Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management comparison

Google and Axway are both solutions in the API Management category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Axway is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0. Google holds a 14.2% mindshare in APIM, compared to Axway’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Axway users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 86 Apigee reviews

20,170 Views
15,653 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

2,004 Views
1,470 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Apigee

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apigee and Axway AMPLIFY API Management are competitive products in the API management category. Apigee has the upper hand in terms of developer tools and analytics, while Axway stands out with its governance and security features.

Features: Apigee offers a robust Developer Portal, Smart Docs, and comprehensive Monetization options, making it ideal for generating diverse revenue models with APIs. Its API Analytics provides detailed usage data and business insights. Additionally, Apigee excels in API lifecycle management and security features. Axway AMPLIFY API Management features strong security, efficient handling of high data volumes, and effective API governance for reliable API management.

Room for Improvement: Apigee struggles with role-based access management, integration complexity, and documentation quality. The initial setup can be cumbersome, and users desire better webhooks support and developer portal experience. Axway AMPLIFY API Management needs improvement in setup complexity, scalability, and customer support responsiveness. Customers also seek enhanced marketing and data products, improved API mocking tools, and a simplified installation process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee provides a range of deployment options including Public, Private, On-premises, and Hybrid Cloud. Its technical support receives mixed reviews, with some users content but others criticizing the responsiveness for on-premises setups. Axway AMPLIFY API Management supports similar deployment models and is noted for potentially costly support engagements, but its stability and consistency in customer service, provided the setup is clear, are generally well-regarded.

Pricing and ROI: Apigee is often viewed as expensive, particularly with complex licensing structures that can be a downside for small to medium businesses. However, it delivers significant ROI for large enterprises through robust API management and monetization opportunities. Axway AMPLIFY API Management, while also considered expensive, offers competitive pricing options and complete feature access with a license, often seen as more cost-effective for smaller budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (8th)

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apigee is 14.2%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

ShawkyFoda

Senior Consultant at Goverment

Provides high visibility and control with good traffic monitoring

Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability. The replication process between Master and Slave for disaster recovery takes too long. Dependencies on analytics impact the performance of the user interface, which should be separate. The complex setup process on-premises, especially with multi-node installations, could also be improved. Additional control in product declarations, based on operations like POST and GET, is needed.

Read full review

Sudhanshu Singh

Associate Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

We get stability, scalability, and security

Axway provides good documentation that newcomers can easily follow, but I believe the initial setup would be tough for someone new. Experienced employees know where everything is and how to do their job, so it would be difficult for a new hire to get up to speed. For an experienced person, I give the initial setup a ten out of ten. Deployment can be considered a hundred lines of code and some a thousand lines. For a simple deployment, it takes 10-15 seconds. And if the environment connectivity is good enough to respond and there is some heavy code that is being deployed, it takes around 30-60 seconds max, if we are referring to the cloud, where the connectivity for the long duration of the calls is there. The total deployment time is one minute to finish up. From the industrial point of view, Europe has a major chunk of users followed by, the US, and then Australia or the Asia-Pacific region.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm still evaluating, but in terms of overall performance and stability, it's quite good."

"The most valuable feature of the current version of Apigee, such as Apigee Edge, is that the maintenance and scalability of the service are not our responsibility. As a SaaS platform, Google takes care of it, ensuring the system is stable. Another valuable feature is the ability to customize the platform extensively. We can add JavaScript functionality to cater to any use case that is not available out of the box."

"The initial setup was easy - there was an onboarding document with steps that we followed."

"The features I found most valuable are how the APIs are published, the whole process of finalizing the API, and then controlling it."

"I have not encountered instability with the product."

"Apigee's best features are flexibility and breadth of capabilities."

"Apigee makes proxy management very simple."

"I use it because it's simple, it automatically updates, and It hasn't given me any issues."

More Apigee pros

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"This platform can be highly scalable."

"In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers."

"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

Cons

"The entire user across all the layers should be singly authenticated through an external authentication system."

"An area for improvement would be to provide more information while troubleshooting."

"Google isn't enthusiastic about supporting older versions. Google is now trying to move all of its clients to X within the cloud."

"Areas like traffic handling of incoming requests, security features between third-parties and Apigee, and between Apigee and internal network servers, resources, or JSON areas, etc."

"Proxy versioning seems a bit confusing/buried in the publishing experience, especially for the URI-based versioning approach."

"Since it is based on various open sourced projects, we might have to depend on the fixes provided by those components rather than Apigee directly fixing the issues."

"Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability."

"We are experiencing issues with automation; the production in Apigee is quite time-consuming."

More Apigee cons

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

"Team management capabilities could be improved."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."

"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If the budget is not a concern then I will choose to go with Apigee over WSA-2, but if it is then I would prefer the latter solution."

"The price of Apigee could be less expensive. The solution can be purchased monthly or annually."

"As most of the customers say, the tool is a bit expensive."

"Since it was acquired by Google, we can get a license based on our requirements and the cost level will depend on cloud access and support."

"It was fairly expensive. I don't know what the standard pricing is. I want to say that it's something like $80,000 for 800 million requests (approximately) a year."

"The prices are comparable."

"You do not necessarily pay for the license. The cloud solution is based more on transactions. So, you pay for it either way."

"Apigee is expensive and not cost-effective. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it an eight for the high cost. The changes individuals need to make on their side are costly."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

18%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apigee?

We can customize the dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

The solution has a yearly subscription. The solution’s pricing is competitive. Axway makes a significant impression compared to its peers, especially with a sensitive budget. In many instances, it ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Axway's queuing messages could be enhanced.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 28% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Apigee

Compared 10% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 8% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

SwaggerHub vs Apigee

Compared 2% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 16% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 10% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 6% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

March 2025

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

March 2025

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

Overview

Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.

Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.

The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.

Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:

Security: Protect APIs, messages, and backends with configurable policies such as OAuth, API key verification, XML/JSON threat protection, and access control.
API gateway: Secure and mediate the traffic between clients and backends, and between a company’s APIs and the developers who use the APIs.
Developer portal: Attract and engage application developers, enabling them to discover, explore, purchase, and test APIs and register to access and use the APIs.
API console: The console helps developers learn and work with APIs.
API lifecycle management: Manage the process of designing, developing, publishing, deploying, and versioning APIs.
Automated documentation: Automate the development of API documentation and software development kits.
Machine learning: Utilize machine learning and analytics to generate actionable insights and reports.

API monitoring: Apigee offers monitoring tools for API troubleshooting, security, and optimization.

Reviews from Real Users:

Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.

Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”

An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”

Google

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

Engie Group, Allianz

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

March 2025

Free Report: Apigee vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.