BizTalk Server vs Oracle BPEL comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 6.8, while Oracle is ranked #34 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 1.1% mindshare in PA, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 16 BizTalk Server reviews

1,370 Views
699 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Oracle BPEL

Read 4 Oracle BPEL reviews

746 Views
746 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

Oracle BPEL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BizTalk Server and Oracle BPEL are both enterprise integration tools. BizTalk Server is better suited for Microsoft environments with robust integration and transaction support, while Oracle BPEL offers superior orchestration and flexibility across multiple platforms.

Features: BizTalk Server provides strong integration with Microsoft environments, reliable transaction processing, and an intuitive mapper tool for data transformation. Oracle BPEL offers powerful process orchestration capabilities, compliance with industry standards, and support for human tasks and error handling.

Room for Improvement: BizTalk Server could improve by expanding integration capabilities beyond Microsoft systems, enhancing orchestration depth, and providing more flexibility in handling multiple environments. Oracle BPEL could benefit from simplifying its deployment model, enhancing out-of-the-box Microsoft integrations, and improving user interface simplicity for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BizTalk Server ensures straightforward deployment within Microsoft ecosystems with comprehensive support services. Oracle BPEL requires a more complex setup due to its wide adaptability but offers extensive support for tackling complex environment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server typically features lower initial setup costs and offers a quicker ROI for businesses established in Microsoft systems. Oracle BPEL, with its higher setup costs, justifies investment through advanced features and long-term process efficiency values leading to high ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. Oracle BPEL Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. Oracle BPEL

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Process Automation

12th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (8th)

Oracle BPEL

Ranking in Process Automation

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPEL is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BizTalk Server	1.1%
Oracle BPEL	0.9%
Other	98.0%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Taqi-Hasan

Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution

Offers valuable integration services but requires better cloud adaptation

Biztalk server doesn't have API management so that our exposed can be protected against the SQL injection, DOS attacks. However, this is available in IBM WebMethods. The positive impact of BizTalk Server was initially limited because of scalability issues. That is the reason why management has decided to implement IBM WebMethods. We are going to decommission BizTalk Server next year. I believe the API response could be improved in BizTalk Server. We need to increase the number of servers in BizTalk Server. We used to have two servers; later on, we increased to a third server, which has improved performance. We can make it more highly available and scale out to improve BizTalk Server. Scale out means we can increase the number of servers horizontally.

Read full review

Posham Nampelli

Architecture and Consulting at Synaptics Inc

A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes

I'm a consultant. I do architecting, designing, and development. I have used two versions, 1.1 and 2.0. I’m unsure about the prices because I oversee the development and implementation. I'll highly recommend the product depending on an organization’s requirements. As someone who has worked with BPEL for 13 years, I highly recommend the product for an on-premise or hybrid integration. Multiple products or alternate solutions have come into the integration domain. However, the product has been in the industry from SOA 11g to SOA 12c and OIC. Though there are multiple competitors, the product has been here for a long time and has been helping multiple customers improve their business. Overall, I rate the solution a nine or nine and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation."

"Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers."

"The most valuable feature is its reliability and stability. The first version of BizTalk was released in 2000, and many companies still use it. It was stable until 2013 when we had support."

"Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market."

"The BizTalk Server business rule engine was very useful for us and has helped us for the last 12 years."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good."

"The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions."

"The BizTalk Server business rule engine was very useful for us and has helped us for the last 12 years."

More BizTalk Server pros

"The solution is very seamless and fast."

"The product has everything we need."

"The most valuable feature is the support for human tasks."

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

Cons

"The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities."

"It's an on-premises system, requiring physical servers for deployment. This is different from Azure; you don't need any servers with Azure. If you have a subscription, you can do whatever you want. There are unit restrictions based on the environment (like non-production vs. production) in BizTalk. You need physical servers and databases. In Azure, those are not required – it's all in the cloud."

"I didn't find anything particularly valuable in BizTalk Server. It didn't help me, and we are moving away from BizTalk Server to a new platform."

"BizTalk lacks native cloud support. BizTalk doesn't offer in-built support for cloud. We need to use third-party adapters to connect it to cloud services."

"We want to get rid of BizTalk Server, as there is unnecessary license cost, and there are some limitations, so we might go for Azure Integration Services."

"BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging."

"Updating things in BizTalk is a headache."

"The deployment could be simplified."

More BizTalk Server cons

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

"The solution's integration with SAP should be seamless because some formats are not accepted in SAP but are accepted in Oracle BPEL."

"They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."

"It was not cheap, but it was affordable."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost will depend on the client's requirements."

"BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."

"Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."

"The product is moderately priced."

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Performing Arts

14%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

I am generally satisfied with BizTalk Server, but there are some gaps, as we have multiple integration tools. Thus, there is associated cost, operation cost, license cost, and CapEx, so we are tryi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

I have not worked with Amazon API Gateway or Mule ESB; I am just testing them. I am using Boomi iPaaS and WebMethods. I did not purchase it on AWS Marketplace; those are product API systems, and in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPEL?

They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems. It should be better if the SAP adapter were included in the bundle.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle BPEL?

We primarily use Oracle BPEL for process automation. It is used for workflows for documents, data transfers, and other processes implemented for our customers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle BPEL?

It depends on your needs. Oracle BPEL is suitable for enterprise-wide systems. However, if you're building something smaller or don't know precisely what you need, it's better to start with somethi...

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 10% of the time

IBM BPM vs BizTalk Server

Compared 9% of the time

Camunda vs BizTalk Server

Compared 9% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

Flowable vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 31% of the time

Camunda vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 28% of the time

Control-M vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 25% of the time

Pega Platform vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 17% of the time

More Oracle BPEL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

January 2026

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

December 2025

Download Oracle BPEL product report

Also Known As

No data available

BPEL Process Manager

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

Oracle BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Process Manager is a tool for designing and running business processes. This product provides a comprehensive, standardsÂbased and easy to use solution for creating, deploying and managing crossÂapplication business processes with both automated and human workflow steps â all in a serviceÂoriented architecture. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a powerful integration tool for the enterprise. Its ability to connect to external systems and process, mixed with its support for a variety of presentation technologies makes it an ideal tool for defining and implementing business process logic.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP, Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Intelligent Pathways, DVZ Datenverarbeitungszentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GmbH, Arqiva

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. Oracle BPEL

December 2025

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. Oracle BPEL

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. Oracle BPEL and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. Oracle BPEL report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.