BizTalk Server vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator comparison

BizTalk Server and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator are both solutions in the Process Automation category. BizTalk Server is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.4, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0. BizTalk Server holds a 1.1% mindshare in PA, compared to Microsoft System Center Orchestrator’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of BizTalk Server users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 33% of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 16 BizTalk Server reviews

1,482 Views
771 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center Orc...

Read 2 Microsoft System Center Orchestrator reviews

1,115 Views
1,115 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

Microsoft System Center Orc...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BizTalk Server and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator compete in the enterprise integration and automation category. System Center Orchestrator seems to have the upper hand due to its superior automation capabilities and cost-effective setup, making it more suitable for optimizing IT processes.

Features: BizTalk Server offers enterprise-level integration capabilities with reliable message handling, robust adapters, and extensive protocol support. It enhances business processes through message transformation and routing. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator provides comprehensive IT process automation, enabling task automation and integration with Microsoft services. It allows for custom runbook creation, offering efficient workflow management. While BizTalk focuses on connectivity, Orchestrator prioritizes optimizing IT operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center Orchestrator provides a user-friendly deployment model with predefined runbook activities and strong community support. BizTalk Server requires more specialized expertise, focusing on enterprise integrations. Orchestrator often deploys faster, enhancing IT process efficiency, while BizTalk necessitates extensive setup for complex integrations.

Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server involves higher setup costs, generating significant ROI in complex integration environments. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator presents a cost-effective setup, delivering ROI through enhanced automation and reduced operational workload. BizTalk's costs are justified in sophisticated integration scenarios, whereas Orchestrator's lower costs and high efficiency favor IT process optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Process Automation

11th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (8th)

Microsoft System Center Orc...

Ranking in Process Automation

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BizTalk Server	1.1%
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator	1.3%
Other	97.6%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Taqi-Hasan

Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution

Offers valuable integration services but requires better cloud adaptation

Biztalk server doesn't have API management so that our exposed can be protected against the SQL injection, DOS attacks. However, this is available in IBM WebMethods. The positive impact of BizTalk Server was initially limited because of scalability issues. That is the reason why management has decided to implement IBM WebMethods. We are going to decommission BizTalk Server next year. I believe the API response could be improved in BizTalk Server. We need to increase the number of servers in BizTalk Server. We used to have two servers; later on, we increased to a third server, which has improved performance. We can make it more highly available and scale out to improve BizTalk Server. Scale out means we can increase the number of servers horizontally.

Read full review

Dan Campeanu

Security Engineer at ProVision

Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location

The initial setup was quite complex. It required careful preparation of installation steps, as many tasks were not automated as expected. Special attention was needed to prepare groups, users, and permissions at each step to ensure a smooth setup process. Please do so accurately to avoid having to start over. Challenges encountered during deployment included issues with installation and configuration and difficulties detecting machines and executing tasks as expected. Some solutions were found through trial and error during installation, while others were discovered through recommendations from other users. Despite these challenges, the deployment and rollout of Orchestrator took approximately one and a half months to ensure proper functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes."

"BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation."

"The most valuable feature is its reliability and stability. The first version of BizTalk was released in 2000, and many companies still use it. It was stable until 2013 when we had support."

"Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market."

"Compared to the current solutions I use, like Azure Logic Apps and other cloud services, BizTalk was far better and more reliable."

"We can handle a large number of messages without any issues, ensuring that everything runs smoothly."

"The BizTalk Server business rule engine was very useful for us and has helped us for the last 12 years."

"I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten."

More BizTalk Server pros

"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."

Cons

"The product's deployment can be quicker"

"It's an on-premises system, requiring physical servers for deployment. This is different from Azure; you don't need any servers with Azure. If you have a subscription, you can do whatever you want. There are unit restrictions based on the environment (like non-production vs. production) in BizTalk. You need physical servers and databases. In Azure, those are not required – it's all in the cloud."

"Updating things in BizTalk is a headache."

"The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities."

"It's a complex product because you have many degrees of freedom to connect different parts together. Whether it's sensible or not, is up to you, but the machine does allow it. But because of the vast degrees of freedom, it's complex."

"The deployment could be simplified."

"I didn't find anything particularly valuable in BizTalk Server. It didn't help me, and we are moving away from BizTalk Server to a new platform."

"BizTalk lacks native cloud support. BizTalk doesn't offer in-built support for cloud. We need to use third-party adapters to connect it to cloud services."

More BizTalk Server cons

"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."

"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was not cheap, but it was affordable."

"BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."

"Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."

"The cost will depend on the client's requirements."

"BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."

"The solution is expensive."

"I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten."

"We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

I am generally satisfied with BizTalk Server, but there are some gaps, as we have multiple integration tools. Thus, there is associated cost, operation cost, license cost, and CapEx, so we are tryi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

I have not worked with Amazon API Gateway or Mule ESB; I am just testing them. I am using Boomi iPaaS and WebMethods. I did not purchase it on AWS Marketplace; those are product API systems, and in...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

The platform was almost free of cost for us. We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

The product's management aspect needs enhancement. It affects the visibility of powerful scripts that were previously accessible. Furthermore, the focus is shifting towards cloud-based features, sp...

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 9% of the time

IBM BPM vs BizTalk Server

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 9% of the time

Infor ION vs BizTalk Server

Compared 5% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

Camunda vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 15% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 13% of the time

Rundeck vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 12% of the time

Ivanti Automation vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Operations Orchestration vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 9% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

February 2026

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

January 2026

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator report

Download Microsoft System Center Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

No data available

MS System Center Orchestrator

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

As an IT administrator, you probably perform a lot of tasks and procedures to keep your computing environment healthy. You may have automated individual tasks, but typically, not the whole process. With System Center - Orchestrator you tie disparate tasks and procedures together using a graphical user interface Runbook Designer to create reliable, flexible, and efficient end-to-end solutions in your IT environment.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

February 2026

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.