Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo

Top 10 Azure Database for PostgreSQL Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Azure Database for PostgreSQL Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Azure Database for PostgreSQL based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include PostgreSQL, Amazon RDS, and Oracle Database as a Service. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Azure Database for PostgreSQL surpasses its competitors by offering seamless scalability, built-in high availability, and advanced security features, ensuring reliable performance and efficient data management for enterprises seeking a robust and adaptable database solution.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
PostgreSQL
4.2 out of 5
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
PostgreSQL
4.2 out of 5

PostgreSQL is a powerful and efficient database solution, ideal for transactional purposes and batch processing. Its superior indexing and performance advantages make it a valuable choice for organizations. 

The most valuable features include its ease of management, extensive range of features, and complete SQL dialects. It offers JSONB aggregators and a specific data type for optimized performance. The open-source nature, community support, and cost-effectiveness make it a reliable and flexible option for organizations.

Download Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. PostgreSQL Report
Affordable solution.
It is free. There is no license on it.
View comparison
Pricing
Affordable solution.
It is free. There is no license on it.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Amazon RDS
4.2 out of 5
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Amazon RDS
4.2 out of 5
Amazon RDS offers ease of scaling and integration with AWS, attracting users with automated management and disaster recovery. In comparison, Azure Database for PostgreSQL appeals with its seamless Azure integration and robust security, particularly benefiting users with Microsoft technology reliance.
Download Amazon RDS vs. Azure Database for PostgreSQL Report
Amazon RDS setup costs are typically lower due to its flexible options, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL may incur higher initial expenditures with its comprehensive enterprise features. The difference lies in initial investment versus advanced functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon RDS setup costs are typically lower due to its flexible options, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL may incur higher initial expenditures with its comprehensive enterprise features. The difference lies in initial investment versus advanced functionalities.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Oracle Database as a Service
4.3 out of 5
Oracle Database as a Service excels in security, resilience, and performance, appealing to data-heavy operations. In comparison, Azure Database for PostgreSQL draws attention with its competitive pricing and extensive Azure integration, suited for cost-conscious enterprises seeking scalable, cloud-integrated solutions.
Download Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report
Oracle Database as a Service requires higher setup costs compared to Azure Database for PostgreSQL, making Azure an attractive option for users prioritizing lower initial investments.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Database as a Service requires higher setup costs compared to Azure Database for PostgreSQL, making Azure an attractive option for users prioritizing lower initial investments.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
3.9 out of 5
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer appeals to enterprises with high-performance demands and extensive support, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers simplicity and integration. In comparison, Oracle caters to large-scale operations; Azure benefits projects integrating into Microsoft's cloud with cost-effective pricing.
Download Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Database for PostgreSQL, which is more budget-friendly. This distinction in initial expenses highlights a key difference between the two cloud database solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Database for PostgreSQL, which is more budget-friendly. This distinction in initial expenses highlights a key difference between the two cloud database solutions.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
SAP HANA Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
SAP HANA Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Azure Database for PostgreSQL attracts tech buyers for its competitive pricing and seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem. In comparison, SAP HANA Cloud offers advanced data processing and analytics features, appealing to those needing real-time insights and in-memory computing despite its higher cost.
Download Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. SAP HANA Cloud Report
Azure Database for PostgreSQL has a lower initial setup cost compared to SAP HANA Cloud, making it more budget-friendly for companies with limited resources. However, SAP HANA Cloud's advanced capabilities may justify its higher costs for enterprise environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Database for PostgreSQL has a lower initial setup cost compared to SAP HANA Cloud, making it more budget-friendly for companies with limited resources. However, SAP HANA Cloud's advanced capabilities may justify its higher costs for enterprise environments.

Related categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Open Source Databases
Vector Databases