BMC AMI DevX vs Perforce Delphix comparison

BMC and Perforce are both solutions in the Test Data Management category. BMC is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while Perforce is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. BMC holds a 10.7% mindshare in TDM, compared to Perforce’s 21.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 19 BMC AMI DevX reviews

4,709 Views
424 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Perforce Delphix

Read 19 Perforce Delphix reviews

3,473 Views
1,424 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Perforce Delphix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Perforce Delphix and BMC AMI DevX compete in data management and mainframe development sectors. Delphix excels in data management capabilities, while BMC leads in mainframe development tools.

Features: Delphix offers virtualization, VDB provisioning, and advanced data masking, providing significant storage efficiency and rapid data access. Its support for diverse data sources enhances flexibility in managing sensitive data. BMC AMI DevX excels with robust debugging capabilities, comprehensive code management, and seamless integration features valuable for mainframe developers.

Room for Improvement: Delphix needs enhanced cross-platform capabilities, better reporting, and a refined user interface for improved usability. Expanding integration with CI/CD pipelines would benefit users. BMC AMI DevX could improve ease of use, supporting Eclipse integration and better installation documentation, addressing user adoption issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Delphix provides flexible deployment options, supporting hybrid cloud and on-premises environments, and is highly praised for its proactive and effective customer support. BMC operates primarily on-premises with limited cloud integrations. Both offer responsive technical support, though Delphix is slightly preferred for comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Delphix generally has higher upfront costs but offers significant storage savings and efficiency gains for a strong ROI if effectively deployed. BMC AMI DevX provides competitive and varied pricing models like seat-based licensing. Both solutions offer substantial cost savings, with users noting Delphix's storage ROI and BMC's licensing benefits in enterprise agreements.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Test Data Management

6th

Ranking in Data Masking

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (7th), Database Development and Management (18th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st)

Perforce Delphix

Ranking in Test Data Management

1st

Ranking in Data Masking

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Copy Data Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Data Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 10.7%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce Delphix is 21.1%, down from 29.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Data Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Perforce Delphix	21.1%
BMC AMI DevX	10.7%
Other	68.2%

Test Data Management

Featured Reviews

RobertSamson

Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS

Improves disaster recovery processes and offers an efficient CPU cycle optimization

Using BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS has greatly improved our database administration tasks. Although we don't test the database before production, we have experienced benefits in disaster recovery situations and capacity management. For instance, when facing capacity issues during peak transaction times, I've been able to quickly allocate additional resources to ensure smooth operations. This has been crucial, especially during times when the demand surges, such as peak flight hours.

Read full review

Priyanshu k

Release Train Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees

Automated data masking and provisioning has improved compliance and accelerated secure testing workflows across cloud environments

Some of the best features of Perforce Delphix include its automation of sensitive data discovery and masking with referential integrity for Aurora and RDS, as well as support for diverse data sources including Oracle, SQL, SQL Server, MySQL, and PostgreSQL. Additionally, its GUI workflows simplify the creation and scheduling of masking jobs and enhance data governance in cloud hybrid and on-premises environments. Perforce Delphix can deliver up to 25 terabytes of data in just minutes, making it approximately 100 times faster for development and testing needs. Perforce Delphix has positively impacted my organization by saving us 70 to 80% of the time, which has enabled us to complete data sprints earlier, and it has also helped reduce costs. The time to complete one story point has decreased from 10 hours to around 4 or 5 hours, leading to substantial cost savings. Furthermore, it's effective in managing scaled agile enterprise data management, as we orchestrate and govern masking jobs across multiple teams and agile release trains to ensure data privacy standards are maintained.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."

"The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change."

"We had parallel development before, but the way ISPW implements it is better. It has more control and oversight of the process, whereas before, it was like the Wild West. Everybody could have their own package with their own version of the component in it... ISPW is constantly aware of it. It notifies when someone else is using or has a different version of that component."

"I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout."

"I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information."

"Test data management capabilities are good."

"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."

"The smart editor helps because it will code-complete for me. I can see code working a lot faster and I'm able to get things coded in less time."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"Perforce Delphix has positively impacted my organization by saving us 70 to 80% of the time, which has enabled us to complete data sprints earlier, and it has also helped reduce costs."

"The most valuable aspect is the product is easy to manage, with a good dashboard. We can easily configure it on the front end and back end."

"The most valuable feature is VDB provisioning."

"It provides the ability to roll back to a point in time or roll forward without the assistance of a DBA."

"Perforce Delphix has positively impacted my organization by saving us 70 to 80% of the time, which has enabled us to complete data sprints earlier, and it has also helped reduce costs."

"The most valuable feature is creating virtual databases."

"It's really easy to install."

"Data being available anytime is a life changer."

More Perforce Delphix pros

Cons

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

"There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables."

"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"The ability to edit source code that has special characters is limited. The ability to incorporate or convert REXX into macros that are usable under the Topaz software is not there. And the REXX macros that I have developed over 40 years of work are useless, so I have a toolbox I can't use or deploy using the Topaz technology, while I can use it under MVS."

"It often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"It's a very complicated tool."

"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing. I know they have some out there that we are not licensed for at this time, but it seems like some of the Eclipse tools that are used for other programming languages, they're all just built-in and they're a little more intuitive to the developers. Making those testing tools as intuitive as possible, and as integrated as possible into the workbench, would be really beneficial."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"The solution’s self-service portal must be more interactive and user-friendly."

"When it comes to unstructured and structured data, if Delphix can comply with the requirements for most of the structured data, it would be good, especially if it can include the data scanning part."

"It would be good if any CI/CD and DevOps-aligned feature could be triggered through the DevOps pipeline."

"It is hard to answer whether I would advise someone to use Perforce because the market has moved far ahead of Perforce."

"The solution's price needs improvement."

"The initial implementation learning curve could be improved, as it is challenging for newcomers to navigate."

"Delphix could be improved with better usability and an agentless option."

"One area where Perforce Delphix could be improved is the ability to handle thousands of files more efficiently."

More Perforce Delphix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"The price point is great."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Delphix's pricing is affordable."

"I rate the product price seven to eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is the low price, and ten is the high price."

"The solution's pricing was reasonable and lower than one million."

"I would say the price is a little high but affordable for our needs."

"The cost is $370K annually for the Delphix Masking Engine and Delphix Virtualization Engine."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Insurance Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Compuware File-AID?

The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Compuware File-AID?

We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Compuware File-AID?

We use the solution clone test files.

See all answers

What do you like most about Delphix?

The performance offered by the product, its price, and its ability to handle structured and unstructured data were good when compared to the other products in the market.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Delphix?

It is hard for me to remember the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Perforce. I think the licensing was based on user count. I felt the pricing was a little higher at that time, which is what I...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Delphix?

The initial implementation learning curve could be improved, as it is challenging for newcomers to navigate.

See all answers

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 16% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 9% of the time

InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

Accelario TDM vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 11% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 6% of the time

Privacy Analytics Eclipse vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 3% of the time

More Perforce Delphix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

February 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Perforce Delphix

January 2026

Download Perforce Delphix product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

No data available

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

Perforce Delphix automates compliant data management for DevOps, providing data masking and virtualization to quickly integrate data into diverse cloud environments, balancing innovation speed with quality and compliance.

Businesses leveraging Perforce Delphix efficiently automate test data management and CI/CD processes while maintaining data privacy and security. This platform offers integrated data masking and virtualization, enabling rapid deployment of compliant data in non-production environments. Users benefit from its capacity to deliver secure data for various applications, swiftly recover from disruptions, and manage data in large-scale settings, enhancing development scenarios with synthetic and live data operations. Its flexible system reduces storage demands and facilitates environment rewinds through snapshots.

What are the key features?

Virtualization and Snapshot Capabilities: Enable time-point rollbacks and efficient VDB provisioning.
Data Masking: Enhances data privacy through robust masking functions.
Efficient Cloning: Simplifies data management with quick database creation and distribution.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates ease of data handling and management.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Storage Efficiency: Reduces storage needs and streamlines data accessibility.
Rapid Deployment: Accelerates compliant data integration and management.
Business Continuity: Supports swift recovery from data disruptions, ensuring operational stability.
Data Security: Prioritizes privacy with comprehensive masking and secure data operations.

In industries requiring quick data access and management, Perforce Delphix is instrumental in developing test data scenarios. Companies use its powerful data integration and compliance capabilities to manage extensive data environments efficiently, supporting modern database operations with reliable data virtualization, automated masking, and continuous updates to keep pace with dynamic project demands.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

Alberta Blue Cross, Fastweb, SABMiller, California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), Molina Healthcare, AT&T, Nike, Facebook, eBay, Comcast, IBM, HP, Intel, Avaya, BNP Paribas, P&B, Toyota, Walmart, Best Western, Directv, JPMorganChase, Verizon, Bank of the West, Fannie Mae

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix

January 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix report.

See our list of best Test Data Management vendors and best Data Masking vendors.

We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.