No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bright vs Q-mast comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bright
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
48th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (15th)
Q-mast
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
53rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Bright is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Q-mast is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Bright0.6%
Q-mast0.5%
Other98.9%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

NexPloit, NexDast
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Britannica, Shufersal, Qualitest, PremFina, playtech, Phoenix
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.