Checkmarx One vs Coverity comparison

Checkmarx and Black Duck are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Black Duck is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Checkmarx holds a 10.6% mindshare in SAST, compared to Black Duck’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

20,789 Views
14,037 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Coverity

Read 42 Coverity reviews

11,969 Views
8,281 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Coverity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Coverity are contenders in the software security field, each with distinct advantages. Checkmarx One appears to have the upper hand in pricing and support satisfaction, indicating cost-effectiveness and customer care.

Features: Checkmarx One's effective integration capabilities, broad language support, and pricing are highlighted as key features. Coverity stands out with its advanced static analysis, precise defect detection, and comprehensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could enhance performance speed, reporting, and specific integration features. Coverity may benefit from improved customizability, interface enhancements, and specific integration improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One is recognized for flexible deployment options and responsive support. Coverity offers strong on-premise solutions but faces complexity in setup, though with professional customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One's competitive pricing and high ROI make it attractive for budget-conscious users. Coverity presents higher initial costs but justifies them with significant ROI from advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Coverity Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Coverity

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.6%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Coverity is 8.0%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Information Security Analyst at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

"It has all the features we need."

"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."

"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."

"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."

"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."

"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."

"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."

More Checkmarx One pros

"We were very comfortable with the initial setup."

"Coverity is easy to use and easy to integrate with CI."

"It help us identify the latest security vulnerabilities."

"The features I find most valuable is that our entire company can publish the analysis results into our central space."

"In my opinion, the most effective Coverity feature for identifying critical vulnerabilities is the extra checks, which offers deep analysis."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Jenkins."

"What I find most effective about Coverity is its low rate of false positives. I've seen other platforms with many false positives, but with Coverity, most vulnerabilities it identifies are genuine. This allows me to focus on real issues."

More Coverity pros

Cons

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."

"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."

"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."

"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."

"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."

"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."

"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Coverity's implementation cycle is very slow when integrating changes, especially for problems related to event handling and memory leaks."

"It would be great if we could customize the rules to focus on critical issues."

"Coverity could improve the ease of use. Sometimes things become difficult and you need to follow the guides from the website but the guides could be better."

"The product lacks sufficient customization options."

"The quality of the code needs improvement."

"Coverity concerns its dashboards and reporting."

"Coverity is not a user-friendly product."

"Sometimes, vulnerabilities remain unidentified even after setting up the rules."

More Coverity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"It is an expensive solution."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

"The solution is affordable."

"It is expensive."

"I would rate Coverity's pricing as a nine out of ten. It's already very expensive, and it's a problem for us to get more licenses due to the price. The pricing model has some good aspects - for example, a personal license gives access to all languages without code limitations, which is better than some competitors. However, it's still a lot of money for us to spend."

"Depending on the usage types, one has to opt for different types of licenses from Coverity, especially to be able to use areas like report viewing or report generation."

"I rate Coverity's price a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"Coverity is quite expensive."

"Coverity’s price is on the higher side. It should be lower."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

33%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 43% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 50% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

CodeSonar vs Coverity

Compared 4% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

March 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

March 2025

Download Coverity product report

Also Known As

No data available

Synopsys Static Analysis

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Coverity

March 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Coverity

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Coverity and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Coverity report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.