Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 13.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon AWS

Read 259 Amazon AWS reviews

18,717 Views
8,048 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 11 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

642 Views
603 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon AWS

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Amazon AWS and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are leading platforms in the cloud computing category. AWS often appears superior due to its flexible pricing models, making it economical for startups and established enterprises. Azure Red Hat OpenShift, though pricier, stands out for businesses focusing on multi-cloud strategies and Kubernetes-centric environments.

Features: AWS offers scalable services, strong integration capabilities, and robust security features. Key attributes include Auto Scaling, EC2 instances, and dynamic pricing options. Azure Red Hat OpenShift features advanced multi-cloud application development, deployment, and hybrid cloud capabilities, making it ideal for businesses requiring infrastructure flexibility.

Room for Improvement: AWS could enhance its customization options and streamline its complex documentation for easier navigation. There's also room for more region-specific features to cater to diverse markets. Azure Red Hat OpenShift may benefit from more cost-effective pricing models, better integration with more third-party services, and simplified user management processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS facilitates deployment with comprehensive documentation and training resources, benefiting enterprises with varied support channels. Azure Red Hat OpenShift focuses on streamlined deployment with an intensive focus on Kubernetes, appealing to those needing specialized container management solutions.

Pricing and ROI: AWS's flexible pricing models are cost-effective, ensuring a strong ROI by only charging for resources consumed, which benefits startups and established enterprises. In contrast, Azure Red Hat OpenShift, despite higher initial costs, offers significant ROI for companies leveraging its advanced Kubernetes and multi-cloud features, translating pricing into value for flexibility and specialization.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

259

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (2nd)

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Amazon AWS is 13.2%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon AWS	13.2%
Azure Red Hat OpenShift	1.0%
Other	85.8%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Asif Meem

Senior Machine Learning Engineer at sportsbet

Managed cloud services have helped accelerate experiments with flexible configuration options

Sometimes the costs associated with spinning up a service, especially managed services, have implications. For example, if I create a Glue job, that will create S3 buckets and other resources that have cost implications, but once I clean up a Glue job, it does not delete the other accessory resources. Sometimes, I have to go hunting for what resources Amazon AWS might have provisioned and how it is costing behind the scenes. It can be complex depending on your level of expertise. It is not as easy to get started, especially when it comes to secure practices. Amazon AWS is more hands-on than other platforms.

Read full review

DeepakMishra

CEO, Head of Sales and Business Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Integrated cloud platform has streamlined app delivery and supported certified marketplace products

A potential area for improvement for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is to see managed identity support and ensure that some of the security features are not conflicting with Azure or Azure product features. I am sure in the future it will be more templatized so that we need not depend on Azure security features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift should be independent of Azure security features with respect to container scan and all that. Why would it use an Azure security feature? That is what I find. It is still yet to be GA and commonly available, but that is a strong reason for improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature that I like the most is the variety of solutions that it provides. It provides some analysis, business information and more. It provides a wide variety of services."

"It streamlines tasks like table creation and data loading into Redshift, making the process more efficient and manageable."

"It is very easy to set up. It is also easy to use. It has a lot of services and integrations. We've been able to integrate whatever we need until now."

"It integrates well."

"It offers durability, high availability, fault tolerance, and a high TCO benefit."

"The solution can scale quite well."

"The stability is magnificent, it's spectacular."

"They are enterprising and pretty good in terms of features. It has good security. Its availability is also pretty good. It is available everywhere in the world. It has pretty good integrations, and it is working well. They have done a lot of improvements, and its UI has improved a lot."

More Amazon AWS pros

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"I'd like to see AWS implement consolidated billing for businesses operating under one group. We want to consolidate the functionalities but keep the billing separate. That is a challenge we've faced, and I feel it's something they can improve on. For example, maybe you have three businesses that are operating under one group, and you want each entity to have a separate bill for the respective workload that they're using."

"User personalization and robotic process automation services need to be mature enough. More APIs are required for robotic process automation services. Azure is more mature in terms of user personalization and robotic process automation services. The document processing can also be better. Whenever we want to do any kind of document management, I try to do OCR, ICR, etc. The functionality in AWS has to be more like that."

"This solution could offer more security."

"The customization could improve. However, it depends on the customization needed."

"One of the problems that I have seen is that some of the products are not as mature as others."

"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Requires better integration with other cloud products."

"In some scenarios, Azure will support hybrid cloud better while AWS offers direct connection."

More Amazon AWS cons

"I would rate the technical support from Microsoft as six."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

"Automation could be improved."

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

"The product is expensive."

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A few of our customers pay for it yearly and monthly. Sometimes, when it's related to the data, the pricing seems to be high. It could be cheaper on a transactional basis."

"You are not paying a licensing fee, you pay for consumption."

"We are happy with the pricing."

"The prices are somewhat on the higher side. It would help if they can bring it down, especially for the sporting segment and for on-demand instances."

"When I first started using the solution I used a free trial, and then we upgraded to a pay-as-you-go subscription. We have an allocated budget of $50."

"Amazon AWS is a bit more expensive than Oracle."

"We are currently paying for the solution on an annual basis."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee. It's below $100 a month."

More Amazon AWS pricing and cost advice

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	131
Midsize Enterprise	48
Large Enterprise	114

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...

See all answers

Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure

We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

My use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is for an employee engagement application and HR, and I have also used it for an agentic bot.

See all answers

Comparisons

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon AWS

Compared 34% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

Dell ObjectScale vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon AWS Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 23% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 11% of the time

Google App Engine vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS

February 2026

Download Amazon AWS product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

February 2026

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Also Known As

Amazon Web Services, AWS

No data available

Overview

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is an adopted cloud platform that offers more than 200 fully featured services from data centers located across the globe. This is a scalable, low-cost infrastructure platform in the cloud that is utilized by thousands of businesses of different sizes around the world. The product offers a wide variety of solutions for its customers, which allows them to launch applications regardless of their industry.

The most common use cases for AWS are:

Application hosting: Clients can take advantage of on-demand infrastructure to power their applications. The product supports multiple types of apps, varying from hosted internal applications to software as a service (SaaS) offerings.
Websites: With AWS, clients can satisfy their web hosting needs through a scalable platform for their websites.
Backup and storage: AWS offers reliable data storage services, which allow clients to store their data and build dependable backups for all of their valuable information.
Enterprise IT: The product allows companies to host internal- or external-facing IT applications in a highly secure environment.
Content delivery: Users who want to distribute content to end users worldwide can do so quickly and easily through the high data transfer speeds of this solution.
Databases: AWS offers a variety of database solutions, which include hosted enterprise database software as well as non-relational database solutions.

Amazon AWS supports a global cloud infrastructure with AWS Region and Availability Zone models, which contribute to the high availability of enterprise applications running on the solution. Amazon AWS has an extensive array of products that serve different purposes, including:

Analytics
Application integration
Blockchain
Business applications
Cloud financial management
Compute
Contact center
Containers
Database
Developer tools
End-user computing
Front-end web and mobile
Games
Internet of Things (IoT)
Machine learning
Management and governance
Quantum technologies
Robotics
Satellite
Security, identity and compliance, and others

The products and services that Amazon AWS delivers to these sectors provide a large computing capacity which is quicker and cheaper compared to building a physical server farm. Among the most popular services are Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, also known as "EC2," and Amazon Simple Storage Service, also known as "S3."

Amazon AWS Features

The wide array of products that Amazon AWS offers consist of different functions that utilize cloud computing across different sectors. The features of this solution can be categorized in the following ways:

Data and relationship management: With Amazon AWS, companies can manage multiple hierarchies of directory data, they can define attributes for objects and relationships, set custom inheritance rules for directories, and create multiple schemas.
Schema management: This group of features allows users to extend their directory schema according to their needs. They can extend it through multiple applications that share a single directory while avoiding duplication of data.
Fully managed infrastructure: This feature decreases time and costs for administrative tasks for companies regarding scaling infrastructure and managing servers.
Searching feature: The Cloud Directory feature of AWS offers built-in search capabilities which can cover sets of highly connected data and eliminate the need of creating nested queries.
Built-in data encryption: Users can benefit from high levels of protection of their data with AWS's products. The data in the cloud is automatically encrypted at rest and in transit through 256-bit encryption keys, managed by AWS Key Management Service (KMS).
Object policies: This feature allows Amazon AWS users to organize objects in different hierarchies by providing a framework for applications to evaluate policy assignments.

Amazon AWS Benefits

This product delivers various benefits across all industries that utilize its services. The greatest advantages of using Amazon AWS include:

High product functionality is supported by machine learning, artificial intelligence (AI), IoT, data lakes, and analytics.
The solution has a high level of security, which is backed by a deep set ofmore than 100 cloud security tools.
Amazon AWS has an easy-to-use interface that makes it possible for clients to host applications.
The product is very flexible in terms of which operating system, programming language, web app platform, and database clients can use.
AWS is a scalable and highly secure global computing infrastructure, supported by the reliability of Amazon.com.
Clients can utilize the Auto Scaling and Elastic Load Balancing tools to personally scale up or down applications, depending on their demand.
Users can choose from an array of payment options, including paying for only the services they need, as well as a free trial to select the ones most useful for them.

Reviews from Real Users

Greg G., a chief executive officer at a tech services company, ranks Amazon AWS highly, as he states that the solution is flexible, scales well, and offers good stability.

A technology manager technology at a computer software company values Amazon AWS because it is extremely cost-efficient, easy to upgrade and expand storage with greatly improved interfaces.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. Kubernetes is at the core of Red Hat OpenShift. OpenShift brings added-value features to complement Kubernetes, making it a turnkey container platform as a service (PaaS) with a significantly improved developer and operator experience.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

February 2026

Free Report: Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.