No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs Forter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
25th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Forter
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Forter is 3.6%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Forter3.6%
Broadcom Payment Security1.2%
Other95.2%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
reviewer1460475 - PeerSpot reviewer
Center Lead Developer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Great at detecting fraudulent behavior and has reduced our financial losses
This solution is scalable. You can add more users onto it because they raise the level depending on the traffic that you give them. For instance, if I'm going to send 1,000 evaluations every minute and then 10,000 evaluations every minute, the solution needs to be able to adjust. For them, it was quite easy to scale. I was using this solution in a team of seven people. Maintenance was also carried out by the team. We worked with tickets and when we saw that there was a new version or we needed changes that required integration, anyone working on the team could do it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is a good product, which is easy to deploy and has lot of user friendly features."
"We see a high value in that, with all the fraud rules that we built, we have a very good false positive ratio because of the big data that CA has."
"They are excellent."
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"I think stability-wise, we've not really had any issues in terms of stability."
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."
"Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."
 

Cons

"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"This is the one area where there's room for improvement. I think that is the one area where improvements can be made in terms of speed of response, in terms of quality of response, and in terms of more so a proactive problem monitoring."
"At the moment, getting into that rich data is quite an effort."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"An area of improvement for this product would be the ability to view more transactional data to determine the cause of a failed transaction."
"I would like to see more granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."
"Lacking granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
15%
Retailer
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Kiwi.com, Fiverr, James Allen
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.