Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs webMethods.io comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Axway is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9. Axway holds a 3.7% mindshare in MFT, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Read 9 Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer reviews

1,010 Views
980 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

8,870 Views
444 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer and webMethods.io are competing in the data integration and management sector. While Axway's superior security and compliance options give it an edge for users focused on these aspects, webMethods.io’s integration capabilities and feature-rich environment often make it more appealing for those seeking functionality.

Features: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer offers strong security features, extensive regulatory compliance support, and advanced file tracking capabilities. In comparison, webMethods.io excels in cloud integration, comprehensive API management, and flexible workflow automation.

Room for Improvement: Axway might benefit from enhancements in cloud-native functionality, broader integration options, and improved flexibility in workflows. Meanwhile, webMethods.io could improve by lowering complexity in certain integration processes, offering better pricing options, and enhancing its on-premise deployment capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer provides a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer service to aid in troubleshooting. webMethods.io has a cloud-native deployment model simplifying integration tasks and offers responsive customer service, although it is often lauded for a quicker setup and adaptability.

Pricing and ROI: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is acclaimed for its competitive setup cost and excellent ROI in security-focused sectors. webMethods.io, although considered a premium option, justifies its cost with comprehensive features and efficient data handling, often seen as valuable for businesses prioritizing advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), API Management (11th), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is 3.7%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer	3.7%
webMethods.io	2.4%
Other	93.9%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Sayantan Sarkar

Technical Lead at HCL Technologies

User-friendly and doesn't take much space when getting installed

When it comes to the tool's scalability, I cannot say that everything can be done in the best version. There is always a scope for improvement. The tool can try to make it a little bit more flexible so that we can easily invoke the APIs, and in such a way, it can be made a little bit better. In general, everything is fine with respect to the tool's scalability. My company has encountered some challenges. The tool does not allow the explicit port for some of the protocols, like FTP. We are still selling the tool to some of our clients. I feel they should allow us to do some testing for the SMB-related protocols or Windows path-related protocols, which we are not allowing, making it difficult for us to identify the issue with respect to those SMB protocols as well as Amazon S3's protocols. I believe it is an area that needs to be fixed so that it will help the end customer do those types of tests without the help of another external tool. As of now, I can remember only these two scenarios where improvements are needed.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system."

"It makes a logical link between the inbound/outbound transfer, and makes it clearly visible. This is a very important feature for managing transfer with different environments, and it's very helpful in case of troubleshooting."

"It’s very flexible."

"It provides a good amount of storage capacity for a reasonable price and has a good range of connectors."

"It is an easy-to-use and stable product."

"Axway consolidated all of our communications into one platform, simplifying network and port management. Now, all we have to do is open one port to this application, and we can remove all the firewall rules on that port. It's much more straightforward to manage from a security perspective. We used to rely on an archaic FTP solution, but Axway features SFTP, so it was an improvement security-wise."

"AMPLIFY has all the essential features for managing file transfer."

"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."

"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

"Within the new version, webMethods API Gateway gives us an end-to-end lifecycle from the creation of the API up into the development, deployment, and promotion into production/live. The current end-to-end lifecycle of the API gives us enough authority and governance of the API. We know what are currently live services, what is in the testing stage of development, and what version that has been commissioned. So, the full life cycle itself gives us full authority and governance of the API."

"The cloud version of the solution is very easy to set up."

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution for me has been the configuration-based UI. Once you get the hang of it, it enables you to easily develop an API. In addition, it has many in-built policies that are quite handy."

"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."

"The orchestration aspects of APIs, the integration capabilities, and the logging functionalities were the most critical features of our workflow."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"It is complicated to manage multi-operations, particularly in handling file name changes within file transcripts."

"The areas in need of improvement are the monitoring and the cut-off management, when needed. Today you have at least two solutions: Buy the other Axway suite, Sentinel, or integrate it into your monitoring system."

"Improvement in Data Encoding would be very appreciated (I'm thinking of ASCII-EBCDIC, ASCII-ASCII, etc.)."

"The initial setup was quite complex."

"We only hope that they continue to keep updating the solution and improving the offering. They could always do more updates and releases."

"Their monitoring is not up to the mark and needs improvement."

"Sometimes, the application's embedded databases couldn't perform well for a higher volume of data."

"One area of improvement is troubleshooting. When a transfer fails, they provide little information about the login, which makes troubleshooting difficult. Also, file transfer scheduling is primitive. By that, I mean you can't define a complex schedule, like scheduling a job to run at particular hours multiple times in a day."

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer cons

"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."

"webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional."

"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."

"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."

"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."

"The configuring of the JWT token would be improved as it is a confusing process. We require more information on this part of the solution."

"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."

"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AMPLIFY's license is a one-time investment."

"Pricing and licensing is related to the protocols you choose to support."

"It is quite expensive, and because of that, we get good service from them in return for the price paid."

"The platform's price aligns with the market."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"The product is expensive."

"The product is very expensive."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."

"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

There's infinite pricing available on their portal, however, it's typically accompanied by a discount. However, detailed pricing information is confidential and was not shared in this call.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

Their monitoring is not up to the mark and needs improvement. They should have enhanced auto-reconnection capabilities for interrupted file transfers and implement features allowing chunk movement ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 25% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 21% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 16% of the time

MOVEit vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 15% of the time

JSCAPE by Redwood vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 14% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

August 2025

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer report

Download Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

September 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

SecureTransport, Axway SecureTransport, AMPLIFY MFT

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

As a multi-protocol MFT gateway, Axway SecureTransport provides the flexibility you need to support virtually any MFT use case. Secure, manage, and track file flows among people and applications inside your enterprise, and beyond your firewall to your user communities, mobile devices, and the cloud. Perform high-volume automated file transfers between systems, sites, lines of business and external partners, to user-driven communications and mobile, folder- and portal-based file sharing.

Axway

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

BNP Paribas Securities Services, Bollor_, E.ON AG Group, BMW Group, IdenTrust, Gassco, International Post Corporation, SNCF, DB Schenker Logistics, Logius, CSCA, La Poste

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.