Board vs Planful comparison

Board International and Planful are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Board International is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Planful is ranked #15. Board International holds a 6.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to Planful’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Board International users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planful users who would recommend it.

Board

Read 37 Board reviews

1,066 Views
720 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Planful

Read 2 Planful reviews

682 Views
344 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Board

Planful

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Board and Planful are competing solutions in the financial planning and analytics space. Board seems to have the upper hand due to its robust data analytics and forecasting capabilities.

Features: Board provides integrated business intelligence, advanced forecasting abilities, and comprehensive data analytics features. Planful focuses on streamlined budgeting cycles, efficient financial consolidations, and user-friendly budgeting management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Board presents a flexible deployment model supported by a robust system, requiring technical expertise. Planful offers a simpler user setup but could benefit from improvements in customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Board's higher initial setup cost matches its advanced analysis capabilities, while Planful's pricing aligns with a quicker return on investment, appealing to budget-focused users. No specific pricing details available.

To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. Planful Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Planful

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Board

Ranking in Business Performance Management

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (21st), Reporting (18th)

Planful

Ranking in Business Performance Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Financial Close Software (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Board is 6.7%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planful is 2.8%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Wiboon Thabsuwan

Senior Consultant at IMD Company Limited

Easy to use and requires less time to learn or understand its features

I think the product is good in terms of ease of use. The interface looks really nice and very easy to use. Every command appears in the icon. It looks like you don't have to understand everything about the command. You do not necessarily have to know more, or I would say that there is less time for our study about the products. Functionality-wise, it is quite easy to use and requires less time to understand or learn about the product. I am a software vendor, so I do not use the tool myself. I use it for my clients. My clients mostly use it for budgeting and timing purposes. I would say that's really less maintenance at all because they can do everything by themselves. It is good in terms of ease of use.

Read full review

reviewer1110591

Financial Planning & Analysis - Finance Manager at a engineering company with 501-1,000 employees

It has helped us speed up the turnaround time on our consolidation, and we haven't had anything come up that the program has not been able to solve

The part that we liked about Excel is that it had a better interface in terms of just graphical illustration of our results. So, if we wanted to look at our financial trends and put it into some type of graphical interface for people to look at, we still have to leverage Excel for that. The dashboards aren't as usable as maybe some of the other solutions, such as Tableau or other BI tools. The application that we use today for our BI tools is Tableau. That's how people absorb information. We don't really use the functionality or dashboards within Planful because of the robustness of Tableau. That's our single source of data. If Planful was better or more comparable in terms of features and functionality, we could probably leverage that in Planful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All the reports are prepared automatically."

"It has definitely saved us time, especially in our budget and planning processes."

"It is easy to make quick updates. As the business changes, we can maintain the tool without programming help from IT."

"What is very valuable is the ability to customize. We didn't see a solution out there that really matched exactly what our functional requirements would be. So we were able to work with New Brain, our integrator, and we were able to build from the ground up what we wanted, and I think that's pretty unique to BOARD."

"The reporting part has been very valuable as the capabilities of the tool do not have to change graphs, change how grids are displayed, and can create reports on the fly."

"The dynamic selections on the screen and details by function are also valuable for inside the data view."

"The ease of being able to get the data into BOARD is what makes it nice for people with a semi-IT background."

"I think it's flexible. I chose this solution because, even though it wasn't out-of-the-box, you can customize it, and the long-term growth potential of the software is where I see the value."

More Board pros

"It has helped us speed up the turnaround time on our consolidation. We don't have to do reporting in Excel anymore, which has cut down on the errors and the efficiency of our close time."

Cons

"The one thing that I think we would like to see in terms of improvement of the application is the ability to print. It's fantastic to have all of these graphic visualization of data, but we're not able to very easily just print... From my perspective, if you can have a little "print" button and then you just click it and it would produce what's on the screen, that would be very helpful."

"My analysts have used the technical support. Sometimes they have felt like they did not receive the answer that they needed, or you have to go and upgrade in order to address a problem. "

"It needs more export to Excel functionality. Right now, we're having to build within the cloud-based platform, as well as build within the Excel add-in, because the export to Excel is somewhat ugly."

"Building similar models entirely from scratch could be made quicker with transfer abilities between databases and capsules."

"The setup was a bit complex."

"Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance."

"One of the things that I would like to see is the ability to have a rule directly referenced on the cubes."

"We can't delete entities and cubes in Boards because it interrupts our whole data model."

More Board cons

"The part that we liked about Excel is that it had a better interface in terms of just graphical illustration of our results. So, if we wanted to look at our financial trends and put it into some type of graphical interface for people to look at, we still have to leverage Excel for that. The dashboards aren't as usable as maybe some of the other solutions, such as Tableau or other BI tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."

"It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."

"Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."

"The tool's price is a bit high compared to other solutions."

"In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."

"Right now, everything is on a three-year term contract, and that is our main cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?

We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and simu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Board?

All the reports are prepared automatically.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Board?

Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Anaplan vs Board

Compared 30% of the time

Pigment vs Board

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Board

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs Board

Compared 9% of the time

More Board Competitors

Adaptive Insights vs Planful

Compared 24% of the time

Anaplan vs Planful

Compared 23% of the time

Jedox vs Planful

Compared 22% of the time

Pigment vs Planful

Compared 18% of the time

More Planful Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Board

June 2025

Download Board product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Performance Management

June 2025

Download Planful product report

Also Known As

No data available

Host Analytics

Overview

BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

Board International

You need a financial planning solution that meets the structured demands of standardized financial planning and reporting requirements and regulations. Structured Planning with Planful automates labor-intensive planning activities in a complete cloud-based platform – giving your finance team control, consistency, and confidence in corporate financial plans.

Planful

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB

Tandem Diabetes Care, Reed Exhibitions, SkyGolf, Zep Inc., Thule, Stylesight, Schumacher Group, Parsons Electric, Nextag, Groupon

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Planful

June 2025

Free Report: Board vs. Planful

Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. Planful and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Board vs. Planful report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.