BizTalk Server vs webMethods.io comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.1, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 5.0% mindshare in BBM, compared to IBM’s 10.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 14 BizTalk Server reviews

587 Views
278 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

990 Views
624 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

BizTalk Server and webMethods.io are competing middleware solutions that facilitate integration across applications and services. Despite BizTalk Server having competitive pricing and support, webMethods.io often emerges as the favored choice for its advanced cloud-based features and versatility.

Features: BizTalk Server is recognized for its comprehensive message transformation and routing capabilities, making it suitable for complex enterprise environments. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products and legacy systems. webMethods.io offers a wide range of connectors, API management, and IoT integration capabilities, alongside a user-friendly workflow builder for easy process automation.

Room for Improvement: BizTalk Server could improve its cloud capabilities to compete better against modern integration solutions. Its lengthy deployment times could also be streamlined. webMethods.io might work on enhancing its cost-efficiency for smaller organizations and advance its on-premise compatibility to capture more market share.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BizTalk Server typically involves longer deployment processes due to its on-premise installations and requires significant IT resources. However, it offers substantial customer service support. On the other hand, webMethods.io provides quicker deployment owing to its cloud-native model, and its customer service is positively highlighted for accessibility and support.

Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server is often viewed as cost-effective initially, especially for Microsoft-centric organizations, but can incur higher long-term costs due to infrastructure and maintenance requirements. webMethods.io has a higher upfront cost but tends to provide a better ROI through reduced operational costs and increased productivity due to its cloud capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. webMethods.io

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (14th)

webMethods.io

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 5.0%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 10.6%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Vignesh Kumar Sekar

Senior Analyst at Sword Group

Enables message routing and provides a secure way to communicate between two systems

The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes. It enables a handshake with the source and target systems using certificates. It is the most secure way of communicating between two systems. It is an advantage. We can do a lot of message routing. If we want to handle large data, we can put the data into different patterns to process it. We can do it through sequential convoy or parallel convoy orchestration. BizTalk comes with SQL Server. We can load temporary data in the database and use the batch process from BizTalk. It is an added advantage. Creating agreements is a manual job, but it's quite easy in BizTalk. Even a fresh college graduate can configure AS2 certificates and partner profiles and communicate with other systems. It is easy.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is its reliability and stability. The first version of BizTalk was released in 2000, and many companies still use it. It was stable until 2013 when we had support."

"Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers."

"The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions."

"Compared to the current solutions I use, like Azure Logic Apps and other cloud services, BizTalk was far better and more reliable."

"We can handle a large number of messages without any issues, ensuring that everything runs smoothly."

"The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good."

More BizTalk Server pros

"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."

"The product is very stable."

"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."

"The stability is good."

"The product is powerful, straightforward, and easy to use."

"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."

"The cloud version of the solution is very easy to set up."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities."

"The product's deployment can be quicker"

"BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging."

"BizTalk is in the past, Microsoft is not going to evolve it any further or add any new features."

"BizTalk lacks native cloud support. BizTalk doesn't offer in-built support for cloud. We need to use third-party adapters to connect it to cloud services."

"The deployment could be simplified."

"It's a complex product because you have many degrees of freedom to connect different parts together. Whether it's sensible or not, is up to you, but the machine does allow it. But because of the vast degrees of freedom, it's complex."

"It's an on-premises system, requiring physical servers for deployment. This is different from Azure; you don't need any servers with Azure. If you have a subscription, you can do whatever you want. There are unit restrictions based on the environment (like non-production vs. production) in BizTalk. You need physical servers and databases. In Azure, those are not required – it's all in the cloud."

More BizTalk Server cons

"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."

"It could be more user-friendly."

"It is an expensive solution and not very suitable for smaller businesses."

"The licensing cost is high compared to other options."

"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."

"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost will depend on the client's requirements."

"The solution is expensive."

"BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."

"Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."

"BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."

"It was not cheap, but it was affordable."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

BizTalk Server has adapted to the changing needs of business over time with steady development, but there are new requirements, for example, on APIs, application programming interfaces. That functi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 18% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 15% of the time

Camunda vs BizTalk Server

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 10% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs BizTalk Server

Compared 6% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

June 2025

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

June 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. webMethods.io

June 2025

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.