IBM B2B Integrator vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

IBM and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAP is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.9. IBM holds a 6.7% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

IBM B2B Integrator

Read 47 IBM B2B Integrator reviews

1,459 Views
1,094 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 35 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,644 Views
1,005 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM B2B Integrator

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

IBM B2B Integrator and SAP Process Orchestration compete in the enterprise integration space, where each has distinct advantages. IBM stands out in external system integration, while SAP provides streamlined integration within SAP environments.

Features: IBM B2B Integrator provides extensive integration capabilities across various systems, strong data transformation for B2B transactions, and wide protocol support. SAP Process Orchestration delivers robust integration with SAP and non-SAP systems, useful connectors, and respected monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM B2B Integrator needs better out-of-the-box solutions, enhanced integration with IBM products, and improved monitoring and analytics. SAP Process Orchestration can enhance its business monitoring tools and manage high volumes more effectively. Transitioning to cloud solutions poses challenges and costs for SAP users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM B2B Integrator is typically on-premises with limited cloud support, and its technical support is responsive but sometimes requires escalation. SAP Process Orchestration offers diverse deployment options, including cloud, with reliable support despite the complexity of transitioning between solutions.

Pricing and ROI: IBM B2B Integrator is perceived as costly, with flexible pricing based on PVUs or cloud subscription, achieving varied ROI. SAP Process Orchestration is likewise expensive, with pricing dependent on package and scale, offering competitive pricing in SAP-centric settings. Both provide potential ROI, but timelines vary.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM B2B Integrator

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of IBM B2B Integrator is 6.7%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 5.4%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM B2B Integrator	6.7%
SAP Process Orchestration	5.4%
Other	87.9%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

reviewer2742345

General Manager Neverhack Spain at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Experience with robust integrator reveals strong performance and potential for interface updates

Based on my experience and my clients' feedback, there are a few points IBM can improve for IBM B2B Integrator. One of these is the graphical user interface. For several years, IBM has been promising to renew this interface, which has an ancient, old aesthetic, though it contains many functionalities. Creating a new interface would incur a very high internal cost with no new profitability for IBM. This is one of the points where customers say it feels like working in the 1990s with this interface. Another significant issue is that the platform is not multi-tenant. It's not possible to have different tenants in the cloud. This creates problems when trying to create SaaS offers based on IBM B2B Integrator, as there is the possibility that some workflow for a customer can be visible to another one. Since it's not multi-tenant, it's running on the same tenant of the platform. This is the main issue that the platform has.

Read full review

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders."

"B2B provides a secure communication channel."

"I find the codeless communications, SFTP or FTP, valuable."

"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."

"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."

"It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners."

"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."

"The solution is fast and easy to use."

More IBM B2B Integrator pros

"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"SAP Process Orchestration provides extensive integrations with external partners, supports B2B operations, and has prepackaged content that saves development time."

"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."

"The performance of data processing has increased."

"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."

"I think it is a very stable tool. My company did not have any problem with the tool."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"The initial setup is complex."

"There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry."

"The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with."

"From the automation perspective, IBM B2B Integrator has its own powerful workflow, but compared to other applications such as MuleSoft or Boomi, they have many cloud connectors and multiple connectors for integrating with Salesforce or other CRM or ERP applications, whereas here you may have to develop them, which is not native."

"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."

"They do not have a solid partner ecosystem, and they do not have a clear roadmap for down the line; they're missing that clear roadmap."

"There is no related transaction stored in the database because it's an OLTP application."

"Patching or upgrading the product is a bit of a nightmare. It would be nice if they removed the installation manager port. We find it complicates upgrading and patching a great deal."

More IBM B2B Integrator cons

"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."

"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."

"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

"SAP should improve the user interface, as it often lacks modern features and aesthetic appeal."

"There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost."

"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product costs more than 40K."

"Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."

"The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."

"The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."

"The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."

"We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"The solution is highly-priced."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM B2B Integrator?

Regarding pricing, IBM B2B Integrator rates in the middle range. This integrator has embedded all the functionality needed to handle files and messages. It tends to be very expensive because the IB...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM B2B Integrator?

From the automation perspective, IBM B2B Integrator has its own powerful workflow, but compared to other applications such as MuleSoft or Boomi, they have many cloud connectors and multiple connect...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM B2B Integrator?

IBM B2B Integrator is majorly used in banks for managed file transfer, integrating with their external and internal applications for large files, especially huge files which need to be transferred,...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The price for SAP Process Orchestration is a little high when compared to market trends, which is just how the business is. I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 16% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 15% of the time

Cleo Integration Cloud Platform vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM B2B Integrator Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Graph Data Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator

January 2026

Download IBM B2B Integrator product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

January 2026

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

IBM

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration

February 2026

Free Report: IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.