No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BMC AMI DevX vs Broadcom Test Data Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
BMC AMI DevX boosts efficiency by improving documentation, reducing development time by 30%, and protecting organizational investments.
Sentiment score
6.1
Broadcom Test Data Manager significantly saves time and money, enhancing testing efficiency, despite lengthy initial deployment and training phases.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
BMC AMI DevX customer service is praised for responsiveness and problem-solving with generally high satisfaction ratings.
Sentiment score
6.4
Broadcom Test Data Manager's customer service is praised for being responsive, knowledgeable, and maintaining efficient, proactive communication.
BMC AMI DevX's technical support responds very well and takes all cases seriously.
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Every time I open a case, I get an immediate response.
Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
BMC AMI DevX is scalable, effectively managing diverse setups with robust capabilities, requiring specific configurations for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.2
Broadcom Test Data Manager effectively scales across platforms, with noted flexibility and some speed challenges handling large datasets.
If someone is in India, another country, or another state in the United States and wants to use it, they have to use it on SysB and all log into that.
Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
BMC AMI DevX is absolutely scalable.
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
BMC AMI DevX is stable post-configuration, despite occasional initial issues and challenges with integration or new releases.
Sentiment score
7.4
Broadcom Test Data Manager is stable and efficient, with rapid support for minor bugs and generally high user ratings.
I would rate BMC AMI DevX as a stable solution that I have been using for years and find working fine.
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
 

Room For Improvement

BMC AMI DevX users desire better integration, documentation, testing tools, pricing, UI, Eclipse compatibility, support, and cloud/AI integration.
Broadcom Test Data Manager needs improved integration, performance, and UI along with enhanced scalability, security, and data visualization features.
I have to put my cursor on the field and tap it to bring focus there, or use the tab key multiple times to get to a field on the screen.
Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
To improve BMC AMI DevX, consideration should be given to cloud-style provisioning and development models, as well as integration of more AI capabilities.
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

BMC AMI DevX users prefer seat-based licensing for cost-effectiveness, with Topaz's integration enhancing investment value despite licensing challenges.
Broadcom Test Data Manager's flexible licensing competes with IBM, may be cost-effective, but pricing varies based on usage and needs.
 

Valuable Features

BMC AMI DevX enhances productivity with debugging, code management, easy GUIs, data tools, and supports modern development environments.
Broadcom Test Data Manager excels in synthetic data generation, masking, and subsetting, enhancing compliance, efficiency, and cost savings.
The CI/CD offering allows integration of quality checks and unit test processes into the pipeline, which improves compliance and enhances productivity, enabling developers to focus on development while the pipeline automates integration.
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
With ISPW, developers can back out the entire release or entire package.
Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX
Ranking in Test Data Management
5th
Ranking in Data Masking
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (4th), Database Development and Management (16th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), AI Software Development (202nd)
Broadcom Test Data Manager
Ranking in Test Data Management
3rd
Ranking in Data Masking
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
AI Synthetic Data (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Test Data Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 12.2%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Broadcom Test Data Manager is 13.9%, down from 17.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Data Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Test Data Manager13.9%
BMC AMI DevX12.2%
Other73.9%
Test Data Management
 

Featured Reviews

FI
Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Tight deployment controls have secured production and simplified complex release rollbacks
The best feature of BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline that impresses me is the fallback functionality. The fallback functionality impresses me because when developers deploy large releases involving multiple components, such as COBOL programs, underlying copy books, and CICS modules, backing out changes would typically become a nightmare. With ISPW, developers can back out the entire release or entire package. If they deployed 100 components and want to back out everything, they can do so with one function and back out all components without worrying about backing out each individual component. They can back out the entire deployment set, which handles everything and brings them back to the previous versions. Developers can also selectively back out a subset of the deployed components. They also have the ability to revert to not just the most previous version but can go back several versions if they choose to do so. This gives them a lot of flexibility.
Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone
Offers great utility with synthetic data generation and reliable technical support
Overall, this can definitely be the advantage of the product, and I'm happy with these functionalities that Broadcom provides. I totally recommend any application working on the database layer directly and I don't recommend any applications from other external vendors to perform the same function. Oracle and PostgreSQL have similar applications and they both work directly in the database, reading directly from the database, transforming values in another table within the same database, making it easy to run. The solution is saving me time and money in general because this application saves money and a lot of effort. I can generate any amount of data from Broadcom Test Data Manager, which has a lot of information and equations regarding this task. It saves money because my testing team needs this data to create use cases tested on realistic data. Broadcom Test Data Manager adds great value to my organization, but I believe it can be afforded only in international, large-sized companies. It is not affordable for medium or small-sized organizations.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
32%
Insurance Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Construction Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise30
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?
To improve BMC AMI DevX, consideration should be given to cloud-style provisioning and development models, as well as integration of more AI capabilities. Enhancements in VS Code extensions to deve...
What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?
BMC AMI DevX solutions are primarily used for mainframe-based resources and application development, encompassing not only COBOL but also Workbench and VS Code for various purposes. Data management...
What needs improvement with Broadcom Test Data Manager?
In terms of areas for improvement in Broadcom Test Data Manager specifically, I recognize that building the ERD diagram after connecting to the database is very difficult and requires improvement e...
What is your primary use case for Broadcom Test Data Manager?
When it comes to use cases for Broadcom Test Data Manager, clients may use it for data masking. From a service provider perspective, regarding the data masking, data subsetting, and data virtualiza...
What advice do you have for others considering Broadcom Test Data Manager?
If I were to rate their support from one to ten, I would give them a ten. Let's divide the question about Broadcom's standing compared to other vendors. If we talk about Oracle, PostgreSQL, or any ...
 

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline
CA Test Data Manager, DataMaker, DataFinder, Fast Data Masker, CA TDM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari 
Manheim, Arag
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. Broadcom Test Data Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.