

ClickHouse and Azure Database for PostgreSQL are both competing in the database management space, with ClickHouse showing a slight edge in real-time analytical performance and cost efficiency, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL excels in integration with Azure services and security.
Features: ClickHouse offers outstanding real-time query performance, scalable columnar storage, and efficient integration for on-premises deployments. Azure Database for PostgreSQL boasts strong integration with Azure's ecosystem, extensive scalability, and robust security features.
Room for Improvement: ClickHouse could benefit from enhanced documentation, improved third-party integration, and strengthened SQL compatibility. Azure Database for PostgreSQL can improve dynamic scaling capabilities, cost management, and licensing simplicity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ClickHouse supports private, hybrid, and on-premises deployment with a strong community and enterprise support, though the open-source version may have limited assistance. Azure Database for PostgreSQL simplifies public cloud deployment and service integration, with generally good customer service but needing faster issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: ClickHouse is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, providing high ROI through reduced infrastructural expenses. Azure Database for PostgreSQL's pay-as-you-go model offers scalability but can result in unexpected costs, while also lowering hardware investments through its cloud-based operation.
It offers at least 25 percent cost savings compared to maintaining on-premises databases.
Now, we use embedded PostgreSQL vectors, which will undoubtedly reduce the TCO by using a much more cost-effective solution.
We've reduced our total ownership cost because we are not spending on expensive SQL server licenses.
I estimate we save four to five hours per person per week due to this efficiency, translating to around 20 to 25 hours saved monthly for each individual.
We could reduce the amount of employees needed when we migrated to ClickHouse Cloud.
With ClickHouse, we didn't need to spend much on resources, cutting costs by around 25 to 30%.
Once we open a support case, we have people engaged within about 20 minutes, especially for a Sev 1 issue.
On a scale from one to ten, I rate customer service and technical support a nine because they are quick in responding and in working with me to rectify any issues we come across.
The documentation and training we've received through Microsoft Learn on how to migrate, deploy, and manage the solution is exceptional.
If more timely support could be provided during critical issues, situations could have been resolved much more quickly, saving considerable time.
When we faced any challenges, the ClickHouse support team provided helpful resolutions.
We utilize AVN ClickHouse, which is effectively managed by AVN, providing bug fixes and developing new functionalities along with architecture reviews.
We do not have to buy everything and build it. It is already there.
However, we can see how well it scales after we deploy it for some large enterprise customers or big government organizations.
The scaling options with FlexServer provide us with the flexibility we need based on application complexity.
The vertical scalability is impressive, with high insert throughput, allowing millions of rows per second with low latency.
ClickHouse is highly scalable.
The scalability of ClickHouse is great.
It is the go-to database if seeking performance and capacity.
I have not experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues; it has been very stable.
There is a stability issue where, if the database usage peaks quickly, it may crash and require intervention to restore functionality.
I can confidently say that it is very consistent and stable even when handling high volume loads and real-time streaming analytics across financial and operational domains.
ClickHouse handles large volumes of data efficiently.
ClickHouse is stable, as we did not encounter stability issues in production.
It does not presently support knowledge graph functionalities as Neo4j does.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved by allowing quicker scaling without blips.
I believe there could be improvements in the mirroring part and Change Data Capture (CDC).
Another challenge is the lack of robust support for transactional databases, which limits its use as a primary database.
ClickHouse should be able to import data from other types of sources like Parquet and Iceberg tables and all the new upcoming data formats.
My experience with ClickHouse's documentation is that it needs improvement; I think it can be made more beginner-friendly, while the community support is really good.
We've reduced costs by 60 percent compared to maintaining on-premises solutions.
We chose it because it is more cost-effective than Microsoft SQL.
Once you are comfortable and ready to make some commitments, you get about 30 percent saving if you are going with one-year or three-year reservation cost.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is very expensive—ClickHouse is the most expensive option.
ClickHouse is open source with no hidden fees, offering cost-effective data management.
I found ClickHouse's pricing to be efficient in comparison to other services such as Redshift.
My takeaway as a CTO is that they're comfortable with the security posture, the features, the observability, alerts, and now it integrates into the rest of the Azure landscape.
The query analyzers help me find out what's happening in each of the queries.
If a database has any task that has been interrupted or any connection issue, it will alert LogicMonitor, and we have a centralized panel for all the alerts.
ClickHouse has reduced our storage cost and improved our 99th percentile latency by 40%.
For cost optimization, after deploying the cluster on-premises and using S3 Express, approximately 5x cost savings were achieved on data storage.
ClickHouse positively impacted our organization by absorbing the whole logging system without hassle, storing logs for six months efficiently.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ClickHouse | 6.6% |
| Azure Database for PostgreSQL | 1.3% |
| Other | 92.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers efficient management, robust networking, and seamless Microsoft integration. Known for its strong performance and high satisfaction in enterprise settings, it provides operational efficiency, security, and monitoring.
With features that facilitate Azure integration, easy configuration, and AI integration, Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves as a valuable choice for businesses requiring operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Users benefit from powerful vector capabilities, seamless Microsoft service integration, straightforward management, and user authentication ensuring high satisfaction. Easy optimization, query analysis, and backup operations make it suitable for varied enterprise applications. However, improvements in flexible scaling, cost-effectiveness of monitoring tools, and enhanced integration with Azure OpenAI would enhance its capabilities further.
What Are the Key Features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL?Industries such as healthcare, retail, and finance leverage Azure Database for PostgreSQL for backend solutions, incident reporting, and public information sharing. Managed service providers utilize its strong performance for client needs, while administrators use it for applications like ControlM. Its flexibility supports containerized applications and disaster recovery, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments.
ClickHouse is renowned for its speed, scalability, and real-time query performance. Its compatibility with SQL standards enhances flexibility while enabling integration with popular tools.
ClickHouse leverages a column-based architecture for efficient data compression and real-time analytics. It seamlessly integrates with tools like Kafka and Tableau and is effective in handling large datasets due to its cost-efficient aggregation capabilities. With robust data deduplication and strong community backing, users can access comprehensive documentation and up-to-date functionality. However, improvements in third-party integration, cloud deployment, and handling of SQL syntax differences are noted, impacting ease-of-use and migration from other databases.
What features make ClickHouse outstanding?
What benefits should users consider?
ClickHouse is deployed in sectors like telecommunications for passive monitoring and is beneficial for data analytics, logging Clickstream data, and as an ETL engine. Organizations harness it for machine learning applications when combined with GPT. With the ability to be installed independently, it's an attractive option for avoiding cloud service costs.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.