CentraSite vs webMethods.io comparison

"The governance is powerful, and you can look up services very easily, which may reduce some development cycle time."

"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."

"With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively."

"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."

"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."

"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."

"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."

"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."

"The setup is mild. It's not so simple and not very difficult. You can make it happen with some configuration, but it's not easy for non-professional people."

"The configuring of the JWT token would be improved as it is a confusing process. We require more information on this part of the solution."

"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."

"With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved."

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."

"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."

"The licensing cost is high compared to other options."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."