BMC AMI DevX vs InterTest comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Testing Tools category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #2. BMC holds a 22.1% mindshare in MTT, compared to Broadcom’s 12.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 20 BMC AMI DevX reviews

6,230 Views
1,246 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

InterTest

Read 2 InterTest reviews

509 Views
499 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

InterTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

BMC AMI DevX and InterTest are competing products offering solutions for mainframe development and testing. InterTest holds an advantage in usability and comprehensive testing capabilities, whereas BMC AMI DevX is preferred for integration and support features.

Features: BMC AMI DevX includes robust debugging, automation capabilities, and seamless integration with DevOps tools. InterTest offers superior testing environments, extensive automation features, and rich testing capabilities, providing an advantage over BMC AMI DevX.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX provides straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support. InterTest, while effective, has a more complex deployment process, and BMC AMI DevX's service availability stands out in comparison.

Pricing and ROI: BMC AMI DevX tends to have a slightly higher setup cost but offers a strong ROI due to versatile features and support. InterTest presents a competitive pricing structure, delivering a strong ROI primarily through its testing capabilities despite higher ongoing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Mainframe Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (6th), Database Development and Management (16th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (5th), Data Masking (4th), AI Software Development (217th)

InterTest

Ranking in Mainframe Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Mainframe Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 22.1%, down from 31.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InterTest is 12.3%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	22.1%
InterTest	12.3%
Other	65.6%

Mainframe Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Abulfazal Irfan

Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Tight deployment controls have secured production and simplified complex release rollbacks

The best feature of BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline that impresses me is the fallback functionality. The fallback functionality impresses me because when developers deploy large releases involving multiple components, such as COBOL programs, underlying copy books, and CICS modules, backing out changes would typically become a nightmare. With ISPW, developers can back out the entire release or entire package. If they deployed 100 components and want to back out everything, they can do so with one function and back out all components without worrying about backing out each individual component. They can back out the entire deployment set, which handles everything and brings them back to the previous versions. Developers can also selectively back out a subset of the deployed components. They also have the ability to revert to not just the most previous version but can go back several versions if they choose to do so. This gives them a lot of flexibility.

Read full review

it_user860787

Senior Systems Programmer at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

Helps programmers verify changes, identify any kind of logic mistakes, more quickly

The line by line debugger of program logic for COBOL programs. It allows you to do as much testing as you're required to do, to pretty much guarantee that when a program goes into production it's as error-free as possible. None of them are completely ever free, but as error free as possible.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think the most valuable features are code management, code deployment, and code generation. The fact that those three features are included makes BMC Compuware ISPW a robust product. If one of those features was missing, it would be less robust and less interesting. But because it has those three features, it is a very good solution for code development and management."

"The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change."

"I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I."

"The smart editor helps because it will code-complete for me. I can see code working a lot faster and I'm able to get things coded in less time."

"It speeds up processes, makes things easier, more efficient, and from a mainframe perspective, the way the mainframe is utilized has become that much easier."

"We had parallel development before, but the way ISPW implements it is better. It has more control and oversight of the process, whereas before, it was like the Wild West. Everybody could have their own package with their own version of the component in it... ISPW is constantly aware of it. It notifies when someone else is using or has a different version of that component."

"One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing."

"My guess is this would have taken twice as long, or we would have had many more issues without using Xpediter."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"The line by line debugger of program logic for COBOL programs allows you to do as much testing as you're required to do, to pretty much guarantee that when a program goes into production it's as error-free as possible."

"Programmers can verify their changes more quickly, identify any kind of logic mistakes in the program more quickly."

"InterTest is also bundled with SymDump. We see this as a bundle. They are always together for us. So InterTest is used for debugging process, walking through the code, checking data conditions and code flow. SymDump is used for the fact, after a problem occurs. SymDump catches what point in time the problem occurred, all the other connecting data, and points us to the code to indicate what caused the situation."

"CA has done a fantastic job with this product, all the time."

Cons

"I find it more cumbersome to use Topaz."

"Topaz Workbench often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"

"It often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"Their technical support could be better."

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

"It's a very complicated tool."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"You can have as many users as you like using it. However, sometimes they'll "step on each other" if there are two applications that are testing in one particular region, one could cause some type of a storage overlay and that will hamper another customer trying to do something in the same region."

"Still, it's not a quick and easy product. You have to follow several steps to get through the installation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"The price point is great."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Insurance Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Insurance Company

23%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

I don't directly deal with the pricing side of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

It's a very complicated tool. Sometimes the customer wants better, faster transaction times. They want the solution to move as fast as possible. We're trying to scale and grow our application with ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

We do development for our customers and we use Topaz to do backend systems for some Latin American banks. It's for enterprise data. It runs on AWS. I'm working on performance testing to do batch pe...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 9% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Rocket Enterprise Developer (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

IBM Debug for z/OS vs InterTest

Compared 16% of the time

IBM File Manager vs InterTest

Compared 13% of the time

BMC AMI DevX Performance Test vs InterTest

Compared 13% of the time

File Master Plus vs InterTest

Compared 10% of the time

SymDump vs InterTest

Compared 8% of the time

More InterTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

May 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

April 2026

Download InterTest product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA InterTest, CA InterTest for CICS, CA InterTest for Batch

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

InterTest offers a dynamic mainframe testing solution, ensuring efficient and reliable software quality assurance for essential corporate systems.

InterTest is tailored for mainframe environments, providing robust capabilities that streamline the software testing process. It reduces time spent on debugging and increases productivity through its automated batch and interactive testing features. Designed for knowledgeable professionals, it enhances system performance by catching errors earlier and more efficiently. The solution integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, making it an invaluable asset for maintaining high code quality.

What are the standout features of InterTest?

Automated Testing: Streamlines processes, reducing manual intervention.
Debugging Tools: Identifies and resolves errors promptly.
Batch Testing: Ensures comprehensive evaluation of large data sets.
Interactive Testing: Enhances user engagement with real-time testing capabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time and costs.
Error Reduction: Minimizes the risk of system failures through early detection.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrates effortlessly with existing systems to simplify processes.
Increased Productivity: Allows teams to focus on innovation rather than troubleshooting.

In industries reliant on mainframes, such as finance and healthcare, InterTest is critical in safeguarding data integrity and operational continuity. Its advanced testing capabilities ensure systems remain robust and secure, even as demands evolve. Implementation is smooth, with consistent performance improvements noted across different sectors by deploying this tool.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

Blue Hill Data Services

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

April 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. InterTest report.

See our list of best Mainframe Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.