Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

Microsoft and ServiceNow are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0, while ServiceNow is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Microsoft holds a 1.3% mindshare in PA, compared to ServiceNow’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 33% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

Microsoft System Center Orc...

Read 2 Microsoft System Center Orchestrator reviews

1,058 Views
1,058 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

ServiceNow Orchestration

Read 16 ServiceNow Orchestration reviews

1,954 Views
1,915 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center Orc...

ServiceNow Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and ServiceNow Orchestration compete in the IT service automation category. ServiceNow Orchestration has the upper hand due to its extensive feature set despite higher costs.

Features: Microsoft System Center Orchestrator provides robust integration within Microsoft ecosystems, enabling efficient automation in Windows environments. It excels in cohesive task automation and workflow management. ServiceNow Orchestration, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform offering broad automation capabilities with extensive application integration, making it appealing for IT and business process automation. Its main advantage is the superior flexibility and wider range of features compared to SCO's integration strengths.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center Orchestrator may require a complex setup, especially in non-Microsoft environments, but is supported strongly for such deployments. ServiceNow Orchestration's cloud-based deployment simplifies implementation across various IT ecosystems, with excellent service ensuring smooth transitions and operations. The key difference lies in ServiceNow's ease of deployment and versatile support versus SCO's focus on existing infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center Orchestrator generally entails a lower initial setup cost, suited for cost-sensitive organizations due to its competitive pricing aligned with Microsoft licensing. ServiceNow Orchestration, with a higher setup cost, promises a more compelling ROI for businesses needing comprehensive automation tools to boost operational efficiencies. The distinction is between SCO's cost-effectiveness and ServiceNow's higher returns through extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft System Center Orc...

Ranking in Process Automation

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ServiceNow Orchestration

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Orchestration is 3.2%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ServiceNow Orchestration	3.2%
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator	1.3%
Other	95.5%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Dan Campeanu

Security Engineer at ProVision

Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location

The initial setup was quite complex. It required careful preparation of installation steps, as many tasks were not automated as expected. Special attention was needed to prepare groups, users, and permissions at each step to ensure a smooth setup process. Please do so accurately to avoid having to start over. Challenges encountered during deployment included issues with installation and configuration and difficulties detecting machines and executing tasks as expected. Some solutions were found through trial and error during installation, while others were discovered through recommendations from other users. Despite these challenges, the deployment and rollout of Orchestrator took approximately one and a half months to ensure proper functionality.

Read full review

Claude-Yameogo

Consultant at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has helped orchestrate processes and integrate workflows across cloud environments

I recommend ServiceNow Orchestration for larger companies because they have the capability to manage complex environments where it performs better. I promote low-code solutions for these implementations. I don't currently have an idea regarding the pre-built integrations of ServiceNow Orchestration, but I plan to check my area to determine what added value it can bring. I would rate this solution a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."

"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"Provisioning of new systems is among the most impactful features for automating complex workflows with ServiceNow Orchestration."

"I use it to orchestrate processes and integration features to gather and update data during specified timeframes or exchange data in real-time when changes occur based on certain criteria."

"The product has a flexible interface for development."

"The iTerm suite is also crucial for visibility and optimization."

"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time."

"I use it to orchestrate processes and integration features to gather and update data during specified timeframes or exchange data in real-time when changes occur based on certain criteria."

"The data visualization is good."

"The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in languages like Java. But along with that, there are limitation in terms of network connectivity testing and administrator faces regular challenges in conducting connectivity tests due to these limitations."

More ServiceNow Orchestration pros

Cons

"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."

"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."

"We cannot perform GUI automation using the tool."

"From my space, the only thing that I can say is the spinning up with Google Cloud Services."

"I would like a user experience module to be added."

"If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration."

"There can be gaps in integration."

"If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration."

More ServiceNow Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost."

"I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten."

"ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."

"It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."

"The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."

"This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."

"In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."

"It is not very expensive."

"Pricing is custom to every customer."

"The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

The platform was almost free of cost for us. We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

The product's management aspect needs enhancement. It affects the visibility of powerful scripts that were previously accessible. Furthermore, the focus is shifting towards cloud-based features, sp...

See all answers

What do you like most about ServiceNow Orchestration?

The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in l...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Orchestration?

The cost of ServiceNow Orchestration is considered medium; it is expensive but powerful. I would rate the pricing experience as a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ServiceNow Orchestration?

If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration. Boomi is an ESB with orchestration features to integrate and exchange dat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 14% of the time

Rundeck vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 12% of the time

vCenter Orchestrator vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 11% of the time

CA Process Automation vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 11% of the time

Ivanti Automation vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 11% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Competitors

Camunda vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 29% of the time

Control-M vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

Temporal vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

Ivanti Automation vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 3% of the time

More ServiceNow Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

December 2025

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator report

Download Microsoft System Center Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

ServiceNow Orchestration

January 2026

Download ServiceNow Orchestration product report

Also Known As

MS System Center Orchestrator

No data available

Overview

As an IT administrator, you probably perform a lot of tasks and procedures to keep your computing environment healthy. You may have automated individual tasks, but typically, not the whole process. With System Center - Orchestrator you tie disparate tasks and procedures together using a graphical user interface Runbook Designer to create reliable, flexible, and efficient end-to-end solutions in your IT environment.

Microsoft

ServiceNow is the fastest-growing enterprise cloud software company in the world above $1 billion (2018 revenue was $2.6 billion, up 36% year over year). We deliver digital workflows that create great experiences and unlock productivity to approximately 5,400 enterprise customers worldwide, including almost 75% of the Fortune 500.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

experian, BEACHBODY, HealthPartners, Banosoft

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.