OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Selenium HQ comparison

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Selenium HQ

Download the complete report

Helped 893,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

Selenium HQ

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Selenium HQ is 4.0%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Selenium HQ	4.0%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	94.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

NarendraKumar4

DevOps Lead at Illumifin India LLP

Automation revolutionizes testing efficiency and cost savings while ensuring smooth deployment

The challenges I faced while integrating Selenium HQ into my existing systems relate to historical data, which requires going back six years. I have to traverse if there were any challenges because I am sure if there were any, they must have been documented in our ALM documents. The multi-browser support of Selenium HQ impacts my testing process primarily since it is being used in Edge and Chrome browsers. It all depends on our customers. I haven't heard of any challenges with other browsers such as Opera or Mozilla Firefox, as these two browsers are what we primarily use. When we were doing these tests manually, it took several hours of effort, and those hours, when counted on the basis of person days, used to be maybe six or seven months of effort, which we can now do every day by running the pipeline. This has definitely saved a lot of money for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"The pricing is great."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The stability and performance are good."

"Selenium is a freeware tool, through which I am using Java for automating our project testing and with its feature grid and a different browser, I can do the functional testing."

"It is a straightforward application to learn."

"Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies."

"The solution is very easy to implement."

"It's one of the best tools I have worked on. It's a strong tool and a winner in functional testing and automation testing."

"I would recommend anyone thinking of implementing Selenium HQ to go for it - it fits into every format, depending on your time and skillset."

"It is compatible with and supports multiple languages, such as Java and Python. It is open source, and it is widely used."

More Selenium HQ pros

Cons

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"Selenium has problems with some objects."

"Handling frames and windows needs to be improved."

"We'd like to see some more image management in future releases."

"If there's a complex issue no one has faced, it may take a while to solve the problem."

"We use X path for our selectors, and sometimes, it is difficult to create locators for elements. It is very time-consuming because they're embedded deeply. A lot of that comes from the way that you architect your page. If devs are putting the IDs on their elements, it is great, and it allows you to get those elements super fast, but that's not necessarily the case. So, Selenium should be able to get your elements a lot quicker. Currently, it is time-consuming to get your selectors, locate your locators, and get to the elements."

"A drawback of Selenium is that it only focuses on web applications."

"Selenium HQ can improve by creating an enterprise version where it can provide the infrastructure for running the tests."

"Selenium only supports web based applications and it is not suitable for testing small sized products which can be easily tested manually."

More Selenium HQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"We are using Selenium open-source, so there is no need to purchase anything."

"Currently, Selenium HQ is free for customers."

"It is an open-source product, it is free for anyone to use."

"It is all free."

"It is free."

"It is an open-source tool."

"Selenium is an open-source product. It is free."

"It is an open-source solution."

More Selenium HQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Non Profit

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	33
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?

I will give an eight for my satisfaction with the pricing and licensing costs of Selenium HQ.

What needs improvement with Selenium HQ?

Some improvements can be implemented as compared to Playwright, which is why I rate it seven out of ten.

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Selenium HQ

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Selenium HQ

Compared 4% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Selenium HQ

Compared 4% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs Selenium HQ

Compared 4% of the time

SeleniumBox (SBOX) vs Selenium HQ

Compared 3% of the time

More Selenium HQ Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Selenium HQ

Download Selenium HQ product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

SeleniumHQ

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Selenium HQ, an open-source testing framework, is recognized for its ability to automate web testing across diverse environments. Its versatility in script customization and cross-browser support makes it a trusted tool for efficient automation testing.

Selenium HQ offers significant support for multiple browsers and programming languages, providing integration with CI tools and compatibility with frameworks like TestNG and JUnit. Users leverage its open-source nature for cost-effective testing and appreciate its scalability and flexibility for parallel execution. A vibrant community contributes to its continuous development. However, improvements are desired in performance-testing, parallel execution efficiency, and enhanced mobile device support. Users find it complex for those without development skills, with needs for better iOS automation and expanded reporting features.

What are the key features of Selenium HQ?

Open-source Nature: Allows cost-effective testing with community-driven enhancements.
Cross-browser Support: Provides automation across multiple browsers for comprehensive testing.
CI Integration: Seamless integration into continuous deployment and development pipelines.
Parallel Execution: Utilizes Selenium Grid for executing tests simultaneously on multiple environments.
Language Support: Compatibility with languages such as Java and C# for diverse testing scenarios.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost-effectiveness: Leveraging open-source tools reduces testing expenditure.
Flexibility: Adapts to different environments, increasing testing coverage.
Scalability: Easily scales tests in parallel, enhancing testing efficiency.
Community Support: Access to a broad range of resources and improvements from a vibrant community.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with tools like Jenkins and Cucumber, enhancing productivity.

Selenium HQ is widely adopted across industries for its comprehensive automation capabilities. Enterprises often employ it for UI and regression testing in web and mobile applications, integrating seamlessly with CI tools for a streamlined workflow. Its ability to automate API calls further enhances its utility across industry sectors.

SeleniumHQ

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Selenium HQ