

BlazeMeter and OpenText Functional Testing compete in the software testing market, focusing on load and functional testing, respectively. BlazeMeter seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and cloud-based features, making it particularly effective in agile environments.
Features: BlazeMeter offers robust scalability for load testing with easy JMeter script integration, allowing load generation across multiple cloud regions. It supports cross-tool integration and handles complex scenarios seamlessly. OpenText Functional Testing provides a development-friendly environment with integration into IDEs, supports complex scripts across platforms, and features robust object recognition.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could enhance resource provisioning accuracy and server hour calculations and streamline test scheduling. Users noted a need for better APM tool integration and report customization. OpenText Functional Testing could improve support for modern browser ecosystems, script execution flexibility, and intuitive setup processes, with pricing as a concern.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter offers flexible deployment with public cloud solutions integrating well into agile frameworks, praised for supportive customer service and rapid issue resolution. OpenText provides on-premises and public cloud options, with satisfactory technical support but noted delays in integration with newer frameworks.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter's pricing structure is often more flexible and competitive, valuing its consumption-based model and transparent cost management. Users report better ROI due to reduced infrastructure costs and improved testing capabilities. OpenText Functional Testing is seen as costly, particularly for licensing fees compared to open-source alternatives.
BlazeMeter has positively affected my ROI, significantly saving time, resources, and money.
Customer support for BlazeMeter is commendable, offering 24/7 assistance.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
BlazeMeter is incredibly stable and delivers accurate results consistently.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
If BlazeMeter could automate integration across multiple pipelines and fetch the latest builds automatically, it would significantly enhance my experience.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
Regarding pricing, it is favorable compared to other tools, providing good value.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
Unlike JMeter, which has limitations on user simulations, BlazeMeter allows me to test any number of users, helping my e-commerce website manage unpredictable traffic loads effectively while delivering accurate results I can trust to improve my systems.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| BlazeMeter | 1.2% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| Other | 95.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.