QlikView and Birst are major players in the business intelligence space. While QlikView offers compelling pricing and support, Birst's superior features provide a competitive advantage through robust functionality.
Features: QlikView's associative data model supports quick insights and customizable solutions, allowing data integration from multiple sources. Its ease of use and powerful ETL capabilities facilitate efficient data analysis. Birst offers cloud architecture enabling agile data modeling and advanced analytics within integrated applications. Its comprehensive cloud-based solution and automated data management significantly enhance innovation and feature breadth.
Room for Improvement: QlikView could benefit from improved data visualization options to match contemporary aesthetics and better scalability for cloud-based deployments. Enhancing intuitive design elements would improve user interaction. Birst's interface can be overly complex, which creates a learning curve for new users. Enhancements in offline access and reduction of initial setup time are necessary for its cloud-based deployments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView provides straightforward on-premise deployment with strong customer support, though cloud deployment options lag. Birst excels with a cloud-first deployment model, streamlined implementation, and responsive customer service, making it appealing for businesses aiming for seamless rollouts.
Pricing and ROI: QlikView incurs lower initial setup costs, offering attractive ROI with effective scalability. Birst might involve higher setup costs, yet its comprehensive capabilities deliver substantial long-term ROI, especially for data-driven strategies. Their unique strengths cater to different financial and operational goals.
The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.
I would rate the customer support a solid 10.
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.
The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.
The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.
Birst Networked BI and Analytics eliminates information silos. Decentralized users can augment the enterprise data model virtually, as opposed to physically, without compromising data governance.
A unified semantic layer maintains common definitions and key metrics.
Birst’s two-tier architecture aligns back-end sources with line-of-business or local data. Birst’s Automated Data Refinement extracts data from any source into a unified semantic layer. Users are enabled with self-service analytics through executive dashboards, reporting, visual discovery, mobile tools, and predictive analytics. Birst Open Client Interface also offers integration with Tableau, Excel and R.
Birst goes to market in two primary ways: as a direct sale, for enterprises using Birst on internal data to manage their business; and embedded, for companies who offer analytic products, by embedding and white-labeling Birst capabilities into their products.
Birst’s is packaged in 3 available formats: Platform and per-user fee; by Department or Business Unit; by end-customer (for embedded scenarios).
QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
