Azure Resource Manager vs Idira Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and Idira by Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Cloud Resource Access Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Microsoft holds a 20.1% mindshare in CRAM, compared to Idira by Palo Alto Networks’s 17.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Azure Resource Manager

Read 9 Azure Resource Manager reviews

890 Views
890 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Idira Identity

Read 29 Idira Identity reviews

11,305 Views
226 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Azure Resource Manager

Idira Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

CyberArk Identity and Azure Resource Manager operate in the identity and resource management category. CyberArk Identity has the upper hand due to its focus on identity protection and granular access control.

Features: CyberArk Identity enhances security through adaptive MFA, password management, and session monitoring. Its robust integration capabilities support compliance with complex standards. Azure Resource Manager efficiently manages deployments using ARM templates and Azure Blueprints, providing powerful resource management tools.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk Identity could benefit from simplified integrations, improved UI, and enhanced scaling and third-party integration flexibility. Azure Resource Manager should enhance heterogeneous cloud integration and improve role management efficiency to boost multi-cloud usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Identity supports varied deployments, from on-premises to hybrid clouds, though this complexity may challenge some users. Feedback on its support is mixed, ranging from excellent to needing improvement. Azure Resource Manager's cloud-focused deployment simplifies infrastructure setup but could enhance multi-cloud support. Its customer service is widely regarded as efficient, benefiting from Microsoft's extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Identity has a higher upfront cost, justified by its extensive security features and user management efficiencies, leading to significant operational savings. Azure Resource Manager, with its pay-as-you-go model, offers initial affordability, potentially escalating costs with service expansion, especially for multi-cloud needs. Both systems promise substantial ROI by lowering penalties and boosting user efficiency, despite differing pricing models.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Resource Manager vs. Idira Identity Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager vs. Idira Identity

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Resource Manager

Ranking in Cloud Resource Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Idira Identity

Ranking in Cloud Resource Access Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (8th), Identity Management (IM) (8th), Authorization Software (2nd), Enterprise Password Managers (10th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud Resource Access Management category, the mindshare of Azure Resource Manager is 20.1%, up from 18.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Idira Identity is 17.1%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Resource Access Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Resource Manager	20.1%
Idira Identity	17.1%
Other	62.8%

Cloud Resource Access Management

Featured Reviews

MohammedAbdulAleem

Lead Enterprise Architect at Integrated Telecom

Provides unified resource visibility and supports compliance requirements

Azure Resource Manager can be improved in several ways. It should support heterogeneous cloud integration. For example, if I have a cloud management portal from a private cloud provider such as Morpheus from HPE or other private cloud portals, and Azure Resource Manager could integrate with other clouds to give us unified resource utilization or management, that would be really good. Currently, it supports only Microsoft to Microsoft backend and does not support heterogeneous environments; it only supports homogeneous ones. Looking towards the future, I would like to see additional features or improvements in Azure Resource Manager because nowadays companies are going with a multi-cloud model. I am looking for unification of other clouds inside Azure Resource Manager.

Read full review

Radosław Szyszko

Security Consultant at Clico

Modern access controls have streamlined daily MFA use and support complex privileged workflows

The area that is missing much is about the reporting part. I would rate Idira Identity in general about eight. It has a good set of features compared to other identity security platforms. It's well-composed on different layers but requires platformization to go further to make it easier to use. You can do many things in it, but you need a lot of knowledge about dependencies of many things, so it requires time and big knowledge, and for the customer, it's a tough task now. It was very bad in the past. Now it's going better, and I expect that this platformization transition will help in succeeding more in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Azure Resource Manager's Role-Based Access Control and ARM tagging features are excellent."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy, as the documentation and information were very good."

"The solution is user friendly and it's easy to manage reserve incentives and to automate resources."

"My experience with Azure Resource Manager is fantastic; it provides me with a complete landscape of Azure Stack Hub, giving me complete visibility into compute, network, storage, security, and consumed IPs, all of which I can visualize."

"On the management side, Azure Resource Manager helps with things like team management. It also helps on the expert side. It helps us manage projects and services centrally, and it's very useful."

"The most valuable feature is the vast resources available online."

"The Azure Resource Manager is complete, where we can manage all the resources."

"Azure Resource Manager is extremely user-friendly and easy to deploy and understand."

More Azure Resource Manager pros

"CyberArk Identity is at the top."

"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."

"What I like most about CyberArk Identity is the model that is in place."

"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."

"The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."

"The features are really powerful, providing really good SSO and MFA features and implementation capability, plus an MDM solution, and the cloud-based setup is simple and scalable."

"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."

More Idira Identity pros

Cons

"Azure Resource Manager can be improved in several ways. It should support heterogeneous cloud integration."

"It would be helpful if they would create a common line within the user interface so that if you want to automate or scale a reserve deployment, it can be done simply."

"Unlike Terraform, Azure Resource Manager is hard to maintain and modularize and has room for improvement."

"Lacks a common line within the user interface for automating or scaling a reserve deployment."

"They should focus more on AI features such as Copilot."

"I'm not at all happy with their support. Over the years, whenever we raised an issue, we never got clear and understandable support."

"Compared to ARM templates, Terraform is often preferred because it is more versatile and user-friendly. With Terraform, you can create a single, generic script that works across multiple cloud environments, including AWS, Azure, GCP, and even Oracle Cloud. This eliminates the need to write separate scripts for each platform."

"They have created multiple roles, but I would rather they simplify the roles they already have. The main goal is to work with efficient data. Their support could also be better."

More Azure Resource Manager cons

"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."

"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."

"I faced some challenges during the initial setup of CyberArk Identity. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components."

"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."

"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."

"The reporting functionality is somewhat complicated. While I would rate CyberArk Identity and Okta on the same level, Okta's reporting is crisper and clearer."

"You can do many things in it, but you need a lot of knowledge about dependencies of many things, so it requires time and big knowledge, and for the customer, it's a tough task now."

"One area for improvement is the complexity of the learning curve for new users."

More Idira Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source."

"We pay $15,000 to $20,000 a month for the service and it is worth the cost."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

More Idira Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Resource Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Resource Manager?

About the pricing, it is expensive. Maintaining Azure Stack Hub is not easy because it is expensive, though it depends on customer to customer. If the customer is looking for a secure, compliant cl...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Resource Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Resource Manager?

In dealing with something like Site Recovery or Azure Bastion or Azure AI Foundry, we are having a very minimal type of implementation that is only four nodes. Microsoft Azure Resource Manager is b...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CyberArk Identity?

I'm working with on-premises solutions. Back in the time there were no other options. I use multi-factor authentication with Idira Identity. I sell it, I deploy it, so it's something that is really...

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Resource Manager vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 23% of the time

Alibaba Cloud Resource Access Management vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 20% of the time

AWS Resource Access Manager vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 18% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Identity and Access Management vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Resource Manager Competitors

Okta Platform vs Idira Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Idira Identity

Compared 4% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Idira Identity

Compared 4% of the time

1Password Business vs Idira Identity

Compared 3% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Idira Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Idira Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager

October 2026

Download Azure Resource Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Idira Identity

October 2026

Download Idira Identity product report

Also Known As

No data available

Idaptive

Overview

Azure Resource Manager manages and provisions cloud resources efficiently with features like ARM templates and role-based access control. It integrates seamlessly with Azure and supports projects across different environments, enhancing automation and governance.

Azure Resource Manager serves as a centralized platform for managing and provisioning resources, employing templates and governance policies for standardization and compliance. Its integration with Azure and user-friendly interface makes resource management straightforward, offering robust security through RBAC policies and a comprehensive view of services. The platform supports migration, infrastructure management, data integration, and Azure DevOps functionalities. Users often leverage PowerShell or Terraform to manage resources efficiently.

What are the key features of Azure Resource Manager?

Azure Blueprints: Facilitates template definition and policy integration for standardized deployments.
ARM Templates: Provides flexibility and ease in DevOps workflows.
Centralized Management: Enables centralized resource management with effective role-based access control.
Compliance Standards: Ensures robust compliance with governance policies.
Scalability and Deployment: Simplifies deployment and scalability processes.

What benefits should users consider in Azure Resource Manager reviews?

Resource Management Efficiency: Enhances project management efficiency and resource automation.
Security and Governance: Strengthens security with RBAC and ensures compliance.
Integration and Support: Offers seamless integration with Azure and extensive support resources.
Cost and Latency: Users seek improvements in cost efficiency and latency reduction.
Multi-cloud Flexibility: Room for improvement in multi-cloud environment flexibility.

Azure Resource Manager is widely used across industries to streamline cloud resource management, ensuring compliance and standardization. Financial institutions leverage its security features to safeguard data, while healthcare utilizes it for managing infrastructure. Technology companies benefit from its automation capabilities, optimizing workflow efficiency in deployment and operations.

Microsoft

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager vs. Idira Identity

September 2026

Free Report: Azure Resource Manager vs. Idira Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Resource Manager vs. Idira Identity and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Resource Manager vs. Idira Identity report.

See our list of best Cloud Resource Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Resource Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.