Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Selenium HQ pros and cons

Vendor: SeleniumHQ

4.0 out of 5

113 reviews
89% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Selenium HQ is an open-source tool supporting Java, Python, and .NET, valued for web testing in complex projects. It integrates with various tools, allowing customization, while Selenium Grid enables parallel execution to reduce time. Despite its robust community and extensive resources, setup is complex, handling dynamic elements is challenging, and issues with Internet Explorer persist. Limitations include non-web app integration and a lack of built-in reporting, requiring external frameworks.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Selenium HQ supports multiple programming languages and integrates with various frameworks and tools.

The community support for Selenium HQ is comprehensive and easily accessible.

Selenium HQ is open-source, offering flexibility and customization without licensing restrictions.

Selenium HQ efficiently automates UI tests, reducing the time and effort of manual testing.

Selenium HQ is stable and widely used in the industry, making it a reliable choice for web testing.

CONS

Selenium HQ setup is complex and requires programming skills, making it less accessible for non-technical users.

Integration and support for Windows desktop applications is lacking, leading to reliance on third-party tools.

Selenium HQ does not have a robust test management or reporting framework, necessitating external solutions for advanced reporting and test management.

Locator management is challenging, with difficulties in adapting to changing elements, making test maintenance burdensome.

There are stability and compatibility issues, particularly with Internet Explorer, and coordination with multiple browsers can be problematic.

Selenium HQ Pros review quotes

MF

QA Automation Engineer at XPO Logistics

Jul 29, 2021

Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable.

Read full review

AB

Automation Tester at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Nov 3, 2021

For me, the most valuable feature of Selenium lies in its ability to help us find elements quickly. Apart from that, the driver interface is really useful, too. When we implement the Selenium driver interface, we can easily navigate through all of the pages and sections of an app, including performing things like clicking, putting through SendKeys, scrolling down, tagging, and all the other actions we need to test for in an application.

Read full review

reviewer1709871

Senior Project Engineer at Wipro

Nov 3, 2021

There are many useful features in Selenium that I like, and of the new features I particularly enjoy the Selenium Grid. With this, we can run many test cases in one go, and in one suite we can extract multiple results.

Read full review

Free Report: Selenium HQ Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Selenium HQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SG

Director Technology at Simplify 3x

Jul 22, 2020

What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do.

Read full review

reviewer1687902

Software engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 5, 2021

Selenium is the fastest tool compared to other competitors. It can run on any language, like Java, Python, C++, and .NET. So we can test any application on Selenium, whether it's mobile or desktop.

Read full review

Project Manager at Nalashaa

Sep 9, 2021

Data parametrization and parallelization are the most important features in any automation tool.

Read full review

NK

DevOps Lead at Illumifin India LLP

May 14, 2025

I do recommend Selenium HQ to other organizations because we are in a business that is primarily based on B2B interface.

Read full review

Director at Finding Technology Company

Apr 3, 2021

The solution is free to use.

Read full review

reviewer1736361

Senior Software Developer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

May 4, 2022

It's easy for new people to get trained on this solution. If we are hiring new people, the resource pool in the market in test automation is largely around Selenium.

Read full review

reviewer1664187

Software quality engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 3, 2021

My customer previously validated every file and it would take almost 15-20 minutes for a document. They used to randomly select and test only 100 out of the thousands, maybe 85,000, files, to pick up sampling. Each file would take around 20 to 25 minutes, so we were not able to do it manually, but with the help of Selenium, we were able to test all the files in two days. It saves a lot of time.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 83)

Selenium HQ Cons review quotes

MF

QA Automation Engineer at XPO Logistics

Jul 29, 2021

We use X path for our selectors, and sometimes, it is difficult to create locators for elements. It is very time-consuming because they're embedded deeply. A lot of that comes from the way that you architect your page. If devs are putting the IDs on their elements, it is great, and it allows you to get those elements super fast, but that's not necessarily the case. So, Selenium should be able to get your elements a lot quicker. Currently, it is time-consuming to get your selectors, locate your locators, and get to the elements.

Read full review

AB

Automation Tester at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Nov 3, 2021

One drawback to Selenium is that there is nothing like an object repository, such as that found in QTP, especially considering continuous integration practices that have become common nowadays.

Read full review

reviewer1709871

Senior Project Engineer at Wipro

Nov 3, 2021

For email-based applications, we can't automate as we would like to, making it necessary to bring in a third-party product to do so.

Read full review

Free Report: Selenium HQ Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Selenium HQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SG

Director Technology at Simplify 3x

Jul 22, 2020

Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be.

Read full review

reviewer1687902

Software engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 5, 2021

For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion.

Read full review

NK

DevOps Lead at Illumifin India LLP

May 14, 2025

Currently, we are using Excel as our data source. I don't know if we have that capability to provide different data sources such as SQL Server, CSV, or maybe some other databases, so that kind of capability would be great.

Read full review

Project Manager at Nalashaa

Sep 9, 2021

I continuously see failures in threads when it is running in parallel.

Read full review

Director at Finding Technology Company

Apr 3, 2021

For people that don't know about technology, maybe it's difficult to use.

Read full review

reviewer1736361

Senior Software Developer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

May 4, 2022

Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a lot of additional scripts required if you want to handle a single page application in a neat way.

Read full review

reviewer1664187

Software quality engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 3, 2021

Sometimes we face challenges with Selenium HQ. There are third party tools that we use, for example for reading the images, that are not easy to plug in. The third party add-ons are difficult to get good configuration and do not have good support. I would like to see better integration with other products.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 82)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Regression Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Selenium HQ

Katalon Studio vs Selenium HQ

OpenText Functional Testing vs Selenium HQ

BrowserStack vs Selenium HQ

SmartBear TestComplete vs Selenium HQ

BlazeMeter vs Selenium HQ

Sauce Labs vs Selenium HQ

Worksoft Certify vs Selenium HQ

LambdaTest vs Selenium HQ

Ranorex Studio vs Selenium HQ

Testim vs Selenium HQ

Parasoft SOAtest vs Selenium HQ

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Selenium HQ

ReadyAPI vs Selenium HQ

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Selenium HQ

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Regression Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Selenium HQ

Katalon Studio vs Selenium HQ

OpenText Functional Testing vs Selenium HQ

BrowserStack vs Selenium HQ

SmartBear TestComplete vs Selenium HQ

BlazeMeter vs Selenium HQ

Sauce Labs vs Selenium HQ

Worksoft Certify vs Selenium HQ

LambdaTest vs Selenium HQ

Ranorex Studio vs Selenium HQ

Testim vs Selenium HQ

Parasoft SOAtest vs Selenium HQ

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Selenium HQ

ReadyAPI vs Selenium HQ

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Selenium HQ

See all alternatives

Related questions

25

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

24

Cross-Platform Automated Testing Tool

134

Anyone have a good example of a Test Automation Business Case?

10

When evaluating Functional Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

67

What is the best automation tool to test dynamic data?

19

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

17

Tosca Testsuite Version 10.0

154

What is the best tool for SAP testing?

177

Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?

348

What are some common causes for software failure?