Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs IBM API Connect comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #32, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Axway holds a 1.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

1,575 Views
1,559 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

Read 76 IBM API Connect reviews

6,620 Views
6,421 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

IBM API Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and Axway AMPLIFY API Management compete in the API management category. IBM API Connect appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive lifecycle management and integration with IBM services.

Features: IBM API Connect offers robust security gateways, GUI-based API development, OAuth support, holistic API management, and integration with IBM products like DataPower Gateway. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is strong in security, handling large data volumes, and providing governance. It efficiently manages APIs across different systems and offers a competitive pricing model.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect could improve integration with Exchange Server, ease of setup, monetization, stability, and documentation. Axway AMPLIFY API Management should aim to enhance scalability, microservices support, usability, installation simplicity, and customer support. IBM's proprietary tools can limit flexibility, whereas Axway focuses on deployment and service improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products provide versatile deployment options: on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud. IBM API Connect receives mixed reviews for customer service, with reports of slow response times. Axway, though having less available data on customer service, offers a streamlined deployment process. IBM's global deployment caters to diverse operational needs, while Axway prioritizes centralized solutions.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect is considered expensive with its complex pricing structure, but its integration capabilities justify the cost for large operations. Axway offers a competitive yearly subscription model with full feature access, attracting budget-conscious users. Both solutions promise ROI, though IBM might deliver a higher return due to its extensive governance and security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM API Connect

Ranking in API Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 6.0%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM API Connect	6.0%
Axway AMPLIFY API Management	1.6%
Other	92.4%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Sudhanshu Singh

Associate Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

We get stability, scalability, and security

Axway provides good documentation that newcomers can easily follow, but I believe the initial setup would be tough for someone new. Experienced employees know where everything is and how to do their job, so it would be difficult for a new hire to get up to speed. For an experienced person, I give the initial setup a ten out of ten. Deployment can be considered a hundred lines of code and some a thousand lines. For a simple deployment, it takes 10-15 seconds. And if the environment connectivity is good enough to respond and there is some heavy code that is being deployed, it takes around 30-60 seconds max, if we are referring to the cloud, where the connectivity for the long duration of the calls is there. The total deployment time is one minute to finish up. From the industrial point of view, Europe has a major chunk of users followed by, the US, and then Australia or the Asia-Pacific region.

Read full review

Shanmugasundaram Shanmuganathan

Solutions Architect at Synechron

Offers basic API orchestration and provides robust security and governance features

While Azure API Management offers configurable scalability, IBM API Connect relies on Kubernetes clusters. This might seem manual and require defining cluster instances upfront, but it's completely customizable and not on-the-fly scaling. It's completely custom-driven, not on-the-fly scaling, which some may consider cumbersome. Overall, I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. Almost all applications we've been exposing lately go through this middleware, so it's used extensively. There are around sixty applications directly using it, but six Kubernetes clusters serve those applications. It's heavily used for integration, including system-to-system integration and product integrations. Our usage has been increasing year-on-year based on our needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."

"This platform can be highly scalable."

"In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

"WSRR is a powerful component for getting the endpoints."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it protects our backend system. We are exposing services to external parties and using this solution to protect the backend system, and to have a navigation in between."

"The solution offers a pretty good SLA."

"The most valuable feature of IBM API Connect is the security of the protocol."

"The services that I consume through IBM API Connect are beneficial. It can handle multiple API management."

"IBM API Connect is a good product, and their technical support is excellent."

"It allows enterprises to expose some of their tech to outside stakeholders."

"Scalable and stable API platform for creating and managing APIs."

More IBM API Connect pros

Cons

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

"The portal still has room for improvement."

"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

"The monetization of the API could be improved. The pricing for the consumer is also very important to improve this solution."

"The implementation of IBM API Connect is complex, as it's an enterprise solution with many components that require more than one person. It's not a single product that you work on, and this is an area for improvement, but normally, it's good. Having a more structured model for IBM API Connect support is also room for improvement that would help customers better."

"The design time setup has a lot of customizable fields, but we need certain standard fields to be added, such as what all of the consuming systems are. This needs to be very clearly articulated during the design time."

"The only disadvantage I can see is that it requires heavy hardware support."

"The implementation process could benefit from improvements, as it may take some time to become accustomed to the deployment."

"Possible improvement is mainly around having more of the cloud oriented architecture bringing stability in adding new capabilities around security."

"Due to bugs in integration, we have to look for workaround on fixing and using DataPower as gateway."

"We have encountered challenges with IBM API Connect, particularly during significant upgrades. These upgrades demand substantial labour and financial resources, including consulting services from IBM. I'd like to see increased flexibility, more frequent updates with new features, an efficient upgrade process, and additional AI capabilities for future releases."

More IBM API Connect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"It can be quite expensive. It's okay for large-scale usage but quite expensive for smaller-scale implementations."

"It is expensive when compared to other products in this class. There were no extra fees for add-ons or technical support."

"It's an expensive product."

"API Connect is expensive - I'd rate their pricing five out of ten."

"The pricing is too expensive with IBM. Sometimes, we prefer to go with an open source or something more lightweight."

"API Connect's license cost could be a little lower. But, unfortunately, there aren't many open-source API gateways. Ideally, some new developers could come up with a minimum-functionality open-source solution."

"The price of the solution is expensive. However, there are a lot of customization capabilities."

"I haven't seen anyone go from on-premise to the cloud. In fact, I am seeing people go from the cloud to on-premise because the costs can quickly grow on the cloud."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Insurance Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

The solution has a yearly subscription. The solution’s pricing is competitive. Axway makes a significant impression compared to its peers, especially with a sensitive budget. In many instances, it ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Axway's queuing messages could be enhanced.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

We use the solution for ESB and B2B integration between the systems of our business.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

Pricing depends on how many instances run across environments. I don't deal with licensing, but compared to other IBM products, the licensing is not significantly higher.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

When comparing API Gateway with DataPower Gateway, several features in DataPower Gateway are absent in the APIC layer. Examples include the lack of connectivity to MQ ( /categories/message-queue-mq...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 28% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 6% of the time

SwaggerHub vs IBM API Connect

Compared 1% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

September 2025

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

September 2025

Download IBM API Connect product report

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

No data available

Overview

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

IBM API Connect is an API management tool providing robust security, seamless REST and SOAP conversion, and flexible deployment options for diverse cloud environments. It aids organizations in securing and monetizing their APIs while streamlining the development process.

IBM API Connect offers features like a security gateway, API lifecycle management, and integration with DataPower. Its intuitive interface enhances ease of use, supporting extensive analytics and traffic management. However, there are areas for improvement in automation, system integration, and user configuration. Organizations can deploy API Connect on-premises or in the cloud, delivering secure access control and analytics for banking, financial services, and government sectors. Compliance with standards like PSD2 ensures secure external API exposure and integration with multiple systems.

What are the most important features of IBM API Connect?

Security Gateway: Provides robust protection and data security for APIs.
Seamless Conversion: Facilitates easy conversion between REST and SOAP protocols.
API Management: Supports full API lifecycle management for efficient development.
DataPower Integration: Integrates seamlessly with DataPower for enhanced functionality.
Developer Portal: Offers a user-friendly interface for managing APIs and developers.
Analytics: Delivers powerful insights through comprehensive API analytics.
Flexible Deployment: Supports deployment on different cloud platforms for versatility.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from IBM API Connect?

Traffic Management: Efficiently manages high volumes of API traffic without compromising performance.
Data Protection: Ensures data is protected during API communication.
API Monetization: Facilitates API monetization strategies to drive revenue.
Scalability: Provides scalable solutions to handle growing demands seamlessly.

In specific industries like banking, financial services, and government sectors, IBM API Connect plays a crucial role in API management, orchestration, and regulation tasks. It provides secure access, control, and compliance with industry standards, serving as an essential gateway for data exchange and integration across multiple systems.

IBM

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect

September 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.