Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Device Farm vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Tricentis are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in MTT, compared to Tricentis’s 33.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.
AWS Device Farm
Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews
  • 647 Views
  • 615 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
Tricentis Tosca
Read 112 Tricentis Tosca reviews
  • 22,598 Views
  • 4,520 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and AWS Device Farm are competitive products in the software testing domain. Tricentis Tosca has the upper hand in test automation, while AWS Device Farm is superior for real device testing, particularly in mobile applications.

Features: Tricentis Tosca provides model-based test automation, API testing integration, and robust cross-platform support. AWS Device Farm offers real-time testing, parallel test execution, and extensive real-device coverage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers a comprehensive deployment model with organized support. AWS Device Farm's cloud-based testing allows straightforward deployment but may have varied support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca involves a higher initial setup cost but enhances ROI through efficient test automation. AWS Device Farm's pay-as-you-go pricing offers a cost-effective entry, appealing for device-focused testing.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
6th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
Service Virtualization (1st), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 2.3%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 33.3%, up from 32.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11 - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance
The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.
Read full review
PrabhuKrishnamoorthy - PeerSpot reviewer
Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features
The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."
"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."
"The scriptless automation tool is one of the important features."
"The scriptless automation tool is one of the important features."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."
"Tricentis Tosca can be easily integrated with SAP infrastructure."
"The low code is the best feature."
"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."
"This tool is very easy to use and I think that anyone can come in, having no experience with it, and within four to six months be comfortable with it."
More Tricentis Tosca pros
 

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."
"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."
"Technical support used to be better. It is now a bit difficult to reach out compared to previous experiences."
"I would like a better user interface."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."
"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."
"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."
"Primarily I'm dealing with customers looking for a cheap solution, and they are willing to try open-source automation solutions. So from this perspective, the price of Tosca is not as competitive."
"The product is not very stable when used with cloud storage. It is very hard to load the screen, making it difficult to use the tool in cloud storage."
"Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It should improve the testing of legacy systems and interfaces."
More Tricentis Tosca cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."
"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."
"Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"There is an annual cost for Tricentis."
"​It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."
"It is expensive. There is also the training cost, but it does speed up the process. So, you get a return on investment."
"In terms of the licensing costs for Tricentis Tosca, we are spending more or less $70,000 per year. We have a very complex mechanism because there are some business users and some BI users, so the licensing structure is not simple, but support is included."
"My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."
More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm Logo
Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm
Compared 41% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs AWS Device Farm Logo
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs AWS Device Farm
Compared 32% of the time
More AWS Device Farm Competitors
Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 11% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 10% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 9% of the time
Testim vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Testim vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 8% of the time
UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 7% of the time
More Tricentis Tosca Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Mobile App Testing Tools
August 2025
AWS Device Farm reportDownload AWS Device Farm product report
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis Tosca
July 2025
Tricentis Tosca reportDownload Tricentis Tosca product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Orchestrated Service Virtualization
 

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?
  • User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
  • Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
  • Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
  • Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
  • Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.
What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?
  • Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
  • Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
  • Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
  • Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis
 

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Buyer's Guide
AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca
July 2025
Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.