Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs IBM API Connect comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #32, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Axway holds a 1.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews
  • 1,579 Views
  • 1,563 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
IBM API Connect
Read 79 IBM API Connect reviews
  • 6,218 Views
  • 5,907 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and Axway AMPLIFY API Management compete in the API management category. IBM API Connect appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive lifecycle management and integration with IBM services.

Features: IBM API Connect offers robust security gateways, GUI-based API development, OAuth support, holistic API management, and integration with IBM products like DataPower Gateway. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is strong in security, handling large data volumes, and providing governance. It efficiently manages APIs across different systems and offers a competitive pricing model.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect could improve integration with Exchange Server, ease of setup, monetization, stability, and documentation. Axway AMPLIFY API Management should aim to enhance scalability, microservices support, usability, installation simplicity, and customer support. IBM's proprietary tools can limit flexibility, whereas Axway focuses on deployment and service improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products provide versatile deployment options: on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud. IBM API Connect receives mixed reviews for customer service, with reports of slow response times. Axway, though having less available data on customer service, offers a streamlined deployment process. IBM's global deployment caters to diverse operational needs, while Axway prioritizes centralized solutions.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect is considered expensive with its complex pricing structure, but its integration capabilities justify the cost for large operations. Axway offers a competitive yearly subscription model with full feature access, attracting budget-conscious users. Both solutions promise ROI, though IBM might deliver a higher return due to its extensive governance and security capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Ranking in API Management
32nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM API Connect
Ranking in API Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 5.0%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM API Connect5.0%
Axway AMPLIFY API Management1.6%
Other93.4%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Sudhanshu Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Sudhanshu Singh
Associate Software Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We get stability, scalability, and security
Axway provides good documentation that newcomers can easily follow, but I believe the initial setup would be tough for someone new. Experienced employees know where everything is and how to do their job, so it would be difficult for a new hire to get up to speed. For an experienced person, I give the initial setup a ten out of ten. Deployment can be considered a hundred lines of code and some a thousand lines. For a simple deployment, it takes 10-15 seconds. And if the environment connectivity is good enough to respond and there is some heavy code that is being deployed, it takes around 30-60 seconds max, if we are referring to the cloud, where the connectivity for the long duration of the calls is there. The total deployment time is one minute to finish up. From the industrial point of view, Europe has a major chunk of users followed by, the US, and then Australia or the Asia-Pacific region.
Read full review
SM
Sairathish Murugesan
Works at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Have addressed performance challenges while benefiting from flexible subscription models and reliable user access
To improve IBM API Connect, based on customer experience, you could work on latency. You can increase scalability and availability. If you're connecting with any other cloud, it connects to the infrastructure which needs to be managed with the customers and cloud providers, so if you have a setup, we can handle it easily. I have faced latency issues on the server, related to our management. If you need to stabilize your server based on peak traffic, you need to configure the scalability model. You need to know when traffic peaks, so use auto-scaling when traffic comes. If the application is not in use, the value should be zero, and it starts from zero. Based on customer experience, the value will increase, and when there is no customer servicing, the peak would be reduced, making the value remain zero. Following this approach, you should be able to optimize costs and satisfy customer experience.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This product is a ten when it comes to API management."
"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."
"This platform can be highly scalable."
"The administration tool for this solution is good."
"We like the portal for documentation a lot."
"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."
"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."
More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros
"The most valuable feature of IBM API Connect is the security of the protocol."
"One of the most valuable features is that we can seamlessly and harmoniously expose our capabilities, from a security point of view."
"The best features IBM API Connect offers in my experience are the middleware capabilities, as it can connect the front end, and you can be more secure using JWT tokens with IBM API Connect."
"It has all of the tools that are needed for the specific mission."
"The functionalities on offer are very good."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"It acts as a central gateway for both external APIs and underlying systems. It's basically a central middleware for hosting APIs to the internet and consuming APIs from internal systems. It provides central governance for any APIs going outside the network, ensuring security and a common contract for API definitions."
"The management of the API and API portal is good."
More IBM API Connect pros
 

Cons

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."
"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."
"The portal still has room for improvement."
"Team management capabilities could be improved."
"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."
"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."
"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."
"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."
More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons
"The only disadvantage I can see is that it requires heavy hardware support."
"They seem to have left out a feature for microservices and also a certification module for OIDC."
"Our main pain points are in these two areas: creating a better developer portal and improving stability in terms of synchronization and monetization."
"IBM info-center help documentation also needs improvement. Competitive product like Apigee provide out of the box policies to run Javascript, JAVA and better/flexible logging policies."
"The monetization of the API could be improved. The pricing for the consumer is also very important to improve this solution."
"The installation was difficult with the IBM toolkit."
"The implementation of IBM API Connect is complex, as it's an enterprise solution with many components that require more than one person. It's not a single product that you work on, and this is an area for improvement, but normally, it's good. Having a more structured model for IBM API Connect support is also room for improvement that would help customers better."
"I would like to see support for non-Java based services. We struggle a bit to be able to deploy and connect our .NET services because of things like data types. We had to map a couple of things. For one solution provider, we had to move them to .NET Core before we could use it properly. I would like to see more agnostic tool service platforms rather than moving it more towards Java or open source."
More IBM API Connect cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."
"It would be a good idea to bring down the pricing by at least 20 to 30 percent."
"The price of the solution is very expensive, it can turn many customers away."
"It is quite an expensive product."
"It can be quite expensive. It's okay for large-scale usage but quite expensive for smaller-scale implementations."
"It is an expensive solution. The licensing model is based on a per-subscription and per-subscriber end-user basis, meaning the price is determined by the end-users of the platform."
"API Connect is expensive - I'd rate their pricing five out of ten."
"The price for IBM API Connect is reasonable. It's $20,000 to $30,000 yearly for a subscription, and the pricing could vary around $40,000 per year, per subscription. Its price is reasonable for customers who have around sixty million API calls yearly for unlimited environments."
"IBM API Connect could be cheaper."
More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Insurance Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Insurance Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise61
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM API Connect?
Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?
I do not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing details.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?
We are relatively new to IBM API Connect, so I do not have significant improvements to suggest at this time.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 15% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 10% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 8% of the time
Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 7% of the time
More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors
IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect Logo
IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect
Compared 31% of the time
Apigee vs IBM API Connect Logo
Apigee vs IBM API Connect
Compared 17% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect
Compared 11% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect
Compared 5% of the time
WSO2 API Manager vs IBM API Connect Logo
WSO2 API Manager vs IBM API Connect
Compared 1% of the time
More IBM API Connect Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Axway AMPLIFY API Management
January 2026
Axway AMPLIFY API Management reportDownload Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM API Connect
January 2026
IBM API Connect reportDownload IBM API Connect product report
 

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management
No data available
 

Overview

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

IBM API Connect is an API management tool providing robust security, seamless REST and SOAP conversion, and flexible deployment options for diverse cloud environments. It aids organizations in securing and monetizing their APIs while streamlining the development process.

IBM API Connect offers features like a security gateway, API lifecycle management, and integration with DataPower. Its intuitive interface enhances ease of use, supporting extensive analytics and traffic management. However, there are areas for improvement in automation, system integration, and user configuration. Organizations can deploy API Connect on-premises or in the cloud, delivering secure access control and analytics for banking, financial services, and government sectors. Compliance with standards like PSD2 ensures secure external API exposure and integration with multiple systems.

What are the most important features of IBM API Connect?
  • Security Gateway: Provides robust protection and data security for APIs.
  • Seamless Conversion: Facilitates easy conversion between REST and SOAP protocols.
  • API Management: Supports full API lifecycle management for efficient development.
  • DataPower Integration: Integrates seamlessly with DataPower for enhanced functionality.
  • Developer Portal: Offers a user-friendly interface for managing APIs and developers.
  • Analytics: Delivers powerful insights through comprehensive API analytics.
  • Flexible Deployment: Supports deployment on different cloud platforms for versatility.
What benefits and ROI can users expect from IBM API Connect?
  • Traffic Management: Efficiently manages high volumes of API traffic without compromising performance.
  • Data Protection: Ensures data is protected during API communication.
  • API Monetization: Facilitates API monetization strategies to drive revenue.
  • Scalability: Provides scalable solutions to handle growing demands seamlessly.

In specific industries like banking, financial services, and government sectors, IBM API Connect plays a crucial role in API management, orchestration, and regulation tasks. It provides secure access, control, and compliance with industry standards, serving as an essential gateway for data exchange and integration across multiple systems.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz
Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank
Buyer's Guide
Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect
December 2025
Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect
Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.