No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) comparison

Broadcom and Rocket Software are both solutions in the Software Configuration Management category. Broadcom is ranked #10, while Rocket Software is ranked #6. Broadcom holds a 3.2% mindshare in SCM, compared to Rocket Software’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rocket Software users who would recommend it.
CA Harvest Software Change ...
Read 6 CA Harvest Software Change Manager reviews
  • 623 Views
  • 492 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (forme...
Read 3 Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) reviews
  • 1,019 Views
  • 1,019 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CA Harvest Software Change Manager and Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Software Configuration Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Report (Updated: August 2026).
Buyer's Guide
CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
August 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Harvest Software Change ...
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
10th
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (forme...
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of CA Harvest Software Change Manager is 3.2%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) is 9.1%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)9.1%
CA Harvest Software Change Manager3.2%
Other87.7%
Software Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user572910 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user572910
Sr. Configuration Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Has helped us track the application flow across each of our environments, promotion from dev to our higher environments, to production.
One feature that we are looking for is traceability, and also merging. That is a little cumbersome right now. We have provided our feedback to their representatives so they can provide us a good merging capability next time. One thing that I would like to improve is making the tool a little more user friendly. It takes a little bit of time to adjust to the tool because it's a little different than other version control tools out there in the market. But, it has its own benefits and own security, but that user experience, if they're going to improve it, that would be really great.
Read full review
reviewer1527093 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1527093
Development Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Very flexible with Johnny-on-the-spot tech support
I would like to see them enable parallel development for online. It's available now for batch stuff on the mainframe. Jenkins, IBM, and Rocket all supposedly already have safe and workable version of Git for the mainframe. With that in mind, we need to know where our feature is. Unfortunately, as good as ChangeMan is, if we're listing downfalls, they should be talking to me about this. Not me having to go talk to them about it. Hopefully, they have this in the works and they are positioning their product for the future. That's just a straightforward comment. It really comes down to whether they are complacent or not. The other thing that should improve is cost. Git, even on the mainframe, a large part of the components "free". They're the way you set them up yourselves and they're self-sustaining and built into the infrastructure. You can't charge me for that. I gave ChangeMan an overall score of eight, but what could drive them to a nine is coming up with a way for all my code that belongs together to be tracked and moved together. Everything should move based upon the mainframe; it needs to be alerted and synchronized.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to give our teams functionality from a control perspective, allowing them to decide how they want to implement the tool, is valuable."
"The most valuable feature I would say is we can integrate that with our change management process and use that to control what goes into production and what doesn't."
"Using this solution, we were able to implement a full process for all of our lifecycles."
"I have not encountered any stability issues."
"The auditing capability is one aspect that I would really recommend other colleagues to look into, because all the other version control tools out in the market provide speed, but the auditing capability is missing; the change management interaction; etc."
"CA Mainframe Software Manager (CA Harvest SCM) provides a great way for us to store our source control."
"We audit once a year for our ChangeMan access, accurate financial programs, and all of that. Auditors really love ChangeMan for how easy it is to get through and how tight the security is on it. Our internal auditors, external auditors, and SOX editors love this solution. We're in the healthcare business, so HIPAA regulations and all such things are a big deal, and this makes all that really simple."
"Auditors really love ChangeMan for how easy it is to get through and how tight the security is on it."
"Scalability is great. It has absolutely met every need for us so far. We do have some concurrent development paths and we're able to flexibly assign variables. At the same time, our skeletons assemble where we want them to, so the scalability is very good."
"What’s most valuable to me is the ability to compile the code and move it through the test and productions environments."
 

Cons

"Security features can be improved."
"Technical support for this solution is very good, although they can still use improvement in some regards."
"The features don’t always work as advertised."
"One feature that we are looking for is traceability, and also merging. That is a little cumbersome right now."
"When you're trying to do collaboration or when you're trying to cater to multiple users and developers who submit code changes, it gets challenging with Harvest."
"It needs to be simpler. This is the most difficult SCM tool I’ve ever used."
"Password complexity is not enforced by the tool."
"I would like to see a better search tool."
"Their technical support is not so good. To be perfectly honest, that's one of the reasons we were looking at other solutions."
"I would like to see them enable parallel development for online. It's available now for batch stuff on the mainframe. Jenkins, IBM, and Rocket all supposedly already have safe and workable version of Git for the mainframe. With that in mind, we need to know where our feature is."
"As such, there's nothing wrong with the product. It is great, but there are small things that can be better to make it much more friendly. The way you navigate through fields can be improved. If I'm going to stage a component over something that exists and that I've created in another library, and I want to pull it in and write it over what I've got there in my package, I've got to type in that data set name every time. That can be aggravating. It is not a big deal. The way things are sorted can also be improved. If you're doing a delete of a bunch of components, you can't sort those out by type or anything. Some things are just standard, and you can't look at them in a way that would be helpful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Once you purchase your licenses, there is maintenance support that is renewed every year."
"It's on a yearly basis. I am not aware of any additional costs."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Insurance Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Non Profit
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

Endevor vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager Logo
Endevor vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager
Compared 35% of the time
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager Logo
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager
Compared 26% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps Server vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps Server vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager
Compared 23% of the time
BMC Helix Client Management vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager Logo
BMC Helix Client Management vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager
Compared 17% of the time
More CA Harvest Software Change Manager Competitors
Endevor vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
Endevor vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 24% of the time
BMC AMI DevX vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
BMC AMI DevX vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 20% of the time
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 17% of the time
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 12% of the time
OpenText Solutions Business Manager vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
OpenText Solutions Business Manager vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 7% of the time
More Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CA Harvest Software Change Manager
August 2026
CA Harvest Software Change Manager reportDownload CA Harvest Software Change Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Software Configuration Management
July 2026
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) reportDownload Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) product report
 

Also Known As

CA Harvest SCM, CA Software Change Manager
Open Text, Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF
 

Overview

CA Harvest Software Change Manager offers comprehensive change management for software development projects, providing a robust infrastructure for version control and collaborative work.

CA Harvest Software Change Manager simplifies the complexities of managing changes in software development. It supports various lifecycle stages and promotes efficient collaboration through version control, fostering teamwork and improving code quality. Built for environments that require reliable change management, it facilitates seamless integration with other tools, enhancing the overall development process.

What are the key features of CA Harvest Software Change Manager?
  • Version Control: Manages multiple versions of software projects, allowing teams to track changes effectively.
  • Automated Processes: Reduces manual tasks and accelerates the deployment timeline with automation.
  • Integration: Easily integrates with other development tools to streamline workflows.
  • Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork by providing tools that support shared access to codebases.
What benefits can users expect to see from CA Harvest Software Change Manager?
  • Improved Efficiency: Automating repetitive tasks saves time and reduces errors.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better communication and collaboration among team members.
  • Risk Mitigation: Reduces risks associated with software changes through controlled processes.
  • Reduced Time to Market: Speeds up the development process, enabling faster delivery of updates.

CA Harvest Software Change Manager is widely implemented in industries requiring meticulous change management in software services, like finance and healthcare, where data integrity and compliance are crucial. It supports the specific needs of these sectors by providing secure and reliable version control, ensuring that software changes are tracked accurately and systematically.

Broadcom

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF, formerly a Micro Focus product, is an enterprise-grade software change management solution designed to streamline and secure software development and deployment processes.

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF offers comprehensive features that cater to the needs of experienced IT professionals. Its robust capabilities ensure precise version control, secure change tracking, and seamless software lifecycle management. Highly regarded for its reliability and depth, it enhances team collaboration and process efficiency to meet visible demands effectively. It stands out in environments requiring strict adherence to change management protocols.

What are the Valuable Features of Rocket ChangeMan ZMF?
  • Version Control: Provides precise tracking and management of software versions.
  • Change Tracking: Ensures secure recording and visibility into all changes made.
  • Lifecycle Management: Facilitates full software lifecycle management from development to release.
  • Secure Deployment: Guarantees secure and controlled software deployment processes.
What ROI and Benefits to Look for in Reviews?
  • Process Efficiency: Improves overall efficiency in development and deployment.
  • Cost Savings: Reduces costs by streamlining processes and minimizing errors.
  • Collaboration Enhancement: Fosters better communication and collaboration among teams.
  • Compliance Support: Aids in maintaining compliance with industry standards.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, where software stability and compliance are crucial, implementing Rocket ChangeMan ZMF can lead to significant improvements in managing complex software environments. Its industry-tailored features support critical operations seamlessly while adhering to strict regulatory requirements.

Rocket Software
 

Sample Customers

State of New Hampshire, Blue Hill
SPTS Technologies, Generali France, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH), Kutxa-Vital-Banco Madrid, Space and Naval Warfare Information Technology Center (SPAWAR ITC)
Buyer's Guide
CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
August 2026
Free Report: CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) report.
See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.