Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS IAM Identity Center vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.5% mindshare in IAMS, compared to IBM’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.
AWS IAM Identity Center
Read 12 AWS IAM Identity Center reviews
  • 1,377 Views
  • 757 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IBM Security Verify Access
Read 8 IBM Security Verify Access reviews
  • 2,277 Views
  • 934 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

IBM Security Verify Access and AWS IAM Identity Center are identity and access management solutions. Data comparisons show that AWS IAM Identity Center often has superior features, which justify its cost.

Features: IBM Security Verify Access includes robust security controls, flexible integration, and granular policy management. AWS IAM Identity Center offers seamless AWS service integration, strong governance capabilities, and a cloud-native design for enhanced flexibility and scalability.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Verify Access could improve its cloud-native capabilities, ease of use for smaller enterprises, and quicker setup times. AWS IAM Identity Center might enhance its integration outside the AWS ecosystem, provide more detailed customization options, and offer clearer guidance for non-AWS users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Verify Access provides customizable on-premises and cloud deployment models, offering control for tailored configurations. AWS IAM Identity Center features intuitive deployment within the AWS ecosystem, appealing for streamlined cloud adoption. Both have favorable customer service, with AWS providing more comprehensive cloud-focused resources.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Verify Access may involve higher upfront setup costs due to its hybrid model but could yield substantial ROI for enterprises needing detailed control. AWS IAM Identity Center presents competitive pricing with a lower initial investment, making it attractive for cost-efficiency and rapid deployment. Its alignment with AWS platforms offers greater long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS IAM Identity Center vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
AWS IAM Identity Center vs. IBM Security Verify Access
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS IAM Identity Center
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
8th
Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Security Verify Access
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
15th
Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
17th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (17th), Access Management (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of AWS IAM Identity Center is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS IAM Identity Center1.5%
IBM Security Verify Access2.1%
Other96.4%
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

MO
Kteams Michael
Web developer at King of CMS Consulting
Centralized access control has improved team collaboration but still needs a simpler onboarding
One of the best features AWS IAM Identity Center offers is the permission set, which is one of the best. Then there are the temporary credentials via SSO, the multi-account governance, and the centralized identity management. Those are good features that I believe assist developers, and another feature I can say is one of the best is the improved security with temporary credentials. The feature I find myself relying on the most day-to-day would be the centralized identity management and multi-account governance. It allows me to check what other developers are doing and since I am the admin, I can also revoke the access they have to the AWS accounts.
Read full review
Ateeq Rehman - PeerSpot reviewer
Ateeq Rehman
Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited
Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies
I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The features of AWS IAM Identity Center that I appreciate are single sign-on and multi-factor authentication, and we can manage all authentication aspects while integrating it with third-party applications."
"The solution enhances security through features like multifactor authentication."
"The two most valuable features of IAM Identity Center are the security policy generation and automation in creating credentials."
"IAM provides significant benefits when properly deployed."
"Overall, IAM Identity Center is a great service, currently rated at nine out of ten."
"The product is easy for beginners to learn and use."
"AWS IAM Identity Center has helped our organization by providing a unified dashboard to manage permissions and access controls."
"The most valuable features of AWS IAM Identity Center are role-based permissions and existing permissions templates."
More AWS IAM Identity Center pros
"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."
"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."
"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."
"IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."
"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."
"It's a good solution for identification and access management."
"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."
"IBM Security Verify Access, formerly known as ISAM, IBM Security Access Manager, now renamed to ISVA, integrates with central directory services for our organization and provides user management functionality."
More IBM Security Verify Access pros
 

Cons

"The AWS Identity Center's user interface could be improved to provide a clearer understanding of how the system operates."
"I would like to see more flexibility in the features as sometimes it doesn't meet my expectations."
"Focusing on further allowing customization and flexibility in developing solutions as a solution architect or developer would enhance user experience."
"The initial setup isn't very easy, around four on a scale of one to ten. It permits setting up policies that might not be entirely secure if improperly configured, which can lead to issues later."
"I think AWS IAM Identity Center can be improved by making it beginner-friendly. It was very hard for me to navigate initially because the UI was very complicated."
"The configuration with other tools can be hard."
"Greater visualization for security policies would be beneficial."
"There is a desire to see integration or adoption of time-based user creation features within AWS IAM Identity Center."
More AWS IAM Identity Center cons
"IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."
"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."
"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."
"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."
"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."
"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."
"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."
"IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."
More IBM Security Verify Access cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cheap since it is available on the cloud."
"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."
"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."
"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Insurance Company
12%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS IAM Identity Center?
The product is easy for beginners to learn and use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS IAM Identity Center?
AWS provides the lowest pricing among other service providers like Azure, Google, Oracle. It is cost-effective, and they use a pay-as-you-go model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS IAM Identity Center?
I think AWS IAM Identity Center can be improved by making it beginner-friendly. It was very hard for me to navigate initially because the UI was very complicated. I had to do a lot of research and ...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?
The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?
I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM Security Access Manager?
We are still using the IBM BPM platform to automate the processes for our organization.I generally use Microsoft Project for project planning and schedule management, especially in relation to Orac...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs AWS IAM Identity Center Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs AWS IAM Identity Center
Compared 13% of the time
Auth0 Platform vs AWS IAM Identity Center Logo
Auth0 Platform vs AWS IAM Identity Center
Compared 9% of the time
Okta Platform vs AWS IAM Identity Center Logo
Okta Platform vs AWS IAM Identity Center
Compared 8% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs AWS IAM Identity Center Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs AWS IAM Identity Center
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Active Directory vs AWS IAM Identity Center Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs AWS IAM Identity Center
Compared 5% of the time
More AWS IAM Identity Center Competitors
Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 10% of the time
Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 9% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 6% of the time
IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 5% of the time
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 3% of the time
More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
AWS IAM Identity Center
March 2026
AWS IAM Identity Center reportDownload AWS IAM Identity Center product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Verify Access
March 2026
IBM Security Verify Access reportDownload IBM Security Verify Access product report
 

Also Known As

AWS Single Sign On, AWS SSO
IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM
 

Overview

AWS IAM Identity Center is the recommended service for managing your workforce's access to AWS applications or your multiple AWS accounts (or both). It is a flexible solution that can be used to connect your existing identity source or help you create users in AWS. IAM Identity Center can be used alongside your existing AWS account access configurations.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
POST Luxembourg
Buyer's Guide
AWS IAM Identity Center vs. IBM Security Verify Access
March 2026
Free Report: AWS IAM Identity Center vs. IBM Security Verify Access
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS IAM Identity Center vs. IBM Security Verify Access and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS IAM Identity Center vs. IBM Security Verify Access report.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.