Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 13.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon AWS

Read 260 Amazon AWS reviews

39,609 Views
15,844 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 11 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

1,275 Views
1,186 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon AWS

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Amazon AWS and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are leading platforms in the cloud computing category. AWS often appears superior due to its flexible pricing models, making it economical for startups and established enterprises. Azure Red Hat OpenShift, though pricier, stands out for businesses focusing on multi-cloud strategies and Kubernetes-centric environments.

Features: AWS offers scalable services, strong integration capabilities, and robust security features. Key attributes include Auto Scaling, EC2 instances, and dynamic pricing options. Azure Red Hat OpenShift features advanced multi-cloud application development, deployment, and hybrid cloud capabilities, making it ideal for businesses requiring infrastructure flexibility.

Room for Improvement: AWS could enhance its customization options and streamline its complex documentation for easier navigation. There's also room for more region-specific features to cater to diverse markets. Azure Red Hat OpenShift may benefit from more cost-effective pricing models, better integration with more third-party services, and simplified user management processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS facilitates deployment with comprehensive documentation and training resources, benefiting enterprises with varied support channels. Azure Red Hat OpenShift focuses on streamlined deployment with an intensive focus on Kubernetes, appealing to those needing specialized container management solutions.

Pricing and ROI: AWS's flexible pricing models are cost-effective, ensuring a strong ROI by only charging for resources consumed, which benefits startups and established enterprises. In contrast, Azure Red Hat OpenShift, despite higher initial costs, offers significant ROI for companies leveraging its advanced Kubernetes and multi-cloud features, translating pricing into value for flexibility and specialization.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

260

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (2nd)

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Amazon AWS is 13.8%, up from 12.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon AWS	13.8%
Azure Red Hat OpenShift	1.2%
Other	85.0%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Asif Meem

Senior Machine Learning Engineer at sportsbet

Managed cloud services have helped accelerate experiments with flexible configuration options

Sometimes the costs associated with spinning up a service, especially managed services, have implications. For example, if I create a Glue job, that will create S3 buckets and other resources that have cost implications, but once I clean up a Glue job, it does not delete the other accessory resources. Sometimes, I have to go hunting for what resources Amazon AWS might have provisioned and how it is costing behind the scenes. It can be complex depending on your level of expertise. It is not as easy to get started, especially when it comes to secure practices. Amazon AWS is more hands-on than other platforms.

Read full review

DeepakMishra

CEO, Head of Sales and Business Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Integrated cloud platform has streamlined app delivery and supported certified marketplace products

A potential area for improvement for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is to see managed identity support and ensure that some of the security features are not conflicting with Azure or Azure product features. I am sure in the future it will be more templatized so that we need not depend on Azure security features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift should be independent of Azure security features with respect to container scan and all that. Why would it use an Azure security feature? That is what I find. It is still yet to be GA and commonly available, but that is a strong reason for improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Accelerates innovation through fast experimentation cycles in an agile, flexible, and scalable platform."

"The ease of use is the biggest benefit."

"We are very happy with its capabilities."

"The main feature that I like the most is the variety of solutions that it provides. It provides some analysis, business information and more. It provides a wide variety of services."

"This solution is stable and reliable."

"Security, quick deployment, and scalability are the top three features for me."

"Amazon AWS is a stable solution."

"We are loving this solution so far, and it has certainly reduced the time it takes to stack up new applications."

More Amazon AWS pros

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"The functions and features in Azure Red Hat OpenShift that I have found most valuable are that it is a platform that is baked into Azure, and since it is baked into Azure, it is managed operation by Azure, which takes out the complexity of the infrastructure management and day two operations when compared with on-premise OpenShift."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"As a consulting company, we implement Azure Red Hat OpenShift for our clients, who appreciate its integration capabilities for enhancing cloud operations. While we handle implementation, build processes, and automation, the operational responsibility lies with the customer. The service provides basic processes and support from Red Hat and Microsoft, which benefits clients by allowing them to focus on their business rather than regular operations like cluster upgrades."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"AWS cloud has an issue with accessibility to the customer, it's very limited and if there's an internal issue, we won't know about it because they don't expose their APIs to many things."

"The price could be better."

"They could lower the cost. The setup could also be easier."

"I think the price can be improved. The price is high now, and Amazon's web portal can be improved."

"The availability could be better."

"User personalization and robotic process automation services need to be mature enough. More APIs are required for robotic process automation services. Azure is more mature in terms of user personalization and robotic process automation services. The document processing can also be better. Whenever we want to do any kind of document management, I try to do OCR, ICR, etc. The functionality in AWS has to be more like that."

"AWS is generally reliable, but we've seen a lot of issues lately, so I would say they have some room for improvement."

"The networking is overly complex."

More Amazon AWS cons

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

"Automation could be improved."

"I would rate the technical support from Microsoft as six."

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is comparable if you add in the price structure to an on-prem solution."

"For our infrastructure, the cost is approximately $25 per device, and you have to include the other tools that we have in the cloud, for a total of approximately $200,000 per year."

"It is quite expensive in my very personal opinion. Going on-prem in a data center is, for sure, not as expensive as going to AWS, but when it comes to a point where you are raising and growing, it simply makes a lot of sense to stay in AWS. It is awesome in that way. I am not aware of any extra costs."

"One of the best-kept ways to reduce costs is to develop it on serverless technologies with AWS Lambda, SNS, DynamoDB, and S3."

"Amazon AWS could have more options and transparency in its pricing model. You need in-depth knowledge to adopt AWS. So someone without that knowledge base might not understand all of the costs associated with AWS."

"The price can be better."

"The solution is expensive compared to other providers because you need many of the services and it can add up fast."

"Pricing is an area that can be improved because it is very complicated. It considers the number of processes, bandwidth, and different kinds of usage. This makes it difficult to predict."

More Amazon AWS pricing and cost advice

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	131
Midsize Enterprise	48
Large Enterprise	120

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...

See all answers

Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure

We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

My use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is for an employee engagement application and HR, and I have also used it for an agentic bot.

See all answers

Comparisons

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon AWS

Compared 21% of the time

Dell ObjectScale vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Business Technology Platform vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Amazon AWS

Compared 4% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Amazon AWS

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon AWS Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 20% of the time

Google Cloud vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

Google App Engine vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS

August 2026

Download Amazon AWS product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

August 2026

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Also Known As

Amazon Web Services, AWS

No data available

Overview

Amazon AWS offers cloud services known for ease of use, scalability, and diverse services such as EC2, S3, and Lambda. Its pay-as-you-go pricing and robust security features make it a preferred choice for businesses managing growing demands efficiently.

Amazon AWS provides a comprehensive ecosystem with services like EC2 for computing, S3 for storage, and Lambda for serverless computing. It emphasizes scalability and quick resource provisioning, allowing businesses to handle IT workloads, host websites, and manage analytics seamlessly. AWS integrates a wide range of services, enhancing flexibility and reliability while offering robust security and automated management to streamline operations.

What are the most important features of Amazon AWS?

EC2: Offers scalable computing capacity in the cloud to manage business applications efficiently.
S3: Provides highly secure, durable, and scalable cloud storage solutions for data archiving and backup.
Lambda: Enables running code without provisioning or managing servers, improving application deployment.
Pricing: Employs a pay-as-you-go model, allowing cost-effective resource usage.
Security: Implements comprehensive security protocols to ensure data protection across services.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Supports business growth by easily scaling resources according to demand.
Integration: Offers seamless integration capabilities with numerous services, enhancing operational flexibility.
Performance: Provides stable and reliable performance for critical IT workloads and applications.
Management: Features automated management tools that reduce overhead and improve deployment efficiency.

Amazon AWS is widely implemented across industries for cloud computing, infrastructure hosting, and data storage. Businesses in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors leverage AWS for running applications, hosting analytics databases, and deploying scalable solutions. By utilizing tools like EC2, S3, and Lambda, they ensure flexibility and security in infrastructure management and data applications, meeting diverse operational needs effectively.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides enterprises with enhanced cloud-native flexibility and supports efficient multi-cloud migrations, simplifying infrastructure management, security, and patching.

Enterprises find Azure Red Hat OpenShift valuable for its advanced GUI, service mesh, automatic scaling, and integration capabilities. It aids regulatory compliance and streamlines application development with its DevOps integration, reducing release cycle times. The platform is appreciated for scalability, accessibility, and resilience. Users highlight its straightforward configuration, though improvements in the licensing model, cost-effectiveness, CLI, and support for data-intensive applications are needed. Orchestration, compatibility with new frameworks, and Azure dependency are areas for refinement. Built-in CI/CD tools are preferred over third-party solutions.

What are the key features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

Advanced GUI: Intuitive interface for streamlined management.
Service Mesh: Simplifies microservices management.
Automatic Scaling: Efficiently manages resources to meet demand.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with enterprise systems.
DevOps: Reduces release cycle time with unique integration.

Why consider Azure Red Hat OpenShift for your enterprise?

Cloud-Native Flexibility: Enhances adaptability for applications.
Security and Compliance: Aids in regulatory adherence.
Infrastructure Management: Simplifies with automation.
Scalability and Resilience: Handles workloads efficiently.

Businesses deploy Azure Red Hat OpenShift for pipeline management, containerized applications, and cloud migration. It supports banking operations, corporate integrations, and digital business development. Enterprises use it for Apache deployment in cloud platforms, advised by consultants transitioning from Broadcom to OpenShift.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

August 2026

Free Report: Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.