

Pega Platform and BizTalk Server are key players in the enterprise solution market. Pega Platform appears to have an upper hand due to its advanced cloud functionalities and no-code development abilities.
Features: Pega Platform enhances business transformation with features like rapid deployment, case management, and integration services. Additionally, it supports Pega Cloud for seamless operations. Meanwhile, BizTalk Server is recognized for its orchestration and XML transaction management capabilities. It efficiently manages complex enterprise environments through robust integration support.
Room for Improvement: Pega Platform may benefit from enhancing cloud features, refining UI customization, and simplifying low-code options to ease non-specialist use. Conversely, BizTalk Server could improve its cloud integration capabilities, scalability, and modern messaging features to compete in a cloud-centric market.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pega Platform provides flexible deployment options, including public and private cloud, promoting digital transformation with responsive customer service. However, upgrade support can improve. BizTalk Server presents deployment challenges typical of on-premises solutions. It offers satisfactory support but requires better handling of cloud-related queries and modernization.
Pricing and ROI: Pega Platform has a sophisticated pricing model that tends to be costly but offers significant ROI through reduced development time. BizTalk Server is also considered expensive yet cost-effective for structured integration frameworks. Both may pose financial challenges for SMEs, demanding evaluation of actual use cases.
BizTalk Server's ROI is comparatively higher than Boomi and Workato.
Now the direction is to move away from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods, which has more features compared to BizTalk Server.
I estimate that projects take days rather than weeks when using Pega Platform compared to traditional coding.
Pega Platform has positively impacted my organization, as they were using different technology before and have seen tremendous success and return on investment, so they are very happy.
The technical support from Pega is very low, rating a one or two out of ten.
I never needed support from the platform standpoint, but if additional features are required, we have regular meetings with the product team for feedback.
Pega's technical support team is very helpful.
It is time for low-code, no-code, and a quick go-to-market should be faster.
Currently, big banking providers and insurance providers, even the members for healthcare payers, are using more than millions of operations on a daily or weekly basis.
BizTalk Server is good for small companies but not for big companies.
BizTalk Server's stability rates about eight or nine out of ten.
BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages.
We initially planned to move to Azure Integration Services, but there are challenges with AIS, so now we are evaluating WebMethods IO.
There are always areas for improvement, which they are addressing in every part of the patch releases.
With the recent development of AI agents in Pega Platform 24.2, the adoption is not heavy due to regulations around using external LLM by customers, especially regulated customers in BFSS and healthcare.
Pega introduced Constellation, which allows a user to build a more engaging visual experience.
The only thing I heard is that it's not inexpensive.
Pega is priced higher than open-source options like Flowable but is suitable for large-scale industries like banking and insurance.
The pricing is expensive, and this is an issue.
From a licensing perspective, it is higher than the competition.
Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market.
BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation.
Pega Platform has positively impacted my organization by providing faster application development than traditional methods.
The best feature is case management, which is so automated and does most of the things out of the box without requiring a lot of customizations.
Pega Platform is excellent for enterprise-level solutions with integrations to entire systems, including case management, service orchestration, CRM, decision-making capabilities, digital process automation, and AI-driven functionalities.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Pega Platform | 5.2% |
| BizTalk Server | 1.1% |
| Other | 93.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
| Large Enterprise | 69 |
Pega Platform provides flexible business process management with a focus on rapid application development and automation through a low-code approach, enhancing efficiency across sectors.
Pega Platform is renowned for its ability to streamline operations with robust automation features, including robotic process automation and decision-making capabilities. Its intuitive interface and workflow management contribute to a reputation for enhancing business processes. Although users face challenges with integration limitations and high licensing costs, they benefit from rapid deployment and efficient process adaptations. The unified architecture reduces complexity, while case management and integration services support digital transformations in sectors such as banking, insurance, and healthcare.
What are the key features of Pega Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
In industries like insurance, banking, healthcare, and government, Pega Platform is implemented to automate diverse workflows, supporting initiatives from claims processing to customer onboarding. Enterprises use Pega for case management and digital transformations, valuing its out-of-the-box integrations and real-time reporting capabilities to boost operational automation and enhance customer experiences.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.