than some of the other major competitors.
Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing or licensing is about 2,500 per year for approximately 4,000 endpoints, which is quite reasonable.
Auvik Core's ease of use also enhanced troubleshooting speed and efficiency.
Its proactive monitoring and simplified troubleshooting have significantly impacted our efficiency in handling network management tasks.
We can go to different places and monitor, check, configure, and analyze traffic.
You can monitor anything.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Auvik Network Management (ANM) | 1.2% |
| Nagios Core | 1.9% |
| Other | 96.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 141 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
Auvik Network Management provides comprehensive network monitoring with competitive pricing, offering advanced features and free management of non-critical devices.
Auvik Network Management is known for its intuitive interface and real-time network visibility. Users benefit from features like automated network discovery, mapping, alerting, and TrafficInsights for cost-effective bandwidth monitoring. Its integration with ConnectWise and ticketing systems enhances device inventory updates, SNMP monitoring, and network troubleshooting. However, improvements are needed in reporting, integration capabilities, network map accuracy, customization, and alert configuration. Users suggest expanding device support and improving navigation and monitoring features.
What are Auvik's most important features?Auvik Network Management is widely used by managed service providers and enterprises for network monitoring across industries. It enables efficient management of firewalls, switches, routers, and ensures connectivity over multiple locations. This solution aids in identifying issues, automating backups, and facilitating remote access, offering critical insights on network traffic and device performance. Companies leverage its features to enhance network management and performance.
This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.