No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Certificate Manager vs Certificate Lifecycle Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Certificate Manager
Ranking in Certificate Management Software
3rd
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Certificate Lifecycle Manager
Ranking in Certificate Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Certificate Management Software category, the mindshare of AWS Certificate Manager is 10.8%, down from 28.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Certificate Lifecycle Manager is 8.8%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Certificate Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Certificate Lifecycle Manager8.8%
AWS Certificate Manager10.8%
Other80.4%
Certificate Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Abiola Olaibi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior DevOps Engineer and Software Engineer
Automated certificate management has strengthened security and reduced operational overhead
There is always room for improvement for every product and service, and one aspect I can identify is the need for enhanced automation, especially for complex enterprise-scale renewal workflows, along with the need to expand integration capabilities for hybrid cloud environments, which is crucial for AWS Certificate Manager.The user interface of AWS Certificate Manager can definitely be designed to cater to complex integration capabilities, especially for hybrid cloud environments, making it easier for both senior and junior engineers to work easily. A modernized UI would streamline certificate lifecycle management along with clearer documentation, which is crucial for complex deployments and troubleshooting.
Deb Malya - PeerSpot reviewer
Section Head Cybersecurity at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Strong privileged access controls have protected critical sessions and improved credential oversight
The best features of CyberArk Certificate Manager include its robust privileged access management capability, session monitoring, and strong defense against threat vectors. PSM, PIM, and application legacy connectivity for CyberArk Certificate Manager are probably the best in the market. The real-time threat intelligence feature helps with preventing security breaches as it never allows any privileged access to get into the application until you check out the user ID and password, effectively managing credentials. It also includes MFA and session monitoring, tracking who is checking out the password and credentials, which are capabilities that cannot be bypassed, thus neutralizing threat protection. I use features like PSM, PIM, session monitoring, and everything else with CyberArk Certificate Manager.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AWS Certificate Manager provides central control of certificate lifecycle management, which helps to improve security."
"The most valuable features are definitely the alerts."
"The solution has an import dashboard where we can import the certificates or create new certificates."
"AWS Certificate Manager eliminates the operational overhead associated with manual certificate lifecycles, so we had continuous security and compliance."
"It offers encryption with specific algorithms for better management."
"It is easy to generate, easy to use, easy to integrate, and very cost-effective."
"CyberArk Certificate Manager is doing its best with multiple layers of security, and while they face challenges with legacy applications, they can still connect to web applications, rich applications, desktop applications, and cloud-native applications."
"Certificate Manager has reduced the certificate expiration outages to almost nil, and since 2022, we have had almost zero major incidents wherein we saw a financial impact or business disruption due to an expired certificate."
"Venafi takes care of automatically renewing and deploying your certificate so that you don't need to worry when it expires."
"Venafi's technical support is impressively fast."
"We use Venafi for PKI certificates."
"CyberArk Certificate Manager has positively impacted my organization as a powerful tool for enhancing the security certificate management process, and by automating the lifecycle of TLS and SSL certificates, it has improved security and ensured operational efficiency, making it a vital component of modern IT infrastructure management."
"It's definitely worth the money to have Venafi as a tool; it's definitely miles away from the competition, in my opinion."
"The best feature I appreciate about Venafi is its user interface, which allows me to search for any particular certificate and immediately see the certificate details and expiry."
 

Cons

"Maybe more integration with third-party certificate authorities would be useful."
"Better reporting features would be beneficial."
"One potential improvement could be enabling the extraction of the certificate as a file to be used outside of AWS, even with an additional charge."
"The AWS Certificate Manager's technical support team is sometimes unavailable."
"There is always room for improvement for every product and service, and one aspect I can identify is the need for enhanced automation, especially for complex enterprise-scale renewal workflows, along with the need to expand integration capabilities for hybrid cloud environments, which is crucial for AWS Certificate Manager."
"Currently, there is no option to customize beyond the default settings, and it would be beneficial to have the ability to customize certificates to fit specific requirements."
"In terms of areas for improvement, one thing that we did not appreciate about Certificate Manager was having agents on everything."
"The initial setup is complex. You need third-party support or support from CyberArk Certificate Manager if you do not have a lot of skillset inside your own company."
"The support from Certificate Manager needs improvement based on my experience. The response time needs improvement, and it takes too long to resolve or provide solutions for some tickets."
"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations. They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns."
"For Java applications, we currently convert the certificate in JKS manually. It would be helpful to have the capability to download certificates in JKS automatically."
"For the stability of the solution itself, I would rate it a seven."
"In terms of scalability, given that we were in the situation where it was on-prem, there were certain limitations there."
"Venafi's overall installation could be made easier."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This complexity can make our payments to Venafi challenging if costs continue to rise. It is good but more expensive than the competitors."
"Venafi's pricing appears to be competitive within the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Certificate Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AWS Certificate Manager?
While AWS Certificate Manager works well within AWS, one limitation is that it is tightly coupled with AWS services. Exporting certificates for use outside AWS is not straightforward unless you use...
What is your primary use case for AWS Certificate Manager?
My primary use case for AWS Certificate Manager is to manage SSL/TLS certificates for securing applications running on AWS services like Application Load Balancer, CloudFront, and API Gateway. In d...
What advice do you have for others considering AWS Certificate Manager?
My advice would be to use AWS Certificate Manager if you are already operating within AWS, as it simplifies certificate management significantly. I would also recommend using Route 53 for DNS valid...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?
In terms of pricing, they are a little costly, but they are the best in the market today, so I would say they are worth every penny, rating them again at seven or eight.
What needs improvement with Venafi?
CyberArk Certificate Manager can be improved, particularly in terms of integrations with other tools. I would like to see improvements in integrations with ID, Kerberos, or with other companies for...
What advice do you have for others considering Venafi?
Since using CyberArk Certificate Manager, I have seen specific outcomes such as a reduction in incidents because I can work with CyberArk Certificate Manager, where digital certificates are everywh...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Venafi
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Certificate Manager vs. Certificate Lifecycle Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.