Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Chariot vs CyberProof comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Chariot
Ranking in Penetration Testing Services
25th
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (14th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (44th)
CyberProof
Ranking in Penetration Testing Services
20th
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (12th), Vulnerability Management (79th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (45th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Penetration Testing Services category, the mindshare of Chariot is 1.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberProof is 1.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Penetration Testing Services Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CyberProof1.3%
Chariot1.3%
Other97.4%
Penetration Testing Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Horizon3.ai, HackerOne, Bugcrowd and others in Penetration Testing Services. Updated: January 2026.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
UST Global
Find out what your peers are saying about Horizon3.ai, HackerOne, Bugcrowd and others in Penetration Testing Services. Updated: January 2026.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.