

Cisco IOS Security and Check Point IPS compete in the network security category, where Check Point IPS seems to have an upper hand due to its extensive attack vector database and automatic update features.
Features: Cisco IOS Security focuses on network scalability, intrusion detection, and mobile device integration. It excels in VPN setup management with advanced IP services and provides extensive network security options. Check Point IPS is known for its comprehensive protection profiles that cater to different threat levels, a vast attack vector database, and ease of configuration with automatic updates.
Room for Improvement: Cisco IOS Security can benefit from improved user interfaces, simpler configurations, and easier license management. It would also be advantageous for Cisco IOS to lower its pricing and enhance built-in security features. Check Point IPS can improve by reducing performance impacts when the IPS module is active, addressing false positive issues, and providing better support and documentation, especially given the high cost associated with the solution.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS Security offers strong support infrastructure and can be used in various environments, including hybrid and public clouds, though it suffers from long response times and variable service quality. Check Point IPS supports deployment across on-premises and cloud models with some noted support challenges. Users have praised Check Point IPS for its straightforward deployment, especially when bundled with other services, though the support response is often criticized for being slow and isolated in expertise.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS Security is seen as costly, particularly for smaller organizations, but many users find value in its robust features and security capabilities, yielding a favorable return on investment. Check Point IPS also demands a high price, though bundling options may offer financial benefits. Licensing flexibility allows users to choose between annual or longer-term agreements, and despite the high costs, both products are valued for their capabilities in enhancing network security and operational efficiency.
I have seen a return on investment as it results in money saved and time saved because the security tool is very complete and modern.
I have seen a return on investment more in the risk saved since it catches a lot of stuff security-wise that is good to catch.
I have seen a return on investment since using Check Point IPS, as evidenced by fewer incidents.
The return on investment is satisfactory with Cisco products as they have long lifespans, and our customers are satisfied with them.
Our technical teams have personal relationships with our account executives and direct support people.
The customer support for Check Point IPS is excellent.
I have had an excellent experience with Check Point IPS's customer team, as their technical knowledge and troubleshooting skills are excellent.
My impression is that the support quality has deteriorated over time.
We have moved to a hyper-scale master environment, allowing us to scale by adding additional gateways to the clusters.
The scalability of Check Point IPS is on point.
The scalability of Check Point IPS is great because when I deploy gateways in the cloud, I create a cluster, which offers a very scalable option.
Check Point IPS provides a very stable and reliable environment.
Check Point IPS is very stable.
Check Point IPS is very stable with no problems regarding this solution.
We find Cisco products stable and thoroughly tested before new software or firmware versions are released.
I find Cisco IOS Security to be a very stable product.
Automated attack path correlation in SmartEvent to improve situational awareness.
At least 60% of all the alarms generated by the IPS are false positives or something that's not important to look at, and this generates a significant workload for my team.
More granular policy customization for Check Point IPS would allow protection to be tailored more precisely to specific applications or services, which would reduce unnecessary overhead and improve accuracy.
Cisco changes their licensing policy quite frequently, which is becoming confusing and complicated.
Comparisons with Fortinet show that Check Point IPS is relatively more expensive, but we found it cheaper to retain it rather than switch.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point IPS is good; it's baked into the firewall licensing, so that's very good.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point IPS is great, and I have no problem with the price.
The cost of Cisco IOS Security for customers is on the higher end of pricing compared to the competition, depending on the targeted customers.
The integration with Check Point ThreatCloud ensures the IPS engine is updated with the latest attack signatures.
The solution employs behavioral heuristic analysis to block zero-day attacks using AI-powered engines.
Whenever any zero-day attack is detected, it downloads that signature into the firewall and prevents that threat.
This solution, called Network Access Controller, handles authentication, authorization, and accounting for devices accessing the network.
The best features of Cisco IOS Security are its integration with software management tools such as Cisco DNA Center and Cisco ICE, which provide centralized policy and network access control.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point IPS | 3.4% |
| Cisco IOS Security | 2.3% |
| Other | 94.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
Check Point IPS provides robust real-time threat prevention by blocking threats before they can harm critical systems, integrating seamlessly with ThreatCloud for enhanced security management and efficiency while minimizing false positives.
Check Point IPS enhances network security through AI-powered behavioral analysis, centralized management, and customizable policies. It ensures strong protection against known and unknown threats, including zero-day attacks, and its integration with ThreatCloud allows for automatic updates, minimizing manual interventions. However, improvements in documentation, support responsiveness, and a more intuitive interface could enhance user experience. Pricing flexibility for cloud environments and quicker signature updates are needed along with better support for high traffic and enhanced visual analytics.
What Are the Key Features of Check Point IPS?Check Point IPS is widely deployed to protect networks from unauthorized access and security threats, ensuring communication channel integrity and preventing exploits. Used across sectors, it aids in compliance with security policies, supporting enterprises in maintaining secure operations.
Cisco IOS Security integrates advanced VPN capabilities, IPsec security, and firewall features, ensuring scalable and reliable protection suitable for enterprise networks.
Cisco IOS Security offers comprehensive firewall integration, robust AAA capabilities, and encryption, empowering organizations with a reliable network environment. EEM provides flexibility and programmability, while integrated threat detection, intrusion prevention, and centralized management enhance its security profile. Despite its reliability, challenges include complexity in configuration, high pricing, and confusing licensing policies. Performance issues and the need for enhanced integration, automation, and better monitoring tools are areas for improvement.
What are the key features of Cisco IOS Security?Industries leverage Cisco IOS Security to protect against zero-day attacks, deploy secure VPNs, and facilitate network access control and compliance checks. Organizations utilize its features for firewalls, routing, and switching, integrating technologies like Cisco ICE and TrustSec to enhance security across enterprise environments.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.