IBM B2B Integrator vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

IBM and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAP is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. IBM holds a 6.4% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

IBM B2B Integrator

Read 47 IBM B2B Integrator reviews

1,317 Views
961 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 35 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,555 Views
971 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM B2B Integrator

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

IBM B2B Integrator and SAP Process Orchestration compete in the enterprise integration space, where each has distinct advantages. IBM stands out in external system integration, while SAP provides streamlined integration within SAP environments.

Features: IBM B2B Integrator provides extensive integration capabilities across various systems, strong data transformation for B2B transactions, and wide protocol support. SAP Process Orchestration delivers robust integration with SAP and non-SAP systems, useful connectors, and respected monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM B2B Integrator needs better out-of-the-box solutions, enhanced integration with IBM products, and improved monitoring and analytics. SAP Process Orchestration can enhance its business monitoring tools and manage high volumes more effectively. Transitioning to cloud solutions poses challenges and costs for SAP users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM B2B Integrator is typically on-premises with limited cloud support, and its technical support is responsive but sometimes requires escalation. SAP Process Orchestration offers diverse deployment options, including cloud, with reliable support despite the complexity of transitioning between solutions.

Pricing and ROI: IBM B2B Integrator is perceived as costly, with flexible pricing based on PVUs or cloud subscription, achieving varied ROI. SAP Process Orchestration is likewise expensive, with pricing dependent on package and scale, offering competitive pricing in SAP-centric settings. Both provide potential ROI, but timelines vary.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM B2B Integrator

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of IBM B2B Integrator is 6.4%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 5.7%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM B2B Integrator	6.4%
SAP Process Orchestration	5.7%
Other	87.9%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

reviewer2742345

General Manager Neverhack Spain at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Experience with robust integrator reveals strong performance and potential for interface updates

Based on my experience and my clients' feedback, there are a few points IBM can improve for IBM B2B Integrator. One of these is the graphical user interface. For several years, IBM has been promising to renew this interface, which has an ancient, old aesthetic, though it contains many functionalities. Creating a new interface would incur a very high internal cost with no new profitability for IBM. This is one of the points where customers say it feels like working in the 1990s with this interface. Another significant issue is that the platform is not multi-tenant. It's not possible to have different tenants in the cloud. This creates problems when trying to create SaaS offers based on IBM B2B Integrator, as there is the possibility that some workflow for a customer can be visible to another one. Since it's not multi-tenant, it's running on the same tenant of the platform. This is the main issue that the platform has.

Read full review

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility."

"The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."

"Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders."

"The best feature is that many companies use the solution so there is a lot of peer support."

"IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution."

"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."

"It can scale horizontally as well as vertically as a cluster."

More IBM B2B Integrator pros

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."

"In my opinion, SAP PO is the most mature suite of tools to integrate processes across SAP environments at this moment. It's really unbeatable because it allows you to integrate whatever scenarios you can imagine."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."

"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."

"It is simple to transfer files."

"Orchestration is beneficial for us."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"The one thing that is lacking is easy visibility. It's hard to provide business users with a view into the statuses of their transactions."

"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."

"Patching or upgrading the product is a bit of a nightmare. It would be nice if they removed the installation manager port. We find it complicates upgrading and patching a great deal."

"IBM B2B Integrator could improve the business process itself, there is no resignation of duties and in terms of the console should be changed in a way that is more user-friendly."

"There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry."

"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly."

"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."

"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."

More IBM B2B Integrator cons

"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."

"The cloud capability features need improvement."

"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."

"The product costs more than 40K."

"The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."

"We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."

"The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."

"Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM B2B Integrator?

Regarding pricing, IBM B2B Integrator rates in the middle range. This integrator has embedded all the functionality needed to handle files and messages. It tends to be very expensive because the IB...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM B2B Integrator?

From the automation perspective, IBM B2B Integrator has its own powerful workflow, but compared to other applications such as MuleSoft or Boomi, they have many cloud connectors and multiple connect...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM B2B Integrator?

IBM B2B Integrator is majorly used in banks for managed file transfer, integrating with their external and internal applications for large files, especially huge files which need to be transferred,...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The price for SAP Process Orchestration is a little high when compared to market trends, which is just how the business is. I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 20% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 18% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 18% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM B2B Integrator Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator

January 2026

Download IBM B2B Integrator product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

January 2026

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

IBM

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration

December 2025

Free Report: IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM B2B Integrator vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.