Avepoint FLY vs Nasuni comparison

Read 36 Nasuni reviews

10,633 Views
1,914 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Avepoint FLY

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Nasuni and Avepoint FLY are competing products within the enterprise cloud storage and data management category. Avepoint FLY appears to have the upper hand in terms of features, which are crucial for deploying larger enterprises, while Nasuni offers solutions with a focus on cost-efficiency.

Features: Avepoint FLY offers advanced migration capabilities, integration tools, and automation features that support seamless transitions to cloud-based systems. Nasuni focuses on scalability, comprehensive data protection, and security features that ensure seamless data access and protection across multiple cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avepoint FLY provides an agile deployment model and exceptional customer support, simplifying large-scale migrations. Nasuni offers straightforward deployment and extensive support, ensuring smooth implementation and ongoing management.

Pricing and ROI: Nasuni provides competitive pricing with predictable costs, contributing to ROI through efficient data management. Avepoint FLY requires a higher initial setup cost but offers substantial long-term ROI due to its superior features and integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Avepoint FLY vs. Nasuni Report (Updated: November 2026).

Download the complete report

Avepoint FLY vs. Nasuni

November 2026

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avepoint FLY

Ranking in Cloud Migration

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nasuni

Ranking in Cloud Migration

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (3rd), NAS (14th), Cloud Storage (14th), Cloud Backup (30th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (20th), Cloud Storage Gateways (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of Avepoint FLY is 3.5%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nasuni is 5.2%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Avepoint FLY	3.5%
Nasuni	5.2%
Other	91.3%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Dave H

Technical Support Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Effortlessly manages large-scale data migrations and improves cost efficiency

There were some areas that could be improved with Avepoint FLY, particularly regarding an issue with the final reporting. While I cannot remember the exact issue, it was related to the final report concerning which files were migrated and what errors occurred. However, this could have been a user problem rather than an application problem.

Read full review

ShailenderSingh1

Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Unified cloud file storage has simplified global data management and reduced operational overhead

From an admin perspective, Nasuni has various valuable features. The GUI is very good, upgrading is very easy, and DFS is very easily manageable. Compared with other products, the snapshot feature is beneficial because it creates a snapshot every five minutes, allowing me to provide restores very easily to customers. Data protection is enhanced by the fact that Nasuni uses S3 technology to create snapshots every five minutes and enables versioning, so the snapshot is created and I can utilize that snapshot for disaster recovery or restore purposes. I assess the value of global file locking and caching for reducing latency as good, giving it a five out of five.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very straightforward to use. It's not overly difficult to figure out."

"Some of the best features with Avepoint FLY are that it is very easy to use, and the tool moves files quite quickly."

"The initial setup phase can be described as a very user-friendly one...The solution's technical support was good since they responded very promptly."

"The most valuable feature of AvePoint FLY is its ability to install or use multiple client servers using a single master server and balance the migration load depending on our needs."

"If a company is looking for something that is easy to use and not too complicated, this is perfect."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"Overall, it has been straightforward and we're very pleased with the Nasuni system."

"One of Nasuni's best characteristics is its fully redundant system; we don't have to shift tapes or use other backup solutions. It's a good, full-featured product."

"The features I find most valuable in Nasuni are the unlimited snapshots, antivirus capabilities, auditing, and ransomware protection."

"My advice for anybody who is considering this product is that it works great."

"We've used it to provide file source capacity for VDI environments. The security of it is important and the fact that it's object storage, it's immutable and that it can't be held for ransom. It's a lot smoother than our previous processes that weren't Nasuni-based. A lot of it is done automatically just by the system being in place."

"Nasuni offers us a single platform with a 360-degree view of our file data, which is definitely important to us. It simplifies IT operations tremendously. Because it is taking continuous snapshots, it eliminates a lot of work that was done previously when trying to manage backing up and restoring data files."

"The most important feature is that things are backed up automatically in AWS. We have a lot of remote sites where there is a tiny server onsite and, in a lot of cases, we really don't have to back them up because the data is automatically copied to AWS. The cloud replication is the most useful functionality for us."

"The feature I have found to be most valuable is the revision control of the files. If somebody deletes or accidentally makes a wrong change to files, we can go back to the revision history and restore the previous versions. That is a very good feature that we rely on."

More Nasuni pros

Cons

"There were some areas that could be improved with Avepoint FLY, particularly regarding an issue with the final reporting. While I cannot remember the exact issue, it was related to the final report concerning which files were migrated and what errors occurred."

"Right now, AvePoint FLY doesn’t provide us with help to identify the size of the mailed items for a certain period."

"The initial setup is a little bit more complex than setting up Cloud Backup for Avepoint."

"Technical support is lacking in that they don't seem to respond. I do a lot of research myself. I can't rely on them."

"The solution's reporting could be improved because it does not have a lot of reporting capabilities."

"Room for improvement would be the speed of replication of new files. I would also like to see cloud mirroring."

"We can recover if data and a Filer are lost because of a possible ransomware event, but even that takes time to recover."

"They could lower the cost, but it saves so much money when you go into it (by losing all the backup)."

"Customer support and response time on issues should be improved because their support can be hard to get in touch with and we have to wait for a long time to get a call back."

"Migration from existing systems, specifically StorSimple, could be improved, but that solution will be end-of-life by the end of the year. Also, the documentation could be more accessible."

"If you need performance with less latency, you should go with another solution."

"I would like to see Nasuni provide the ability to mirror a Nasuni appliance from one site to another. They could maybe have a standby appliance that is mirrored in a different location for disaster recovery purposes. We can recover if data and a Filer are lost because of a possible ransomware event, but even that takes time to recover. If we had the ability to have a mirrored appliance, we could flip over to that mirrored device and resume instantly rather than repopulate the local appliance with data from the snapshot history in the cloud. This is another feature that we would really like to see, if possible."

"One thing to consider is that Nasuni will have the same limitations that a traditional file storage solution will have, although that is because they are taking the place of a traditional architectural model. For example, Office 365 supports collaboration on documents such as Excel files and Word documents, but because Nasuni is a traditional file server, in that sense, it can't make use of that functionality."

More Nasuni cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AvePoint FLY's pricing is good enough for its capabilities."

"We are using the trial version and find it to be costly. It's something around $20. With another attachment, the cost was lower, at about $3. However, you seem to have to buy more licenses than you need."

"There are two different ways of licensing Avepoint FLY. So either you can use set up a licensing form based on objects which we do not recommend because then it will be more costly. So what you do is you set up the migration based on the users instead."

"The prices of the tool are neither low nor high, so it can be considered a moderately-priced product."

"Nasuni pricing is average; it's not too high or too low."

"There are annual costs that we pay for maintaining all of the snapshot history in the cloud. That is the primary cost that we pay. We occasionally buy newer Nasuni appliances or deploy them to new offices when the need occurs. That capital equipment expenses is less than the cost of buying new file storage systems. For the most part, you are trading a CapEx cost of storage equipment for an OpEx cost for management of all the snapshot data in the cloud."

"It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or compute to access the data. You also pay for the object storage. So, there are three parts to it. There is the Nasuni license per terabyte. You would also pay for the actual object storage in the cloud, and then you would pay for virtual machines to access the storage."

"Our agreement is set up such that we pay annually per terabyte, and we buy a chunk of it at a time. Then if we run out of space, we go back to them and buy another chunk."

"With this solution, the license renewal is pretty swift. With the virtual appliance, you just need to take care of the OS versions and patches. In a way, we don't have to struggle much with renewals because the only thing that we need to take care of are the licenses. We renew it every three years. This aspect goes with infrastructural costs because it doesn't cost us too much to maintain the solution."

"There are cheaper forms of storage, but Nasuni is fairly priced for the functionality it offers. I can get basic file shares provisioned in Azure and pay for the storage and the CPU. The overall cost would be much less than Nasuni, but I would need to build the management console and encryption process, so it would cost a lot to develop that kind of functionality."

"The cost is based on the capacity, which is approximately $100 USD per terabyte."

"The pricing is fair. It's an enterprise-level solution so it's not inexpensive... The cost is pretty stable year over year."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avepoint FLY?

My experience with the pricing and setup cost of Avepoint FLY was that it is very competitive and fairly priced. It was significantly cheaper than some of the alternatives I was exploring, such as ...

What needs improvement with Avepoint FLY?

What is your primary use case for Avepoint FLY?

The migration I was involved in with Avepoint FLY was for an oil and gas industry, specifically from a file server to SharePoint Online, and we moved approximately two terabytes of data.

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

Avepoint Migration Platform vs Avepoint FLY

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Xillio Content Migration vs Avepoint FLY

Compared 15% of the time

SkyKick Migrate vs Avepoint FLY

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudiway vs Avepoint FLY

Compared 13% of the time

More Avepoint FLY Competitors

CTERA Intelligent Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 8% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Datomia vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Product Reports

Download Avepoint FLY product report

Avepoint FLY

October 2026

Download Nasuni product report

October 2026

Overview

AvePoint FLY is a migration platform designed to streamline transitions for businesses by offering efficient tools for data transfer and project alignment with organizational goals.

AvePoint FLY specializes in facilitating seamless data migration for companies involved in mergers, acquisitions, and SaaS transitions. It effectively retains metadata, identifies file path issues, and maps projects. Users appreciate its ease of use, rapid file transfers, stable performance, and adaptable operations, making it advantageous for large-scale data movement.

What are the key features of AvePoint FLY?

Master Server Management: Install multiple client servers with one master server.
Load Balancing: Optimize migration load distribution effectively.
Metadata Retention: Maintain complete metadata during transfers.
Pre-Migration Assessment: Evaluate data before starting migration.
Path Length Identification: Detect and address file path length issues.
Project Mapping Tool: Align migration projects with business objectives.

What benefits should users expect from AvePoint FLY?

Ease of Use: Simple, user-friendly interface enhances migration efficiency.
Rapid File Transfer: Speeds up data transfer processes significantly.
Scalability: Supports large datasets without impacting performance.
Operational Flexibility: Offers adaptable migration methods and schedules.

AvePoint FLY is extensively implemented in industries such as oil and gas, facilitating significant dataset migrations from servers to cloud platforms like SharePoint Online. It is crucial in merging IT frameworks during acquisitions, automating transitions from Slack to Teams, and migrating email systems to Exchange Online, significantly aiding Managed Service Providers.

AvePoint

Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.

Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.

What are Nasuni's Key Features?

Seamless Data Transmission: Enables efficient data flow across locations.
Unified File System: Centralizes file management for ease of access.
Unlimited Storage Capacity: Offers scalable options with global access.
Data Protection: Continuous versioning and ransomware protection.
Single Management Console: Streamlines administrative tasks.

What Benefits Can Users Expect from Nasuni?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses by leveraging scalable architecture.
Data Accessibility: Enhances sync and access across multiple sites.
Improved Collaboration: Supports teamwork across dispersed teams.
Confidence in Data Security: Comprehensive encryption and private key management.

Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.

Sample Customers

Pure SEO

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital