No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs ThreatMetrix comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ThreatMetrix
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatMetrix is 4.4%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ThreatMetrix4.4%
Broadcom Payment Security1.9%
Other93.7%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
Sohom Roy - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director at CSS Corp
Enables to identify and analyze real-time incidents and mitigate risks
The setup is not complex. It is pretty standard. I rate the ease of setup a nine out of ten. The deployment time depends on the applications and environment into which we integrate it. The product provides a lot of API documentation. The product is cloud-based. One or two people are enough to deploy the solution. We need some maintenance when new versions or patches need to be upgraded. It requires minimal maintenance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"So it's pretty useful operation wise, and also in terms of some inquiries from us, if a customer is disputing they didn't receive an OTP password on their online transaction, and then they're disputing that it's not theirs, and it's unauthorized, but it was a successful transaction, I use this product to see the customer's previous IP addresses."
"It's the security and protection it offers our customers."
"We see a high value in that, with all the fraud rules that we built, we have a very good false positive ratio because of the big data that CA has."
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"The CA solution is a world-class product and others should consider using this solution."
"They are excellent."
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"It is a stable solution."
"The solution can be easily integrated with applications."
"The user interface, the portal, is very helpful in describing what attributes of concern are associated with the device."
"Accessible custom rules with a monthly update on performance."
"The fact that we were able to much more easily detect if people were using VPN for travels, which country they were accessing the platform from, and we had access to a large amount of new data points that we previously didn't have was really useful for us."
"The most valuable feature the solution has is that it is able to do a fairly accurate fraud assessment of a credit card transaction, and the rules used in fraud scoring can be based on many transaction attributes such as purchased IP address (country), amount, email address, etc., with scoring rules configured by the merchant."
"There is excellent documentation available."
"The clients do get a return on their investment; it mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms."
 

Cons

"Sometimes, there is a bit of language issue of understanding problems."
"This is the one area where there's room for improvement. I think that is the one area where improvements can be made in terms of speed of response, in terms of quality of response, and in terms of more so a proactive problem monitoring."
"An area of improvement for this product would be the ability to view more transactional data to determine the cause of a failed transaction."
"The deployment process needs to be updated to ensure the base code does not involve details of other clients."
"Their response time was amazing, but it took a lot of time and the responses that we got were not really satisfactory, so it took a lot of time and alterations to get something fixed, which should have been fixed much earlier."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"That's the one complaint we have had is the lack of mobile signal."
"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."
"One limitation is it only maintains six months' worth of data. It would be nice if it went back even further to help us really identify and flush out patterns that go on longer."
"The tool is very expensive."
"We are only using one feature. We haven't found the other features to be very good or very powerful."
"SDK is probably where the biggest issue is. The SDK configuration is a bit lacking, and if you are integrating it into your workflow, it is very cumbersome and very difficult to integrate."
"We encountered a few issues with API calls to the solution."
"The pricing could be lower. We are a young company; maybe for big enterprises, price doesn't matter, however, for young companies, price-wise, it's not that good; it's a bit pricey."
"Could be more intuitive and user friendly."
"It would be useful if they could offer real-time processing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"I am not aware of the price. I have always come in after it has been negotiated. The clients do get a return on their investment. It mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms. They have definitely got their ROI back because there is continued investment in ThreatMetrix over time."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Construction Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
36%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise4
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Trip Advisor, Stone Hub, TD Bank, Rabobank, GoPro
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. ThreatMetrix and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.