Azure NetApp Files vs Everpure Evergreen One comparison

NetApp and Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. NetApp is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7, while Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0. NetApp holds a 3.0% mindshare in CS, compared to Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) users who would recommend it.

Azure NetApp Files

Read 18 Azure NetApp Files reviews

3,718 Views
1,859 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Everpure Evergreen One

Read 5 Everpure Evergreen One reviews

3,429 Views
1,029 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Everpure Evergreen One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2026

Azure NetApp Files and Everpure Evergreen One compete in the cloud storage solutions market. Azure NetApp Files is often highlighted for its robust feature set, while Everpure Evergreen One is praised for its cost-effectiveness and broad compatibility across platforms. Based on feature set and ROI potential, Azure NetApp Files seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration and high-performance capabilities within its own ecosystem.

Features: Azure NetApp Files offers dynamic storage management, seamless connections with other Azure services, and high-performance capabilities suited for demanding enterprise needs. Everpure Evergreen One provides excellent scalability, data protection, and offers integrated features for mixed-cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Azure NetApp Files could improve its affordability for small and medium-sized businesses, expand compatibility across more non-Azure platforms, and enhance feature availability for mixed-cloud environments. Everpure Evergreen One could benefit from deeper integration with specific cloud ecosystems, enhanced user interfaces for easier management, and more detailed support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure NetApp Files provides streamlined implementation within the Azure environment, benefiting from Microsoft's extensive support. Everpure Evergreen One simplifies deployment across mixed-cloud setups with efficient customer support that addresses diverse platform needs.

Pricing and ROI: Azure NetApp Files generally involves higher initial costs but promises substantial ROI when integrated into existing Azure infrastructures, enhancing resource efficiency. Everpure Evergreen One offers competitive pricing with a cost advantage in heterogeneous environments, delivering strong ROI through its versatility and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 897,297 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Cloud Storage

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (9th), Public Cloud Storage Services (13th)

Everpure Evergreen One

Ranking in Cloud Storage

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (15th), Managed Cloud Services (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 3.0%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Everpure Evergreen One is 2.8%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure NetApp Files	3.0%
Everpure Evergreen One	2.8%
Other	94.2%

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

Rajat Wadhwa

Cloud Architect at IBM

Cross-region replication has delivered seamless disaster recovery for enterprise storage needs

In terms of improvement, I would say cost reservation; the cost is a bit high. If we compare Azure Files and Azure NetApp Files, I know that customers are using less of Azure NetApp due to the cost. If they bring the cost a little bit closer to what Azure Files offers, it can be a great product in the market and bring a lot of business to NetApp. Backup is quite critical. As of now, Azure NetApp Files requires you to use Azure NetApp Backup solution, which is in public preview at the moment. I would definitely expect NetApp to come up with that solution so that customers can start using it because they do not have confidence in backup as it is still in preview. They are still doing some testing and research on that product, which is not officially released for use by multiple customers.

Read full review

Santhosh Sridhara

Cloud Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

OpEx storage model has simplified SLAs, capacity planning, and cyber‑resilient recovery

The most valuable features in Pure Storage Evergreen One are the SLAs, which are tied to the kind of services that we are going to run. These SLAs govern the consumption and the reporting as well. I find it more attractive when we are tied to a specific SLA, and the VRA is providing the services within that agreed SLA, then there is no requirement for a complete capacity assessment. The entire capacity review, assessment, and recommendations come as part of Pure Storage Evergreen One solution. Pure Storage Evergreen One has a list of services which will provide the services, including cyber resilience. First, they have complete capacity management which is done by them and which will also provide us a heads up on how we are consuming the services and where these services can be improved. Second, it will also provide us some of the key attributes, such as we can take the snapshots and LUN snapshots, which will provide a cyber-resilient copy where data can be secured in case of a cyber attack. We have an option to basically recover the earliest. Third, because of this feature and because of Pure Storage Evergreen One, I am talking about the Evergreen aspect. Because of Evergreen, we also have an option to upgrade the controllers based on the SLAs. If the agreed SLAs are not meeting the requirement, we have a provision to upgrade the controllers and so on. This is giving a good feature for us to evaluate and provide a valuable proposition to the customer who wants to use Pure Storage as a Pure OpEx model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One aspect of Azure NetApp Files that I truly appreciate is its remarkable performance capabilities."

"The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring downtime, which is a strong point. Based on the money spent, we can get performance improvements and high availability."

"I like the SnapMirror feature in Azure NetApp Files. It helps me create backups with snapshots and makes data recovery and compression."

"Azure NetApp Files gives our clients better options."

"I think the easiest part is, when you do a comparison, it is the throughput versus the cost. And it's much easier to set up."

"It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand on-the-fly without the need to reprovision something."

"The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes."

"Azure NetApp Files has been stable."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"The Evergreen program is excellent, and the pricing is quite reasonable. My friends who work there are doing very well and consistently achieving strong results. Like any company, they experience occasional downturns but perform impressively overall."

"The most valuable features in Pure Storage Evergreen One are the SLAs, which are tied to the kind of services that we are going to run, and these SLAs govern the consumption and the reporting as well."

"Pure Storage has the highest Net Promoter Score in the market."

"We have snapshots. We put snapshots on disks, and we can save information. In the case of ransomware, everything is in the snapshot. We have a snapshot lock on it, so it's safe."

"The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous peer environment we were running on, and it seems to have a better feature set."

Cons

"Azure NetApp Files could improve by being more diverse to integrate better with other solutions, such as Splunk and the on-premise version. There are some use cases that are not covered natively by Azure. It is not the best solution because it is not external from the cloud which for me is the best type of solution."

"It is about four times the cost of premium storage on Azure, so in order for us to use it, we'd have to be willing to increase our storage costs by four times."

"We would like to have backup functionality built-in so that we don't run into the issue where the replication process makes a copy of the corrupted data."

"The main area for improvement is in the support ticket system. Since it's a SaaS platform, support tickets are managed by Microsoft or NetApp backend. This can sometimes lead to cross-functional challenges for organizations."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum."

"Its pricing can be better."

"Features are being added to this product at a very slow pace, and they should be speeding that up and being a little more aggressive."

"Azure NetApp Files is expensive."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"I would love to explore more options on what Pure Storage Evergreen One can offer in general, mostly from the cybersecurity perspective and air gap."

"I'm not sure if any improvements are needed."

"To me, I think it's a little expensive. Then again, you get what you pay for."

"Many customers report that the starting price is quite high. However, the overall total cost of ownership can be reduced over time due to features like the Evergreen architecture, which allows savings through less management and environmental benefits."

"The only potential drawback is that Pure Storage might be overkill if you don't need microsecond response times."

"It would be nice to have support in Swedish."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing depends on your scaling and consumption."

"It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum. A one terabyte minimum would be better."

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent."

"Our pricing has not been determined because we are still waiting on additional features."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is very good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

897,297 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

On pricing, I would rate it around eight. It's highly priced, and there's no cost reservation option available compared to Azure Files. If NetApp could bring that kind of model for customers to sav...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure NetApp Files?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage Evergreen One?

Because of our own governance, we can propose options for consumption, and we also provide both CapEx as well as OpEx based solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage Evergreen One?

I would love to explore more options on what Pure Storage Evergreen One can offer in general, mostly from the cybersecurity perspective and air gap. If the solution can be such a way where it can b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pure Storage Evergreen One?

We are subscribed for Pure Storage Evergreen One and Pure1, which allows us to have an OpEx kind of a model working along with them. This is providing us an advantage. Pure Storage Evergreen One an...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 8% of the time

Nasuni vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

HPE GreenLake vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 18% of the time

Dell APEX vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 8% of the time

HPE GreenLake for File Storage vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp Keystone vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 6% of the time

Everpure Evergreen Forever vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 6% of the time

More Everpure Evergreen One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

June 2026

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Buyer's Guide

Everpure Evergreen One

June 2026

Download Everpure Evergreen One product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

Pure Storage Evergreen One

Overview

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

Evergreen//One is a storage software that delivers a data storage-as-a-service model for businesses backed by SLAs. This is a solution for customers who want more predictability, with clear guarantees for availability, performance, capacity, and efficiency. Evergreen//One delivers storage as a managed service across on-premises and public cloud, so customers get cloud-like operations wherever their data lives. It provides scalable capacity, non-disruptive upgrades, and built-in capacity planning, so customers avoid hardware lifecycle management. In most regions, Everpure can deliver and activate Evergreen//One within 28 days, so customers can move quickly while keeping storage consistent.

What are the key features of Evergreen//One?

SLAs Aligned with Service Requirements: Guarantees tailored to organizational needs, enhancing operational reliability.
Comprehensive Capacity Management: Facilitates effective resource allocation and device management.
Cyber Resilience with LUN Snapshots: Regular backups that ensure enhanced data protection against unforeseen events.
Controller Upgrades: Maintains peak performance aligned with service level agreements.
Fast Architecture: Supports industries requiring low latency and quick data accessibility.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Evergreen//One?

OpEx Model: Flexible operational expenditure through Pure1, fostering capital efficiency.
Simplicity and Speed: Appreciated for its straightforward operation and rapid processing capabilities.
Seamless Integration: Ease of incorporating APIs with servers, promoting streamlined workflow management.
Reasonable Pricing: Viewed as cost-effective given its long-term ownership benefits and advanced features.

Implementations of Evergreen//One in industries often focus on enhancing infrastructure consumption for reseller businesses. It serves as a primary storage solution for virtual machines, where performance and security are paramount. It supports organizations by addressing both short-term storage needs and providing resilience for long durations, which is crucial for data centers managing extensive VMware and VDI infrastructures. Industries benefit from its fast performance and guided workshops that assist teams in leveraging the full potential of its technologies.

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One

June 2026

Free Report: Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

897,297 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.