BMC AMI DevX vs InterTest comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Testing Tools category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #2. BMC holds a 21.1% mindshare in MTT, compared to Broadcom’s 11.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 21 BMC AMI DevX reviews

6,965 Views
1,184 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

InterTest

Read 2 InterTest reviews

523 Views
513 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

InterTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

BMC AMI DevX and InterTest are competing products offering solutions for mainframe development and testing. InterTest holds an advantage in usability and comprehensive testing capabilities, whereas BMC AMI DevX is preferred for integration and support features.

Features: BMC AMI DevX includes robust debugging, automation capabilities, and seamless integration with DevOps tools. InterTest offers superior testing environments, extensive automation features, and rich testing capabilities, providing an advantage over BMC AMI DevX.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX provides straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support. InterTest, while effective, has a more complex deployment process, and BMC AMI DevX's service availability stands out in comparison.

Pricing and ROI: BMC AMI DevX tends to have a slightly higher setup cost but offers a strong ROI due to versatile features and support. InterTest presents a competitive pricing structure, delivering a strong ROI primarily through its testing capabilities despite higher ongoing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Mainframe Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (4th), Database Development and Management (16th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (5th), Data Masking (4th), AI Software Development (202nd)

InterTest

Ranking in Mainframe Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Mainframe Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 21.1%, down from 31.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InterTest is 11.7%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	21.1%
InterTest	11.7%
Other	67.2%

Mainframe Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Abulfazal Irfan

Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Tight deployment controls have secured production and simplified complex release rollbacks

The best feature of BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline that impresses me is the fallback functionality. The fallback functionality impresses me because when developers deploy large releases involving multiple components, such as COBOL programs, underlying copy books, and CICS modules, backing out changes would typically become a nightmare. With ISPW, developers can back out the entire release or entire package. If they deployed 100 components and want to back out everything, they can do so with one function and back out all components without worrying about backing out each individual component. They can back out the entire deployment set, which handles everything and brings them back to the previous versions. Developers can also selectively back out a subset of the deployed components. They also have the ability to revert to not just the most previous version but can go back several versions if they choose to do so. This gives them a lot of flexibility.

Read full review

it_user860787

Senior Systems Programmer at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

Helps programmers verify changes, identify any kind of logic mistakes, more quickly

The line by line debugger of program logic for COBOL programs. It allows you to do as much testing as you're required to do, to pretty much guarantee that when a program goes into production it's as error-free as possible. None of them are completely ever free, but as error free as possible.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing."

"I like that Compuware File-AID can actually map out control sections within load modules, or, as they're now known, program objects."

"It does our CICS NEWCOPYs and our Db2 binds for us, whereas before, that was a manual process. It takes a lot of the workload off of the operations folks and off the DBAs."

"With the use of ISPW, we were able to reduce our deployment time for specific applications by utilizing the auto-deploy features."

"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."

"My guess is this would have taken twice as long, or we would have had many more issues without using Xpediter."

"The debugging is really the most important feature, enabling us to be able to step through."

"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"Programmers can verify their changes more quickly, identify any kind of logic mistakes in the program more quickly."

"The line by line debugger of program logic for COBOL programs allows you to do as much testing as you're required to do, to pretty much guarantee that when a program goes into production it's as error-free as possible."

"CA has done a fantastic job with this product, all the time."

"InterTest is also bundled with SymDump. We see this as a bundle. They are always together for us. So InterTest is used for debugging process, walking through the code, checking data conditions and code flow. SymDump is used for the fact, after a problem occurs. SymDump catches what point in time the problem occurred, all the other connecting data, and points us to the code to indicate what caused the situation."

Cons

"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

"One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution."

"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."

"Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often."

"There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables."

"The ability to edit source code that has special characters is limited. The ability to incorporate or convert REXX into macros that are usable under the Topaz software is not there. And the REXX macros that I have developed over 40 years of work are useless, so I have a toolbox I can't use or deploy using the Topaz technology, while I can use it under MVS."

"Their technical support could be better."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"You can have as many users as you like using it. However, sometimes they'll "step on each other" if there are two applications that are testing in one particular region, one could cause some type of a storage overlay and that will hamper another customer trying to do something in the same region."

"Still, it's not a quick and easy product. You have to follow several steps to get through the installation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"The price point is great."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Insurance Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

I don't directly deal with the pricing side of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?

To improve BMC AMI DevX, consideration should be given to cloud-style provisioning and development models, as well as integration of more AI capabilities. Enhancements in VS Code extensions to deve...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?

BMC AMI DevX solutions are primarily used for mainframe-based resources and application development, encompassing not only COBOL but also Workbench and VS Code for various purposes. Data management...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 7% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Rocket Enterprise Developer (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

IBM Debug for z/OS vs InterTest

Compared 16% of the time

BMC AMI DevX Performance Test vs InterTest

Compared 14% of the time

IBM File Manager vs InterTest

Compared 12% of the time

File Master Plus vs InterTest

Compared 12% of the time

SymDump vs InterTest

Compared 8% of the time

More InterTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

June 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

June 2026

Download InterTest product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA InterTest, CA InterTest for CICS, CA InterTest for Batch

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

InterTest offers a dynamic mainframe testing solution, ensuring efficient and reliable software quality assurance for essential corporate systems.

InterTest is tailored for mainframe environments, providing robust capabilities that streamline the software testing process. It reduces time spent on debugging and increases productivity through its automated batch and interactive testing features. Designed for knowledgeable professionals, it enhances system performance by catching errors earlier and more efficiently. The solution integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, making it an invaluable asset for maintaining high code quality.

What are the standout features of InterTest?

Automated Testing: Streamlines processes, reducing manual intervention.
Debugging Tools: Identifies and resolves errors promptly.
Batch Testing: Ensures comprehensive evaluation of large data sets.
Interactive Testing: Enhances user engagement with real-time testing capabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time and costs.
Error Reduction: Minimizes the risk of system failures through early detection.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrates effortlessly with existing systems to simplify processes.
Increased Productivity: Allows teams to focus on innovation rather than troubleshooting.

In industries reliant on mainframes, such as finance and healthcare, InterTest is critical in safeguarding data integrity and operational continuity. Its advanced testing capabilities ensure systems remain robust and secure, even as demands evolve. Implementation is smooth, with consistent performance improvements noted across different sectors by deploying this tool.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

Blue Hill Data Services

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

June 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest report.

See our list of best Mainframe Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.