BMC AMI DevX vs InterTest comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Testing Tools category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Broadcom is ranked #2. BMC holds a 20.0% mindshare in MTT, compared to Broadcom’s 11.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 23 BMC AMI DevX reviews

7,985 Views
1,198 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

InterTest

Read 2 InterTest reviews

569 Views
552 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

InterTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

BMC AMI DevX and InterTest are competing products offering solutions for mainframe development and testing. InterTest holds an advantage in usability and comprehensive testing capabilities, whereas BMC AMI DevX is preferred for integration and support features.

Features: BMC AMI DevX includes robust debugging, automation capabilities, and seamless integration with DevOps tools. InterTest offers superior testing environments, extensive automation features, and rich testing capabilities, providing an advantage over BMC AMI DevX.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX provides straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support. InterTest, while effective, has a more complex deployment process, and BMC AMI DevX's service availability stands out in comparison.

Pricing and ROI: BMC AMI DevX tends to have a slightly higher setup cost but offers a strong ROI due to versatile features and support. InterTest presents a competitive pricing structure, delivering a strong ROI primarily through its testing capabilities despite higher ongoing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Mainframe Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (2nd), Database Development and Management (11th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (4th), Data Masking (3rd), AI Software Development (30th)

InterTest

Ranking in Mainframe Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Mainframe Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 20.0%, down from 30.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InterTest is 11.8%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	20.0%
InterTest	11.8%
Other	68.2%

Mainframe Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Wisdom Mbiza

Product Engineer at Absa Group

Modern tools have boosted mainframe file extraction speed and simplified everyday workflows

I definitely think BMC AMI DevX could be improved or enhanced in terms of the logging in features. BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Whenever you try to log in, it always prompts you for passwords. Then when you have to switch sessions, because we usually have to switch between production and UAT, there's no quick way of switching between the two. Every time you try to switch, it prompts you to log in. Additionally, there's a pop-up that I always receive. When you click X on it, it doesn't disappear. Eventually, I just end up minimizing it. Furthermore, the startup of BMC AMI DevX takes a long time to start up before it loads. It doesn't just immediately start up and it's ready. It takes a good solid two to three minutes before it's ready so that you can work on it. BMC AMI DevX's logins and the other ones I can understand because security has to be there, but I do feel that once I've logged in, I shouldn't need to log in again. The startup problem is the annoying one because if I want to do something, I need to open it two or three minutes earlier to give it time to load up. The startup problem is the one that definitely needs to be addressed.

Read full review

it_user860787

Senior Systems Programmer at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

Helps programmers verify changes, identify any kind of logic mistakes, more quickly

The line by line debugger of program logic for COBOL programs. It allows you to do as much testing as you're required to do, to pretty much guarantee that when a program goes into production it's as error-free as possible. None of them are completely ever free, but as error free as possible.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Topaz workbench is one of the most integrated into Eclipse that I've seen from the mainframe vendors."

"I think BMC AMI DevX has provided overall benefits and a positive impact because I've seen a lot of developers, not just the new developers, but even the old developers who have used the green screen their entire life, also developing with BMC AMI DevX and migrating into the newer screen."

"Once we got the configurations and deployment rolled out, it was very stable. I haven't had any major issues with Eclipse or the Topaz Workbench plugins."

"We can develop in parallel today on ISPF, but it's giving us the advantage of the newer interface into the mainframe programming languages that younger programmers can use and are familiar with, rather than using the ISPF green screen."

"I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information."

"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."

"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"

"BMC AMI DevX helps me develop COBOL while juggling other responsibilities by bringing editing, debugging, job submissions, and code navigation into a single environment."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"InterTest is also bundled with SymDump. We see this as a bundle. They are always together for us. So InterTest is used for debugging process, walking through the code, checking data conditions and code flow. SymDump is used for the fact, after a problem occurs. SymDump catches what point in time the problem occurred, all the other connecting data, and points us to the code to indicate what caused the situation."

"CA has done a fantastic job with this product, all the time."

"The line by line debugger of program logic for COBOL programs allows you to do as much testing as you're required to do, to pretty much guarantee that when a program goes into production it's as error-free as possible."

"Programmers can verify their changes more quickly, identify any kind of logic mistakes in the program more quickly."

Cons

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."

"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing."

"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."

"Their technical support could be better. There were times where, when we reported bugs, they would fix one bug but add another one. That's probably because of their support model. A lot of organizations are developing software using Agile rather than the Waterfall method, so things are happening all over the place. You get things quicker, but sometimes one fix will break another one or add other bugs."

"I find it more cumbersome to use Topaz."

"One thing I would really like to see some improvement on is the promotion diagnostic messages. It invokes utilities "under the covers" to copy components, and it does not echo back any of the error messages from those utilities."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"You can have as many users as you like using it. However, sometimes they'll "step on each other" if there are two applications that are testing in one particular region, one could cause some type of a storage overlay and that will hamper another customer trying to do something in the same region."

"Still, it's not a quick and easy product. You have to follow several steps to get through the installation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price point is great."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Insurance Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

25%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

I don't directly deal with the pricing side of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?

I work on mainframe, and some of the developers prefer to code on BMC AMI DevX because it looks more modern. For me, my basic use of it is just to extract information. Most of the time we end up ha...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Gen vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

IBM Debug for z/OS vs InterTest

Compared 16% of the time

BMC AMI DevX Performance Test vs InterTest

Compared 15% of the time

File Master Plus vs InterTest

Compared 13% of the time

IBM File Manager vs InterTest

Compared 11% of the time

SymDump vs InterTest

Compared 7% of the time

More InterTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

August 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

June 2026

Download InterTest product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA InterTest, CA InterTest for CICS, CA InterTest for Batch

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

InterTest offers a dynamic mainframe testing solution, ensuring efficient and reliable software quality assurance for essential corporate systems.

InterTest is tailored for mainframe environments, providing robust capabilities that streamline the software testing process. It reduces time spent on debugging and increases productivity through its automated batch and interactive testing features. Designed for knowledgeable professionals, it enhances system performance by catching errors earlier and more efficiently. The solution integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, making it an invaluable asset for maintaining high code quality.

What are the standout features of InterTest?

Automated Testing: Streamlines processes, reducing manual intervention.
Debugging Tools: Identifies and resolves errors promptly.
Batch Testing: Ensures comprehensive evaluation of large data sets.
Interactive Testing: Enhances user engagement with real-time testing capabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time and costs.
Error Reduction: Minimizes the risk of system failures through early detection.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrates effortlessly with existing systems to simplify processes.
Increased Productivity: Allows teams to focus on innovation rather than troubleshooting.

In industries reliant on mainframes, such as finance and healthcare, InterTest is critical in safeguarding data integrity and operational continuity. Its advanced testing capabilities ensure systems remain robust and secure, even as demands evolve. Implementation is smooth, with consistent performance improvements noted across different sectors by deploying this tool.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

Blue Hill Data Services

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

June 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest report.

See our list of best Mainframe Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.