BlazeMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing comparison

Perforce and Dotcom-Monitor are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Dotcom-Monitor is ranked #20. Perforce holds a 11.4% mindshare in LTT, compared to Dotcom-Monitor’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Dotcom-Monitor users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,160 Views
118 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Read 3 Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reviews

144 Views
8 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

BlazeMeter and Dotcom-Monitor LoadView compete in stress testing solutions. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView might have an advantage with its advanced features appealing to tech buyers who need comprehensive testing.

Features: BlazeMeter integrates with various CI/CD tools and is recognized for scalability and complex load testing. It supports numerous scripting capabilities. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView offers real browser-based testing and step-by-step scripting, providing more flexibility. It simulates precise user interactions crucial for detailed user experience insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter, a cloud-based solution, supports rapid deployment and offers responsive customer service. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView also uses cloud deployment, focusing on customer-tailored support beneficial for specific enterprises. It provides more specialized support options.

Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter offers a straightforward pricing model with scalable plans, seen as cost-effective without budget strains. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView may require a higher initial investment with a feature-rich environment that could yield higher ROI for detailed testing needs. Financial merits depend on testing scope and budget.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (10th), API Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (6th)

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 11.4%, down from 16.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

reviewer1631949

Solutions Architect ICT at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up

It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based nature, which allows us to conduct tests without relying on local resources."

"Running from the cloud with load distribution, exhibiting load from different geo-regions. Generating the load from different cloud regions is the best feature."

"The most valuable aspect of BlazeMeter is its user-friendly nature, ability to conduct distributed load testing and comprehensive analysis and reporting features. It particularly excels in providing a clear and organized view of load test results."

"The stability is good."

"It supports any number of features and has a lot of tutorials."

"The extensibility that the tool offers across environments and teams is valuable."

"There is a repository of all the scripts that we have created. You can go back and compare tests to see what the tests looked like. If I want to go and compare something with whatever happened six months or one year back, I can do that."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that BlazeMeter provides easy access to its users while also ensuring that its reporting functionalities are good."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The pricing is reasonable."

Cons

"Sometimes, when we execute tests, the results calculated by BlazeMeter, specifically the response times for failed transactions, are incorrect."

"The only downside of BlazeMeter is that it is a bit expensive."

"My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it."

"If the solution had better support and the documentation was efficient it would do better in the market."

"The product could improve in areas such as mobile testing and the integration of AI analytics."

"From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

"Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run."

More BlazeMeter cons

"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an averagely priced product."

"The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"The solution is free and open source."

"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 100% of the time

More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

June 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

June 2025

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report

Download Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

LoadView Stress Testing

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

LoadView provides scalable external load testing using real browsers. Spin up virtual machines in the Amazon, Google or Rackspace clouds without having to manage cloud accounts. Record scripts and run stress tests on demand. Learn more at https://www.loadview-testing.com

Dotcom-Monitor

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

June 2025

Free Report: BlazeMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlazeMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.