BizTalk Server and webMethods.io are competing middleware solutions that facilitate integration across applications and services. Despite BizTalk Server having competitive pricing and support, webMethods.io often emerges as the favored choice for its advanced cloud-based features and versatility.
Features: BizTalk Server is recognized for its comprehensive message transformation and routing capabilities, making it suitable for complex enterprise environments. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products and legacy systems. webMethods.io offers a wide range of connectors, API management, and IoT integration capabilities, alongside a user-friendly workflow builder for easy process automation.
Room for Improvement: BizTalk Server could improve its cloud capabilities to compete better against modern integration solutions. Its lengthy deployment times could also be streamlined. webMethods.io might work on enhancing its cost-efficiency for smaller organizations and advance its on-premise compatibility to capture more market share.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BizTalk Server typically involves longer deployment processes due to its on-premise installations and requires significant IT resources. However, it offers substantial customer service support. On the other hand, webMethods.io provides quicker deployment owing to its cloud-native model, and its customer service is positively highlighted for accessibility and support.
Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server is often viewed as cost-effective initially, especially for Microsoft-centric organizations, but can incur higher long-term costs due to infrastructure and maintenance requirements. webMethods.io has a higher upfront cost but tends to provide a better ROI through reduced operational costs and increased productivity due to its cloud capabilities.
Now the direction is to move away from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods, which has more features compared to BizTalk Server.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
BizTalk Server's stability rates about eight or nine out of ten.
BizTalk Server is good for small companies but not for big companies.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages.
webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
The only thing I heard is that it's not inexpensive.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.