AWS Device Farm vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.4% mindshare in MTT, compared to OpenText’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Device Farm

Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews

519 Views
472 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,471 Views
559 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

AWS Device Farm

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and AWS Device Farm compete in automated testing environments for mobile and web applications. OpenText stands out for its flexibility and customer support, whereas AWS Device Farm is ahead with its advanced features and reliability.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web supports various platforms with robust tool integrations, focusing on ease of use and environment customization. It offers notable flexibility in testing capabilities. AWS Device Farm prioritizes scalability and performance analytics, providing extensive device coverage and automation capabilities. It excels in handling large-scale testing scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ensures seamless deployment with strong customization options, supported by responsive customer service, which helps in quickly adapting to specific organizational needs. AWS Device Farm presents powerful features but may have a steeper learning curve during setup. Its customer service, though efficient, might lack a personal touch.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web provides flexible pricing models that can yield substantial ROI with tailored solutions, especially beneficial for organizations requiring high adaptability. AWS Device Farm's usage-based pricing can be cost-effective for high-volume testing but might lead to higher costs without strategic usage management. Each tool offers different value propositions based on organizational needs and budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 3.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 5.6%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	5.6%
AWS Device Farm	3.4%
Other	91.0%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11

Automation Test Lead at Cap Gemini

A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance

The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.

Read full review

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

"Using the existing enterprise tools, like UFT, or even if you want to go open source, you can use them and it's a real user-functional performance, we are able to achieve that."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Consumer Goods Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Non Profit

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 16% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 16% of the time

Eggplant Test vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 15% of the time

Kobiton Mobile Device Testing vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 13% of the time

More AWS Device Farm Competitors

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download AWS Device Farm product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

March 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

March 2026

Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.