

Pega Robotic Process Automation and Blue Prism are contenders in the automation software market, striving to improve process efficiency. Pega has an advantage with its user-friendly integration and dynamic UI capabilities, making it especially suitable for sectors like banking. Blue Prism stands out with strong security and ease of integration with new technologies.
Features: Pega Robotic Process Automation offers external DLL integration, centralized monitoring, and an effective UI creation feature, enhancing its application in banking. The development style is unique and seamlessly integrates with CRM tools. Blue Prism is recognized for stability, object sharing, and robust exception handling. It features a secure environment and consistently facilitates the integration of new technologies.
Room for Improvement: Pega could improve its OCR capabilities, simplify platform setup, and enhance cloud presence. Integration with Citrix and reducing Visual Studio .net dependencies are also needed. Blue Prism needs better AI and ML integration, enhanced attended automation features, and more flexibility in pricing models. Its user interface and exception handling for attended robots require improvements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pega supports deployment in private and hybrid clouds, with global round-the-clock technical support, although initial deployment can be challenging. Blue Prism supports on-premises and public cloud deployment and provides detailed documentation, though access could be more user-friendly. Both solutions offer reliable customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Pega Robotics tends to be costly, targeting large enterprises but offers favorable ROI with flexible pricing compared to competitors like UiPath and Automation Anywhere. Blue Prism is generally more expensive with straightforward licensing and usage-based costs, increasing significantly with additional bots. Both products demonstrate consistent ROI, with Pega potentially offering more cost-effectiveness in certain deployments.
We paid back within less than six months, and our cost for Blue Prism hasn't changed for the last 10 years.
I have seen that it is taking almost more than one or two years to see a return on investment.
Regarding ROI from Blue Prism, it is evaluated from a business perspective, with break-even timelines generally around six to nine months for large implementations, depending on client size and scale.
If we need to learn something about fixing a problem, improving a solution structure, they have something called knowledge management hours, where we can tap into their expertise to improve our processes or find different ways to build our solutions.
I would rate the technical support by Blue Prism as ten out of ten because we have dedicated support for Blue Prism.
My experience with Blue Prism's technical support has been largely positive, with them being very responsive when needed, especially during the early stages of tool evolution.
On-premise support is generally not as effective as the cloud support that Pega currently provides.
The speed and quality of response could be improved.
The digital workforce of Blue Prism has pioneered capabilities for scaling digital workforce members based on varied requirements, such as during the tax season when more digital robots are needed in the tax department, showcasing its scaling ability effectively.
There are limitations in scaling as RPA is not a scalable solution.
On a scale from one to ten, stability would rate at three.
If we increase or improve the efficiency of archiving while running the production environment with a huge database size, that would be much more helpful for managing the state and the performance.
Only each bot level logs are possible, which will not help when maintaining one hundred plus or two hundred plus bots.
I would like to see the interface of Blue Prism refreshed.
Pega Robotic Process Automation is a temporary solution to a bigger issue, and the cost of implementation especially with Pega really stops customers from proceeding.
They don't charge per user or per environment, so you get everything you need included at one fixed cost.
While the licensing cost is something I haven't checked in a while, I find that although it initially seems costlier than competitors, Blue Prism's licensing model is simpler and proves to be cost-effective over time.
The price of Blue Prism is costly, but I believe the quality should increase.
From a developer perspective, I find developing on Blue Prism simple, clean, and intuitive, making maintenance considerably easier compared to other tools.
Blue Prism's compliance with high-security standards has helped my organization greatly.
The ability to scale quickly is also valuable, and their support is good in general.
The number of human steps that have been eliminated is significant, and we try to maximize straight-through processing.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Blue Prism | 4.4% |
| Pega Robotic Process Automation | 2.1% |
| Other | 93.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 75 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Blue Prism offers advanced automation features with integration capabilities and robust exception handling. Its scalability and reliability make it ideal for automating complex and repetitive tasks across industries like banking and manufacturing.
Providing a user-friendly design studio, Blue Prism stands out with enhanced automation features such as unassisted bots, strong security measures, and Visual Basic Objects. Its integration capabilities with analytics tools like Tableau and a simplified licensing model contribute to its appeal. Despite its complexities in UI design and training resource limitations, it remains stable and reliable. Blue Prism addresses tasks such as invoice processing and data entry, but improvements in AI, cognitive capabilities, and customer support are needed. Enhancements in OCR technology, unstructured data handling, and web-based interfaces could significantly boost its accessibility.
What are Blue Prism's most important features?Organizations in industries like finance and manufacturing harness Blue Prism to automate repetitive tasks, boosting efficiency in back-end operations. In banking and insurance, it's used for auditing, compliance, and report generation, enhancing accuracy and reducing manual efforts.
Pega Robotic Process Automation offers advanced UI capabilities, seamless CRM integration, and a centralized management system, enhancing efficiency with low-code options and cross-platform integration. Its centralized dashboards, scalability, and technical support provide strong foundations for diverse applications.
Pega Robotic Process Automation empowers businesses with its robust workflow systems, allowing seamless integration with CRM platforms and enhancing user experience through low-code/no-code development options. The platform's ability to automate data entry and create rapid adapters boosts functionality, ensuring enterprises can meet diverse demands efficiently. Highly valued for its centralized management and stability, Pega also provides insights into agent performance through Workforce Intelligence. It caters to both attended and unattended bots, significantly eliminating manual steps. Despite its advantages, there is room for improved OCR accuracy, user interface enhancement, cloud service expansion in regions like the Middle East and India, and simplified development tools. Addressing these could help keep pace with industry standards.
What are the key features of Pega Robotic Process Automation?Pega Robotic Process Automation finds applications across telecom, banking, insurance, and aviation sectors for operations like fraud detection, compliance checks, and task management. It boosts efficiency in activities such as dual data entry, customer data integration, and process mining. Its adaptability allows for HR and financial workflow automation, integration with mainframe systems, and development of mobile applications.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.