No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BlackBerry Secure [EOL] vs Forescout Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Secure [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Forescout Platform
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (6th), IoT Security (5th), Endpoint Compliance (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (29th)
 

Featured Reviews

Consulta5fbd - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
It is flexible on the database and application side
The primary use case is for business Twice, I have seen a measurable decrease in the mean time to detect or respond to threats. Make the back-end installation simpler. I would like integration with other mobile solutions. It is stable, which is good. It is flexible on the database and…
AshishKumar Rai - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Comprehensive visibility has strengthened endpoint control and automated threat response across networks
When it comes to improving Forescout Platform, I have faced some issues recently, particularly with the switch integration part. When integrating a switch, it asks for the vendor type, and often it does not match. For example, one series of HP switches may not be found in that vendor list. This leads to frustration because you have to check again with different HP models, and once you integrate a switch, you cannot edit the vendor list without removing it. Other issues are being worked on, particularly related to switch integration. I believe they will be fixed in the next upgrade or patch fix. There are no major issues, but the configuration changes needed for the switch model are necessary, and I think it would help if during integration, an admin user could check the password or credential used, as they currently cannot see the password after it is entered and saved.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ROI is good because it supports the productivity of our employees and has helped increase staff productivity by two hours."
"It is flexible on the database and application side."
"We use it to prevent malicious activities on our network that potentially infiltrate it."
"The solution offers very good management; it allows for good detection of all the vendor products we have on-site."
"The solution's implementation and operation are very easy."
"The most valuable feature of Forescout Platform is that it has everything that Aruba has at significantly less cost."
"Primarily used to define which host to admit onto the network, by tying a policy to the MAC address."
"The most valuable feature of the Forescout Platform is the large capacity it can handle. Additionally, the interface of the platform is good."
"The most valuable feature for us is the real-time alerting of newly connected devices, whether they are approved or unapproved devices on our network."
"Forescout Platform's most valuable features are that it is very granular. We are able to cull out a lot of information about our particular device or endpoint. The configuration and the visibility are very seamless. Overall the solution is very easy to handle and it's very comprehensive."
 

Cons

"Make the back-end installation simpler. I would like integration with other mobile solutions."
"If you want to deploy a new solution to block, you can't do it by yourself."
"Detection and control of Dual-Homed devices needs to be improved, as the product sometimes gives false positives."
"Forescout needs to upgrade its development in the future."
"The security features can be improved because we use it for sensitive information, such as compliance."
"Forescout needs to improve its cloud management and remote connectivity."
"The ability to block external devices in Mac is lacking and needs to be added."
"I'd like to see improvements in the reporting aspect of Forescout Platform. While the dashboards are good, the reports are lacking and need enhancement, especially in terms of standardization and customization options. Apart from that, all the features and functionalities are working well without any issues."
"This solution is not that easy to scale but this depends on a company's needs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are $5000 USD."
"Forescout's pricing is noted for its attractiveness, with potential discounts depending on partnership levels."
"It is expensive because you have to pay for their CSM, the customer's access manager, and their professional services on top of that, and they charge you roughly $400 per hour, which is overhead."
"You can have a flexible license depending on your environment."
"The pricing structure should be enhanced."
"I would rate Forescout Platform's pricing as four out of five."
"Devices with multiple IP's count multiple times against your license count."
"The cost of licensing for this product is quite high, but this cost covers all the features of the solution so it is a single payment for the term that has been selected."
"It's about $160,000, but I'm not sure how long that is for or what it includes. Because we were a test base, we were provided with servers, but now, Forescout wants us to buy servers because those servers are now end-of-life or end-of-service. For our lifecycle management program, in order to get a refresh on those servers, we would have to buy servers or use our own network resources to house Forescout. Forescout takes up about 13 or 14 virtual CPUs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise45
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
Forescout is a very powerful NAC product that does not rely on port level configuration. It can detect and block unauthorized devices very quickly. But it has a lot of capabilities and really would...
What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
I would rate the Forescout Device and Visibility Control Platform at a six out of ten.
What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
I recommend doing a compression demo. If people use it, they will buy it. So they have to see the product in place. That's the main recommendation is to do a proof of concept. If they do, they will...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Forescout Platform, CounterACT for Endpoint Compliance, ForeScout CounterACT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SIRVA, Buddle Findlay, Catholic Church Insurance and Macquarie University
RWJ Barnabas HealthEnbridge EnergyToyota MotorsSt. Luke's University Health NetworkGlobal Credit Union
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Armis, Palo Alto Networks and others in IoT Security. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.