No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Comodo cWatch comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Web Application F...
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Comodo cWatch
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
38th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
CDN (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Barracuda Web Application Firewall is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comodo cWatch is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Barracuda Web Application Firewall1.8%
Comodo cWatch1.4%
Other96.8%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2797602 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Security Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Advanced application protection has reduced manual monitoring and improved attack visibility
For example, if we consider a company that has an application with a payment gateway configured, which provides services including money transactions, we deploy Barracuda Web Application Firewall for that application. We host the service in Barracuda Web Application Firewall. When a client requests access to the application, the request goes to Barracuda Web Application Firewall first, which will verify the request contents and create a separate TCP connection to the backend server if the request is legitimate. This process protects against attacks including SQL injection or cross-site scripting, where Barracuda Web Application Firewall will block any request that matches attack signatures. The reporting features are quite good as they have reporting charts and dashboards that provide lists of attacks and real-time verification of those attacks, helping in better reporting by tracking requests based on time and unique endpoints. I believe URL Profiles and Website Profiles are the most unique features offered. They create separate endpoints for each request integrated with the application, providing different security profiles based on the requirements. Moreover, the learning feature is very comprehensive, allowing us to monitor the applications before switching to protect mode, creating automatic profiles based on learned traffic, which helps to fine-tune security policy. Barracuda Web Application Firewall's user interface automates the blocking of malicious IP addresses, reducing the manual burden. Additionally, enabling the learning feature allows for quick preparation of security profiles, creating URL profiles automatically, which significantly reduces manual intervention and false positives.
Bernardo Murillo - PeerSpot reviewer
Director De Netquatro at Netquatro
Alerts organizations if any malware is detected and removes it quickly
The solution allows me to change my logo. It gives me a white-label portal because I am a partner. OWASP has been the most effective in malware prevention. It can detect if the headers are okay and do FTP scans. We get alerts if we have some malware. It is removed very quickly.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It significantly improved our overall web security posture, addressing intrusions and enhancing control over web URLs in our environment."
"We find that its features provide us with solutions for practically all our needs."
"The Barracuda Web Application Firewall is more than perfect."
"Barracuda Web Application Firewall's features fulfill our requirements well, preventing us from needing to switch to more expensive vendors while still meeting our needs effectively."
"The solution's most valuable feature is that it actually protects our website, and it provides all the required security functions."
"This solution is very stable."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, especially if you enlist assistance."
"One of the best aspects of the solution is the support provided."
"They took my website under their surveillance, scanned the website for infection, detected the incident, and removed it in a jiff."
"We get alerts if we have some malware."
"The solution is very good and I feel more secure under this than I did under Symantec or McAfee."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"My customers see ROI in the sense that their whole environment is secure."
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
 

Cons

"The solution needs to leverage some additional features to a broader scale of software-defined networks."
"I would like to see a native multi-cloud cover."
"The policy updates could be improved."
"The documentation is lacking. It's not like what you'd get if you were using Juniper or Cisco. They need to expand on it and make it more useful."
"I am not satisfied with the technical support from Barracuda. I am somewhat disappointed with the technical support that I have received so far."
"I have issues with the load balancing of the solution which is slow. The connection pooling in Barracuda also doesn't work. There is an issue when someone needs access to a site quickly. The issue is with HTTPS services. I am not sure if they have changed all these in the solution’s latest version."
"The platform's pricing needs improvement."
"If you know nothing about networks, then you can't set it up."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"The portal is a little slow."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"Better CDN could be a great thing since this is the best that any website owners would be interested in for protecting their website."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is inexpensive."
"The price of this solution is okay."
"In my opinion, the product is fairly priced."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"Cost is a bit on the higher side. Big companies can afford it."
"The Barracuda Web Application Firewall is quite expensive."
"Our licensing fees are paid annually and the cost is between €600 and €800 (approximately $665.00 to $885.00 USD)."
"The product is expensive."
"Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, costs $7."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Barracuda Web Application Firewall?
My main use case for Barracuda Web Application Firewall is utilizing it in the areas of perimeter security, load balancing, and deploying it on the cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments, whic...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Web Application Firewall?
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Barracuda Web Application Firewall are reasonable. They are competitive when compared to other vendors including F5 and Imperva, who tend to have higher p...
What needs improvement with Barracuda Web Application Firewall?
I think Barracuda Web Application Firewall can be improved by providing more information around data integrity control, which would be interesting to see.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
cWatch
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oracle, CBS, Pioneer, Hyundai, Publix, Barnes Noble, Calzedonia, Nordstrom, Samsung, Nascar
Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Comodo cWatch and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.