Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. Microsoft holds a 3.3% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Read 23 Azure Database for PostgreSQL reviews

2,850 Views
1,824 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Read 7 Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reviews

954 Views
954 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and Azure Database for PostgreSQL compete in the database solutions category, each offering unique advantages. Azure Database for PostgreSQL appears to have the upper hand in terms of scalability, cost-effectiveness, and integration within the Azure ecosystem, making it attractive for businesses seeking a flexible and managed service.

Features: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is tailored for high-performance Oracle database environments, featuring advanced data security, large-scale application support, and excellent Oracle workload optimization. Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers notable scalability, seamless integration with Azure services, and straightforward use of open-source PostgreSQL, combined with comprehensive monitoring and observing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer could enhance its user experience by improving encryption capabilities and simplifying deployment expertise requirements. Azure Database for PostgreSQL could benefit from reduced costs for cloud execution, clearer version upgrade processes, and more comprehensive control over database configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer requires specialized expertise due to its sophisticated systems, though Oracle-specific support is strong. Azure Database for PostgreSQL excels with streamlined deployment and integration within Azure's infrastructure, benefiting from comprehensive Azure support services, providing ease for users seeking cloud-native solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer involves significant initial costs due to its specialized hardware, yet enterprises focused on Oracle-specific optimizations may find the ROI satisfactory. Azure Database for PostgreSQL presents a budget-friendly setup with flexible pricing models, offering better ROI for businesses favoring cost-effective and efficient cloud-native database solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th)

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is 3.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is 3.7%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Database for PostgreSQL	3.3%
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer	3.7%
Other	93.0%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Sathish Palanisamy

Staff Data Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Improves database performance, supports AI integration, and accelerates customer-focused innovation

Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved in the area of elastic capabilities. One of the things we were actively looking for is the elastic feature, which was made a GA at this Ignite event. I am really happy that finally in Azure, we have a product which we can use for elastic clusters. If you are bound with a single server, then you have a vertical limit. Now you do not have any limits. As long as your use case grows, we can grow. The only thing I would maybe be thinking about is we should also allow customers to pick different node sizes for every node inside the elastic eventually. Some nodes do not need that big capacity. So that may be a nice-to-have feature, though it is not a must-have at this point.

Read full review

WALID BOUHAJJA

Oracle DBS at Bpifrance

Positive experience with virtual cloud network creation and database migration highlights patching challenges

The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs. We have many features, including the observability feature that helps check performance and generates numerous reports about performance. We have also implemented APIs, enabling us to create and perform many operations. This means we need DBAs who can work with APIs. We are autonomous in the patching process and don't need Oracle for patching. If you configure the process of patching, it will be executed automatically. We are using dynamic scaling which is implemented on an external virtual machine, helping us to downscale or upscale the CPU. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has supported our organization's compliance and data sovereignty without problems. I have observed some limitations. For example, regarding encryption, though it is mandatory for Exadata Cloud at Customer, we cannot encrypt the database with external keys. Currently, with Exadata Cloud at Customer, using external keys is not possible.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"PostgresSQL is acknowledged as an incredibly powerful industry leader. We've built critical pieces of national infrastructure in the UK that rely on Postgres. A version of Postgres on Azure that's easy to adopt enables us to innovate. The addition of AI extensions is even more exciting. It's a significant opportunity for us."

"We transact 128 trillion data per month using Azure Database for PostgreSQL, which helps us to be more successful on every transaction that the customer is requesting from us."

"Our organization's database uptime has improved after implementing Azure Database for PostgreSQL, particularly with the flexible server's redundant configuration capabilities, which allow for failovers and read-only configurations."

"The most valuable features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL for us are reliability, performance, and cost, making it a good cost-benefit for us."

"A native cloud approach actually has more advantage because it is easy to deploy, faster to deploy, and easy to recover and roll back."

"The performance of our RAG application is very good. We have 96% satisfaction."

"The operational efficiency of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is good."

"The benefits we have realized as a company from using Azure Database for PostgreSQL on Azure make the life of our customers and our solution easier."

Cons

"Support can certainly get better."

"The critical service is the Azure OpenAI service. It would help to make it simpler and easier to integrate with that or cognitive services."

"They can offer more RAG extensions. Currently, it only has the vector search. It does not presently support knowledge graph functionalities as Neo4j does. It also does not offer some tools to improve indexing the way other vector databases offer."

"Perhaps a minor improvement could be made in simplifying user additions, allowing for an easier process rather than scripting it out. However, scripting is not a significant issue."

"Coming from a traditional Oracle Exadata setup, all queries will run faster because Oracle has that optimization layer in between which optimizes it for you, which is why you pay a lot of money for that. When you come to Azure Database for PostgreSQL, that layer is gone."

"Microsoft support for Azure Database for PostgreSQL rates about four out of ten based on my experience. You always get the same questions with Microsoft support, and it's not really straightforward."

"They can offer more RAG extensions. Currently, it only has the vector search."

"We had to move to a CSP. This has been a significant challenge. We experienced trouble with our CSP and had to change CSPs because we could not get the level of support we needed from them."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We do not pay for a full-year subscription because our usage is still at the beginning phase and not much. The pay-as-you-go model works well for us."

"The pay-as-you-go pricing model plays a critical role in managing database-related costs and resource allocation. We build using Infrastructure as Code (IAC) and maintain a focus on FinOps to control Azure service costs. Some clients are pushy on price. It's critical to automate it, so we're just using it when appropriate and switching it off in certain scenarios."

"The pricing experience is positive. Azure Database for PostgreSQL reduces the need for hardware investments, and the pay-as-you-go pricing model positively affects database-related costs by allowing us to start small and scale as needed."

"There aren't any notable areas for improvement that I could see. PostgreSQL was self-sufficient with no need for additional database knowledge to maintain it."

"The price is too much."

"The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

35%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Azure Database for PostgreSQL is positive; I appreciate it all. The pricing is very cost-effective and stable given that we have many data...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved in ways I'm very curious to explore with Horizon. I'm interested in seeing how the fully enterprise-hardened features change things and where that blur...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

My main use cases for Azure Database for PostgreSQL came from a personal project to scratch an itch, and it was the easiest one to go grab. I appreciate how easy PostgreSQL is to get running locall...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

The pricing is reasonable due to a universal agreement, which often positions Oracle solutions better against others. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

In future updates for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, I would like to see another feature for the different costs for the non-CDB models, because if you are not using the non-CDB models, you have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

The use cases for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer are based on our actual solution. We have the Exadata, but it has reached its end of life. The X5 has attained the end of life, so we discussed mi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon RDS vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 13% of the time

MySQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 10% of the time

SAP HANA Cloud vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure Database for PostgreSQL Competitors

Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 20% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

January 2026

Download Azure Database for PostgreSQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

January 2026

Download Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer product report

Overview

Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers efficient management, robust networking, and seamless Microsoft integration. Known for its strong performance and high satisfaction in enterprise settings, it provides operational efficiency, security, and monitoring.

With features that facilitate Azure integration, easy configuration, and AI integration, Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves as a valuable choice for businesses requiring operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Users benefit from powerful vector capabilities, seamless Microsoft service integration, straightforward management, and user authentication ensuring high satisfaction. Easy optimization, query analysis, and backup operations make it suitable for varied enterprise applications. However, improvements in flexible scaling, cost-effectiveness of monitoring tools, and enhanced integration with Azure OpenAI would enhance its capabilities further.

What Are the Key Features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

Robust Networking: Offers seamless Azure integration to optimize cloud resources.
AI Integration: Simplifies incorporating artificial intelligence into databases.
Monitoring Tools: Provides comprehensive tools for efficient database management.
Security: Ensures user data is protected with high-standard security protocols.
Cost-Effectiveness: Delivers efficient operations with budget-friendly solutions.

What Benefits Should Users Consider?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines database management tasks, reducing workload.
High Satisfaction: Receives positive feedback for its reliable performance in enterprises.
Enterprise Compatibility: Integrates across various Microsoft services for enhanced productivity.
User-Friendly Management: Facilitates straightforward database administration.
Scalability: Supports businesses with potential growth through flexible solutions.

Industries such as healthcare, retail, and finance leverage Azure Database for PostgreSQL for backend solutions, incident reporting, and public information sharing. Managed service providers utilize its strong performance for client needs, while administrators use it for applications like ControlM. Its flexibility supports containerized applications and disaster recovery, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments.

Microsoft

Oracle Cloud@Customer brings Oracle’s complete portfolio of public cloud infrastructure, fully managed cloud services, and Oracle Fusion SaaS applications into your data center. It enables you to run applications faster and lower your costs using the same high-performance capabilities, autonomous operations, and low-cost subscription pricing in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). You get all this while maintaining complete control of your data so you can address data residency, security, and connectivity concerns.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.