BizTalk Server vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Microsoft and Salesforce are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.1, while Salesforce is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 5.0% mindshare in BBM, compared to Salesforce’s 11.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 14 BizTalk Server reviews

587 Views
278 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

1,379 Views
743 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

BizTalk Server and MuleSoft Anypoint Platform compete in the integration space, with MuleSoft having an advantage due to its feature-rich environment and flexibility, justifying its higher price for many buyers.

Features: BizTalk Server excels in enterprise and business-to-business integration with strong data mapping and automated workflows, particularly for Microsoft environments. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers comprehensive API management, cloud compatibility, and a wide range of prebuilt connectors for greater integration flexibility. The key difference is MuleSoft's cloud-native design versus BizTalk's strong Microsoft integration.

Room for Improvement: BizTalk Server could enhance its cloud capabilities and reduce initial setup complexity to appeal to a broader audience. Additionally, expanding beyond Microsoft-focused integrations would be beneficial. For MuleSoft, reducing setup costs, simplifying the learning curve for new users, and improving on-premises functionalities are areas for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BizTalk Server traditionally requires significant infrastructure investment, offering strong Microsoft ecosystem support. MuleSoft's cloud and hybrid readiness allows for quicker scalability and modular deployments, focusing customer service on API development and deployment.

Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server appeals to those with existing Microsoft investments, offering potential ROI through lower setup costs. MuleSoft, despite higher initial costs, provides substantial ROI due to adaptability and scalability, making it attractive for businesses focused on API-led connectivity.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (14th)

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Workload Automation (4th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 5.0%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 11.1%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Vignesh Kumar Sekar

Senior Analyst at Sword Group

Enables message routing and provides a secure way to communicate between two systems

The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes. It enables a handshake with the source and target systems using certificates. It is the most secure way of communicating between two systems. It is an advantage. We can do a lot of message routing. If we want to handle large data, we can put the data into different patterns to process it. We can do it through sequential convoy or parallel convoy orchestration. BizTalk comes with SQL Server. We can load temporary data in the database and use the batch process from BizTalk. It is an added advantage. Creating agreements is a manual job, but it's quite easy in BizTalk. Even a fresh college graduate can configure AS2 certificates and partner profiles and communicate with other systems. It is easy.

Read full review

Tolulope A. Adeniji

Retired at a educational organization with 11-50 employees

Provides application integration and reduces time and effort during upgrades

One of the most valuable aspects was its impact on reducing time and effort during upgrades. Previously, SAP upgrades required significant coordination with multiple teams. Now, thanks to our streamlined integration approach, the SAP team interacts primarily with the integration team. When changes are needed, we simply create a new version. This allows application teams to migrate gradually from the old version to the new one, without extensive involvement from the SAP team. Moreover, our approach has improved reliability by eliminating duplicated efforts. Previously, different teams would often duplicate data sets due to inefficiencies in data naming conventions. We centralized data integration, ensuring that all applications use the same data set.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions."

"The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good."

"Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers."

"BIzTalk's integration with Visual Studio is the most valuable feature of this product."

"I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten."

"BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation."

"Compared to the current solutions I use, like Azure Logic Apps and other cloud services, BizTalk was far better and more reliable."

More BizTalk Server pros

"API management."

"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."

"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."

"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."

"It's easy to develop APIs."

"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."

"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."

"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"BizTalk is in the past, Microsoft is not going to evolve it any further or add any new features."

"It's an on-premises system, requiring physical servers for deployment. This is different from Azure; you don't need any servers with Azure. If you have a subscription, you can do whatever you want. There are unit restrictions based on the environment (like non-production vs. production) in BizTalk. You need physical servers and databases. In Azure, those are not required – it's all in the cloud."

"Updating things in BizTalk is a headache."

"The deployment could be simplified."

"It's a complex product because you have many degrees of freedom to connect different parts together. Whether it's sensible or not, is up to you, but the machine does allow it. But because of the vast degrees of freedom, it's complex."

"BizTalk lacks native cloud support. BizTalk doesn't offer in-built support for cloud. We need to use third-party adapters to connect it to cloud services."

"BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging."

"The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities."

More BizTalk Server cons

"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."

"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."

"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."

"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."

"Anypoint MQ could improve the user interface."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."

"One area for improvement is the Community Hub or developer portal, which should be part of the base offering."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost will depend on the client's requirements."

"BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."

"The solution is expensive."

"It was not cheap, but it was affordable."

"Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."

"BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The product is still very expensive."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"The solution has a high price."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

BizTalk Server has adapted to the changing needs of business over time with steady development, but there are new requirements, for example, on APIs, application programming interfaces. That functi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 15% of the time

Camunda vs BizTalk Server

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 10% of the time

Control-M vs BizTalk Server

Compared 9% of the time

Pega Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 6% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

June 2025

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

June 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

June 2025

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.