BizTalk Server vs IBM B2B Integrator comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.1, while IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. Microsoft holds a 5.0% mindshare in BBM, compared to IBM’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 14 BizTalk Server reviews

587 Views
278 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM B2B Integrator

Read 45 IBM B2B Integrator reviews

940 Views
413 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

IBM B2B Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

IBM B2B Integrator and BizTalk Server are leading business integration solutions, excelling in different domains. IBM B2B Integrator holds an edge with its security and adaptability, crucial for industries with high compliance demands, whereas BizTalk Server leverages strong integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, making it a preferred choice for Microsoft-centric environments.

Features: IBM B2B Integrator offers flexible multi-protocol integration, comprehensive error notification, and robust partner management, emphasizing its security layers and EDI standards support. BizTalk Server is noted for its dependable messaging and routing capabilities, seamless integration with Visual Studio, and effective support for intricate orchestrations.

Room for Improvement: IBM B2B Integrator requires enhancements in API capabilities, process visibility, and user interface simplication, as well as better IBM product suite integration and improved monitoring. BizTalk Server can benefit from performance upgrades, more straightforward message tracking, simplified deployments, and improved legacy architecture updating.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both IBM B2B Integrator and BizTalk Server mainly run on-premises. IBM also offers a hybrid cloud option, with its technical support being proficient but sometimes challenging to navigate. BizTalk Server users find Microsoft's support reliable yet occasionally needing more advanced assistance in complex scenarios. Customer service quality varies in response times.

Pricing and ROI: IBM B2B Integrator is viewed as a premium solution with a higher cost, justified by its functionality and security. It offers varied pricing models, including cloud options. BizTalk Server is more cost-effective, though additional expenses arise based on deployment needs. Both solutions provide substantial ROI when aligned with specific business requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. IBM B2B Integrator Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. IBM B2B Integrator

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (14th)

IBM B2B Integrator

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 5.0%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM B2B Integrator is 6.9%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Vignesh Kumar Sekar

Senior Analyst at Sword Group

Enables message routing and provides a secure way to communicate between two systems

The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes. It enables a handshake with the source and target systems using certificates. It is the most secure way of communicating between two systems. It is an advantage. We can do a lot of message routing. If we want to handle large data, we can put the data into different patterns to process it. We can do it through sequential convoy or parallel convoy orchestration. BizTalk comes with SQL Server. We can load temporary data in the database and use the batch process from BizTalk. It is an added advantage. Creating agreements is a manual job, but it's quite easy in BizTalk. Even a fresh college graduate can configure AS2 certificates and partner profiles and communicate with other systems. It is easy.

Read full review

Nagasaikiran Kesana

Senior Software Engineer at HCL Technologies

Fast, easy to use, and useful for integration purposes

In the initial stage, I used only business processes to build code. As I used the product more and more, I learned that we could monitor, perform support activities, and install and upgrade servers. We can learn how to manage the clients to get business. We must get into a call with customers and get their requirements. We must pass all the test cases, both positive and negative. We need to manage our team as well. We use various protocols for data security, like SFTP, FTP, and HTTP. We follow the security levels based on the customer’s requirements. We encrypt the file, and the customers decrypt it using the public and private keys we provide. Customers who need high security opt for HTTP certificates and AS2. I have also worked on AWS and Azure to pass files to the buckets. I also work on single sign-on authentication. External users can access our dashboard with a few details. For example, if our customers need to see whether a file is transferred from our end, they can easily log in to the details and monitor it. They can also perform health checks. I will recommend the tool to others. People who want to use the tool must not do anything blindly. They must analyze, learn the concept, and understand the purpose of the tool. There are other products in the market, like MuleSoft, that have the same functionality. We must understand why we are using IBM B2B Integrator. We must gather some information. I take some introductory classes for the new joiners in my organization. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers."

"BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good."

"We can handle a large number of messages without any issues, ensuring that everything runs smoothly."

"Compared to the current solutions I use, like Azure Logic Apps and other cloud services, BizTalk was far better and more reliable."

"The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes."

"The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions."

"The most valuable feature is its reliability and stability. The first version of BizTalk was released in 2000, and many companies still use it. It was stable until 2013 when we had support."

More BizTalk Server pros

"The solution is useful for transferring files from one format to another format. Also, the solution is useful in translation."

"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle."

"IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution."

"The solution is fast and easy to use."

"B2B provides a secure communication channel."

"Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders."

"The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility."

"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."

More IBM B2B Integrator pros

Cons

"It's an on-premises system, requiring physical servers for deployment. This is different from Azure; you don't need any servers with Azure. If you have a subscription, you can do whatever you want. There are unit restrictions based on the environment (like non-production vs. production) in BizTalk. You need physical servers and databases. In Azure, those are not required – it's all in the cloud."

"Updating things in BizTalk is a headache."

"BizTalk lacks native cloud support. BizTalk doesn't offer in-built support for cloud. We need to use third-party adapters to connect it to cloud services."

"BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging."

"The product's deployment can be quicker"

"The deployment could be simplified."

"BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages."

"The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities."

More BizTalk Server cons

"There should be a single place to do things, rather than making it complicated, not moving away and truncating the old features but instead coming up with the new and still keeping the old stuff confuses people sometimes."

"We often need to change property files for accounts, and I don't always have access to them. For core mapping, we need to install JDK"

"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."

"The product does not have default options for PDF generation."

"API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud."

"The reporting features could be better. right now, they are lacking a bit."

"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly."

"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."

More IBM B2B Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."

"The solution is expensive."

"It was not cheap, but it was affordable."

"The cost will depend on the client's requirements."

"BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."

"Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."

"The product costs more than 40K."

"The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."

"The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."

"We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."

"The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."

"Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

BizTalk Server has adapted to the changing needs of business over time with steady development, but there are new requirements, for example, on APIs, application programming interfaces. That functi...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM B2B Integrator?

IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM B2B Integrator?

It is not cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM B2B Integrator?

It supports many of our use cases but falls short in some areas as technology evolves, especially with data transfer between edge locations and the cloud or on-premise systems. The solution doesn’t...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 18% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 15% of the time

Camunda vs BizTalk Server

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 10% of the time

Infor ION vs BizTalk Server

Compared 5% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 39% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 35% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Process Orchestration vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM B2B Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

June 2025

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator

June 2025

Download IBM B2B Integrator product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

IBM

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. IBM B2B Integrator

June 2025

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. IBM B2B Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. IBM B2B Integrator and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. IBM B2B Integrator report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.