

AWS WAF and NGINX App Protect compete in the web application firewall market. AWS WAF has an edge due to its integration and cloud-native benefits, particularly appealing to AWS cloud users.
Features: AWS WAF's integration with AWS, automated rules management, and cloud-native flexibility are notable features. NGINX App Protect is valued for its command-line interface flexibility, control over HTTP sessions, and robust traffic management.
Room for Improvement: AWS WAF could improve its automation and bot protection, and simplify its complex billing model. Users also cite the need for improved DDoS features and third-party integration. NGINX App Protect could benefit from better integration with F5 technologies, enhanced bot protection, and simplified licensing and pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS WAF's cloud-native orientation allows for seamless deployment across AWS environments, although support quality varies. NGINX App Protect offers versatile deployment options across different infrastructure settings, with some users reporting a need for improved support responsiveness and guidance.
Pricing and ROI: AWS WAF's pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective, though extensive usage may lead to high expenses. NGINX App Protect is more expensive but aligns with market offerings, providing high security quality that may not suit budget-tight enterprises.
With AWS WAF, it is easier for us to block unwanted malicious DDoS attacks and threats from coming into our web application.
Resolving issues can take time because the support personnel may lack product expertise, leading to delays.
They reach out when you send them a ticket, and within 24 hours or less, someone is able to get back to you to solve your problem.
They were quick and efficient when we had issues.
AWS WAF does scale in the sense that it is fully managed and has automatic scaling.
Since it protects web applications from common attacks such as SQL injection and XSS, it is very stable.
We faced issues with AWS WAF when writing the custom rules.
In terms of reliability, I would rate AWS WAF about six out of ten due to the need for improved signature sets.
It is a quality solution, and I would rate its stability as eight out of ten.
If it's a bot, we should differentiate the requests, whether they are automated or not.
Compared to firewalls, WAFs generally provide limited stateful analysis capabilities.
AWS WAF can be improved if the dashboard is enhanced in such a way that everything will be displayed automatically without you going in there to see what is going on.
There was more information from F5 regarding hardware requirements and specifications to deploy the service.
The licensing cost for AWS WAF is just pay-as-you-go; it is a service-based model.
Due to our status as an AWS shop, AWS WAF is cost-effective for us, and we benefit from discounts due to our extensive use of AWS services.
The biggest benefit of AWS WAF for us is to filter malicious requests, so we can protect our environment and application from malicious actors.
It has also helped to improve the posture of our application, prevent all DDoS attacks, and unnecessary traffic and SQL injection that is reducing the performance of our application.
AWS WAF is not stateful, it offers a time-saving solution with its custom rulesets that enhance security and simplify management.
The most valuable feature is the ability to operate in a DevOps environment and to be configured through API and pipeline by the developers themselves.
Detecting bots and blocking IPs have proven effective for securing applications.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS WAF | 5.8% |
| NGINX App Protect | 2.0% |
| Other | 92.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a firewall security system that monitors incoming and outgoing traffic for applications and websites based on your pre-defined web security rules. AWS WAF defends applications and websites from common Web attacks that could otherwise damage application performance and availability and compromise security.
You can create rules in AWS WAF that can include blocking specific HTTP headers, IP addresses, and URI strings. These rules prevent common web exploits, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting. Once defined, new rules are deployed within seconds, and can easily be tracked so you can monitor their effectiveness via real-time insights. These saved metrics include URIs, IP addresses, and geo locations for each request.
AWS WAF Features
Some of the solution's top features include:
Reviews from Real Users
AWS WAF stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its user-friendly interface and its integration capabilities.
Kavin K., a security analyst at M2P Fintech, writes, “I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through.”
NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:
NGINX App Protect offers:
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.