Avast Business Hub vs HP Wolf Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Avast Software and HP are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Avast Software is ranked #47, while HP is ranked #20. Avast Software holds a 1.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to HP’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Avast Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of HP users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Avast Business Hub are robust security solutions that compete in the cybersecurity arena. Avast Business Hub appears to have the upper hand due to its intuitive management and extensive endpoint protection.

Features: HP Wolf Security offers advanced threat detection, comprehensive protection capabilities, and user-friendly design. Avast Business Hub provides intuitive management, extensive endpoint protection, and competitive security features.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security needs a more streamlined experience, fewer false positives, and better integration capabilities. Avast Business Hub could improve integration capabilities, streamline system resource consumption, and enhance user interface consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is known for straightforward deployment and responsive support. Avast Business Hub features seamless implementation and highly regarded customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security offers competitive pricing and good ROI. Avast Business Hub is more expensive but users feel its extensive features justify the cost, offering higher perceived value.

To learn more, read our detailed Avast Business Hub vs. HP Wolf Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Avast Business Hub vs. HP Wolf Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Avast Business Hub is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 2.9%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
HP Wolf Security	2.9%
Avast Business Hub	1.0%
Other	92.3%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Anderson Jose

CEO at Premier Wired Solutions

Easy to scale, good reports, easy to install and has excellent support

It reduces network and bandwidth speed. We cope with our bandwidth in order to use it. The majority of the complaints we receive are about the PC running slower. The network is slower as a result of the increased bandwidth usage. I would like to see the reports simplified for those who are not technically minded. Some of these reports can be confusing, and I'd love to be able to send them to my clients. An IT person would be able to understand them, but a client who does not have an IT background would find it difficult. I would like the language should be easier for them to understand.

Read full review

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have found in our test Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to be a very good tool."

"The product is mostly automated, and we do not have to make decisions, because all the decisions are made by the product itself and we are not required to create any custom policies since the policies that are created are well defined in the product itself."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to other people."

"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."

"It collects and caches and the knowledge of machine learning from different customers to take to the cloud, it makes it better to use for everybody, it allows for quick learning and updates and can, therefore, offer zero-day malware security, and this sharing of metadata helps make the solution very safe."

"Palo Alto is the core of the security infrastructure in the environment."

"The solution allows us to gain remote access without the user's knowledge and take the necessary actions on the device."

"The product has an intuitive dashboard."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The solution is easy to use."

"The performance is good compared to other products that slow down the laptop, post-installation."

"The protection is very good."

"Previously, we were working with Norton, and we switched from Norton to Avast because we believe Avast is far superior and a better solution, especially for PC management."

"After installing Avast, this did not happen."

"It has increased productivity. IT threats are kept at a minimum because of this product."

"The installation was simple, and it did not take very long."

"It warns you if there is a threat and it's perfect because it runs in the background and doesn't interfere with anything."

More Avast Business Hub pros

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"It has reduced the number of virus and malware incidents and calls we have received compared to prior to deploying this product, and our overall security posture has improved."

"Bromium allows us to safely view images and quickly and safely surf our network so that we can take proper care of our patients efficiently, effectively, and expeditiously."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

More HP Wolf Security pros

Cons

"There are some default policies which sometimes affect our applications and cause them to run around."

"The dashboard is the area that needs to improve so that we can have the ability to drill down without having to go elsewhere to verify results."

"We would also like to have advanced tech protection and email scanning."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

"The downside to the solution is that there are a large number of false positives."

"If they had pulse rate detection, it would be better."

"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response."

"I recommend adding a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Making the price a bit cheaper would be an improvement."

"I would like to see better protection and more spyware included with the free version."

"The solution needs to be more secure and work to protect us better from people trying to mess with our systems."

"It could download faster during deployment."

"The accuracy of the scanner could be improved. Sometimes, it can turn a good file into a suspicious file."

"The solution could improve by providing more security."

"It should have proper and timely updates to deal with new viruses as they come onto the market."

"It could have a 10,000-feet overview of the whole infrastructure because the software is easily installable on the whole infrastructure and not just the infrastructure, but also the workstation themselves. I would love to have a 360 view of the whole network and basically see from where a test is coming, and if there is an instance in the cloud that is actually misbehaving or if there is a workstation that is infected and stuff like that. It can also have some kind of AI to detect all those things and then cut off the connection from that machine. In Cortex, you can link the logs, reports, and all that stuff. You can also see the full picture of when it happened, and you can trace it back all the way to a file or something else. I would like to see similar functionality in Avast Business Endpoint Protection."

More Avast Business Hub cons

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

More HP Wolf Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"It is $75 per license for a year. There are no additional costs."

"I am using the free version."

"If you become a partner, you will receive the wholesale price."

"We are on a monthly subscription for Avast Business Endpoint Protection."

"I am using the free version of Avast."

"There are no costs other than licensing."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 5% of the time

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 5% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 2% of the time

More Avast Business Hub Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 4% of the time

Kaspersky Next MXDR Optimum vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 2% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Internet Security

October 2026

Download Avast Business Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

October 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Bromium vSentry

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Avast Business Hub is designed for comprehensive endpoint protection across devices, providing robust security features like real-time protection and seamless integration with minimal impact on system resources.

Avast Business Hub offers endpoint protection to secure devices against viruses and malware threats. Users benefit from its ease of deployment, self-monitoring capabilities, and active real-time protection. The command center allows for clear reporting and integration with VPN services, while regular updates ensure strong defense. Users have highlighted areas for improvement, including network infrastructure overview, improved security, faster deployment, reduced false positives, and competitive pricing. Reporting clarity for non-technical audiences and improved segmentation for larger organizations are also desired, alongside better stability and lower bandwidth usage. The solution is effectively used to secure laptops, PCs, Macs, and Linux systems from internet threats and external devices, serving both B2B and B2C users.

What features make Avast Business Hub effective?

Ease of Deployment: Quick and straightforward installation across multiple devices
Real-Time Protection: Continuous scanning and threat detection to minimize risks
Self-Monitoring Capabilities: Automated processes ensure smooth operation without manual intervention
PC Patch Management: Ensures software is always up-to-date to prevent vulnerabilities
VPN Integration: Enhanced security through virtual private networks

What benefits should users expect from Avast Business Hub?

Scalability: Adaptable for businesses of different sizes without compromising performance
User-Friendliness: Simple navigation and intuitive design make it accessible for users
Minimal System Impact: High performance maintained without heavy resource consumption
Threat Detection: Proactive measures to keep software secure from emerging threats
Frequent Updates: Regularly enhanced features and protections

Many industries rely on Avast Business Hub for its robust antivirus capabilities, especially in environments lacking Office 365. It is often deployed for endpoint protection in companies focused on safeguarding devices from internet threats and external components. Regular updates and strong defense capabilities make it a preferred antivirus for a wide range of clients.

Avast Software

HP Wolf Security provides robust protection against malware and security threats by isolating untrusted content and offering a secure browsing experience. It combines high-performance protection with user-friendly operations, aiming to keep devices secure without hindering productivity.

HP Wolf Security focuses on preventing malware infections through content isolation. Its virtualized browser ensures high-risk activities do not lead to incidents by removing malware upon session closure. Features like LAVA alerts offer in-depth analysis, making management reporting more efficient. While adjustments are required for better Windows adaptation and broader browser support, it continues to offer significant security advantages. Compatibility challenges and resource usage during browsing and document tasks highlight areas for improvement.

What key features define HP Wolf Security?

Isolation Feature: Prevents malware infection by isolating untrusted content.
Secure Browser: Manages high-risk activities safely and removes threats post-session.
LAVA Alerts: Provides detailed analysis for enhanced management reporting.
Micro VM Protection: Office and PDF files are safely handled with reduced vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Seamless Usability: Combines security with user-friendly operations.
Enhanced Protection: Reduces vulnerabilities across different file types.
Cost-effective Solution: Offers significant security features at a competitive price.
Management Efficiency: Improved reporting and analysis for better decision-making.

In the healthcare sector, HP Wolf Security assists in processing large imaging files efficiently, important for radiology departments. It offers an additional safety layer for laptops in dynamic environments and is pre-installed on many devices, functioning comparably to Norton 360 for comprehensive endpoint protection.

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Benassi & Benassi, P. C.

Valspar

Buyer's Guide

Avast Business Hub vs. HP Wolf Security

September 2026

Free Report: Avast Business Hub vs. HP Wolf Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Avast Business Hub vs. HP Wolf Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avast Business Hub vs. HP Wolf Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.