Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry comparison

Microsoft and Broadcom are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #13. Microsoft holds a 1.0% mindshare in PSP, compared to Broadcom’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 11 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

563 Views
535 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Read 15 Pivotal Cloud Foundry reviews

4,913 Views
4,864 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are competing platforms in the enterprise-grade cloud application sector. Azure Red Hat OpenShift generally has the upper hand due to its expansive feature set, despite its higher costs.

Features: Pivotal Cloud Foundry features automation, lifecycle management, and easy deployment, enhancing performance and CI/CD integration. Azure Red Hat OpenShift excels in language support, container orchestration, and scalability, providing robust tools for cloud-native application deployment.

Room for Improvement: Pivotal Cloud Foundry could benefit from broader language support, improved container orchestration, and enhanced scalability features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift could reduce complexity in initial setup, lower costs, and further streamline its comprehensive deployment model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pivotal Cloud Foundry provides streamlined deployments with fast time-to-market and self-assisted features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift offers flexible deployment models with enhanced scalability and detailed documentation, backed by robust support from Red Hat and Microsoft.

Pricing and ROI: Pivotal Cloud Foundry's simple pricing can lead to a faster ROI. Azure Red Hat OpenShift, though more expensive initially, offers long-term benefits and adaptable solutions that may result in significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is 7.2%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pivotal Cloud Foundry	7.2%
Azure Red Hat OpenShift	1.0%
Other	91.8%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

DeepakMishra

CEO, Head of Sales and Business Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Integrated cloud platform has streamlined app delivery and supported certified marketplace products

A potential area for improvement for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is to see managed identity support and ensure that some of the security features are not conflicting with Azure or Azure product features. I am sure in the future it will be more templatized so that we need not depend on Azure security features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift should be independent of Azure security features with respect to container scan and all that. Why would it use an Azure security feature? That is what I find. It is still yet to be GA and commonly available, but that is a strong reason for improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2263239

Head of Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

PCF allows for fine-grained configuration, especially regarding scaling but routing limitations

Something that can be done better is canary deployment. So, right now, we're using blue-green deployment. The support for canary deployment would be nice. A few things, such as what OpenShift does better are cluster management. Like, you can manage the entire thing together. Currently, it's possible to manage all the clusters, especially when it comes to cluster management using straightforward configuration. As of now, we have to handle each application instance individually, which means servicing them one by one. It would be better if we could perform these actions as a group or in a more streamlined manner. One more downside is actually the cost of this environment. So, major downside of Pivotal, it's the cost. So, the runtime running costs are very high. Extremely high.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

"As a consulting company, we implement Azure Red Hat OpenShift for our clients, who appreciate its integration capabilities for enhancing cloud operations. While we handle implementation, build processes, and automation, the operational responsibility lies with the customer. The service provides basic processes and support from Red Hat and Microsoft, which benefits clients by allowing them to focus on their business rather than regular operations like cluster upgrades."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"The functions and features in Azure Red Hat OpenShift that I have found most valuable are that it is a platform that is baked into Azure, and since it is baked into Azure, it is managed operation by Azure, which takes out the complexity of the infrastructure management and day two operations when compared with on-premise OpenShift."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the deployment is easier."

"It is a scalable product...We are not facing any particular issues since most of the applications in our company are written in Java and .NET."

"It supports CI/CD, and is integrated with the CI/CD very well."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is very robust, especially for building Java."

"I find the ease of deployment and management of microservices to be the most valuable features. The platform also has good auto-scaling capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is auto-healing and the plenty of other features that are provided."

"We find its stability and scalability valuable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to scale. The services that connect to the database are also very good."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

"The product is expensive."

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

"Automation could be improved."

"I would rate the technical support from Microsoft as six."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

"It should offer more security features."

"The user interface should be simpler to navigate because it t can take time for users to learn it."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry doesn't have certain advanced features."

"It is not straightforward to setup."

"In the next release, I would like to see easy integration with external tools."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve the documentation. They are good, but they could improve more. Additionally, it would be beneficial if there were more use case examples."

"The Pivotal Cloud Foundry's initial setup has a learning curve for my team, but it was easy to use."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve on the technology it is a bit complex."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing is on the higher side and there are cheaper options available."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve. However, in this category of solutions, they are all expensive."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is based on the customer's requirements. However, the price is comparable to other similar solutions."

"You're paying for the number of virtual machines you want to install in the installation."

"Licensing is on a monthly basis and right now we pay $24/month. There are no other costs over and above that."

"We do pay for the licensing cost because we have opted for a private cloud setup. So, it is a cloud setup, and we have to make payments based on the cloud size. I do not consider it very costly when comparing it to the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

37%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

My use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is for an employee engagement application and HR, and I have also used it for an agentic bot.

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 28% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

Google App Engine vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 35% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 14% of the time

Google Cloud vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 5% of the time

Google Compute Engine vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 1% of the time

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

January 2026

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Buyer's Guide

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

January 2026

Download Pivotal Cloud Foundry product report

Also Known As

No data available

PCF, Pivotal Application Service (PAS), Pivotal Container Service (PKS), Pivotal Function Service (PFS)

Overview

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. Kubernetes is at the core of Red Hat OpenShift. OpenShift brings added-value features to complement Kubernetes, making it a turnkey container platform as a service (PaaS) with a significantly improved developer and operator experience.

Microsoft

Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) is the leading enterprise PaaS, powered by Cloud Foundry. PCF provides a cloud-native application platform that allows you to continuously deliver any app to every major private and public cloud with a single platform. PCF is proven to accelerate feature delivery with higher developer productivity and a 200:1 developer to operator ratio. PCF's built-in security and self-healing capabilities reduce risk in your app portfolio while maintaining high-availability at scale to keep customer facing systems online even in the most challenging circumstances. pivotal.io

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Humana, Citibank, Mercedes Benz, Liberty Mutual, The Home Depot, GE, West Corp, Merrill Corporation, CoreLogic, Orange, Dish Network, Comcast, Bloomberg, Internal Revenue Service, Ford Motor Company, Garmin, Volkswagen, Solera, Allstate, US Air Force, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, ScotiaBank

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.