Apigee vs SwaggerHub comparison

Google and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Management category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while SmartBear is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.6. Google holds a 11.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to SmartBear’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 89 Apigee reviews

13,554 Views
13,418 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

Read 10 SwaggerHub reviews

1,306 Views
1,306 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Apigee

SwaggerHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apigee and SwaggerHub are key players in the API management realm. While Apigee is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and robust support in scalability and analytics, SwaggerHub is appreciated for its comprehensive features, justifying its higher price point due to its integration ease and API design capabilities.

Features: Apigee offers robust API traffic management, developer support, and advanced analytics, supporting both RESTful and SOAP protocols. SwaggerHub excels in simplifying API design and deployment with seamless CI/CD integration and collaborative editing features, focusing on defining and managing APIs effectively.

Room for Improvement: Apigee could improve in simplifying its deployment process and reducing the learning curve for new users. Enhancing UI intuitiveness would also be beneficial. SwaggerHub would benefit from enhanced API security features and more detailed analytics capabilities. Expanding its protocol support could also bolster its competitive edge.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee provides a versatile deployment model ideal for large enterprises with comprehensive customer support. SwaggerHub offers straightforward cloud-based deployment with collaboration in focus and responsive support, suitable for quick and user-friendly implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Apigee generally requires a lower initial investment offering favorable ROI in enterprise settings. SwaggerHub tends to be more expensive upfront, but its rich feature set and design tools are seen as providing strong ROI. It is positioned as a premium option for those prioritizing feature richness and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. SwaggerHub

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (8th)

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apigee is 11.1%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Apigee	11.1%
SwaggerHub	1.4%
Other	87.5%

API Management

Featured Reviews

ShawkyFoda

Senior Consultant at Goverment

Provides high visibility and control with good traffic monitoring

Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability. The replication process between Master and Slave for disaster recovery takes too long. Dependencies on analytics impact the performance of the user interface, which should be separate. The complex setup process on-premises, especially with multi-node installations, could also be improved. Additional control in product declarations, based on operations like POST and GET, is needed.

Read full review

SwaminathanSubramanian

Director/Enterprise Solutions Architect, Technology Advisor at Kyndryl

Facilitating enterprise-wide API governance and management

Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account. The scalability also needs enhancement, as it becomes flaky under increased load. Additionally, the versioning management could be improved to be on par with source code management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The usability is one of the best aspects of the product."

"I have found the most valuable features to be tracing a proxy, and managing proxy versions and revisions via the Edge UI component."

"I simply like how you can personalize your products and put them into product categories. That's what I like the most."

"Apigee is a great product with good feedback and recommendations from clients."

"It's stable."

"Apigee is a strong-featured solution. It leads in Gartner Quadrant ratings and it is a full-slated API solution that has the features that an API gateway requires."

"It is easy to deploy, configure, and monitor the APA."

"It accelerates development and deployment processes."

More Apigee pros

"It is a stable solution."

"The scalability is endless."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy and not at all difficult."

"It is quite a useful tool. It is quite good with the validation of the spec. It works quite well in terms of errors and conformity to the OpenAPI standard. It is better than Visual Studio Code in terms of editing."

"The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

More SwaggerHub pros

Cons

"Maintaining and deploying revisions need to be more defined."

"Google isn't enthusiastic about supporting older versions. Google is now trying to move all of its clients to X within the cloud."

"There is potential for improvement in specific domain integrations, such as standard integration capabilities needed for banking or retail sectors."

"Apigee is more of an entry level solution that does basic things pretty well, but if you want to go more customizable, you want to really look for another solution."

"Better functionality for validating inputs and outputs would be helpful."

"The analytical aspect of it could be better. I think it is fair if Apigee lets you configure some of the metrics of the key details you want to monitor in terms of analytics."

"Technical support model for OPDK should be more exposed and mature in terms of providing support during installation, run, and debug of Apigee in production on OPDK mode."

"An area for improvement would be to provide more information while troubleshooting."

More Apigee cons

"SwaggerHub's UI needs to be improved as it looks very old school."

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice"

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"It could be more intuitive compared to one of its competitors."

"We have to use additional tools to test APIs."

More SwaggerHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apigee is slightly expensive, but again, it can depend on the type of usage. All things considered, it is slightly expensive."

"The solution is a bit expensive. It's not for organizations in the early stages of their lifecycle but is more suited for mid- to enterprise-level platforms. Pricing varies by deployment model, with SaaS being the cheapest, costing around $100,000 per year for a subscription. For hybrid and on-prem deployments, the price increases. The on-prem model includes a license and additional installation and configuration professional service costs, which can be at least $40,000 to $60,000 for the initial setup. While it's not cheap, it offers long-term value and can be worthwhile."

"You do not necessarily pay for the license. The cloud solution is based more on transactions. So, you pay for it either way."

"The price of Apigee could be less expensive. The solution can be purchased monthly or annually."

"The tool is extremely expensive."

"The solution’s pricing could be more competitive."

"The prices are comparable."

"The cost increases as the usage increases."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"The tool is cheap."

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	65

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apigee?

We can customize the dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about SwaggerHub?

The tool's most valuable feature is licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

I started using SwaggerHub in its previous version, SmartMiner, with a tool called SoapUI. I used it to create mock web services to test web services and create test scripts and mock APIs. This usa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 21% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Apigee

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 8% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 7% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Apigee

Compared 7% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

Microsoft Azure API Management vs SwaggerHub

Compared 24% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs SwaggerHub

Compared 11% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs SwaggerHub

Compared 10% of the time

Stoplight vs SwaggerHub

Compared 8% of the time

IBM API Connect vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

October 2025

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

October 2025

Download SwaggerHub product report

Overview

Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.

Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.

The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.

Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:

Security: Protect APIs, messages, and backends with configurable policies such as OAuth, API key verification, XML/JSON threat protection, and access control.
API gateway: Secure and mediate the traffic between clients and backends, and between a company’s APIs and the developers who use the APIs.
Developer portal: Attract and engage application developers, enabling them to discover, explore, purchase, and test APIs and register to access and use the APIs.
API console: The console helps developers learn and work with APIs.
API lifecycle management: Manage the process of designing, developing, publishing, deploying, and versioning APIs.
Automated documentation: Automate the development of API documentation and software development kits.
Machine learning: Utilize machine learning and analytics to generate actionable insights and reports.

API monitoring: Apigee offers monitoring tools for API troubleshooting, security, and optimization.

Reviews from Real Users:

Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.

Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”

An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”

Google

SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. SwaggerHub

September 2025

Free Report: Apigee vs. SwaggerHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. SwaggerHub report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.