Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan Insights comparison

Checkmarx and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Kiuwan is ranked #23. Checkmarx holds a 8.9% mindshare in SCAS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

27,512 Views
2,476 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Kiuwan Insights

Read 2 Kiuwan Insights reviews

482 Views
482 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Kiuwan Insights

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Checkmarx One and Kiuwan Insights compete in application security testing, with each offering distinct advantages. Kiuwan Insights has the upper hand due to its superior feature set, justifying its cost.

Features: Checkmarx One provides a comprehensive static application security testing solution with integration into development processes and robust scanning capabilities. Kiuwan Insights offers a multi-factor analysis approach, in-depth vulnerability management, and adaptability to complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One supports a cloud-based deployment model with quick setup and integration. Its customer service is responsive and helpful. Kiuwan Insights provides cloud deployment with hybrid options, catering to varied infrastructure needs, and offers customized support solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One generally has a lower initial setup cost, leading to favorable ROI over time through efficient integration. Kiuwan Insights requires a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features but delivers substantial ROI by enhancing security posture and offering detailed risk insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (11th), Container Security (13th), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (3rd)

Kiuwan Insights

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

23rd

Average Rating

4.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 8.9%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan Insights is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	8.9%
Kiuwan Insights	1.7%
Other	89.4%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Felix Esteban

Head of Development and Consulting at Logalty

Protects problematic libraries; sorely lacking in customer services

Kiuwan lacks decent support, it's very bad. A couple of years ago an American company bought Kiuwan and support became non-existent. It's a big part of why we're looking to move to another product. We have questions regarding false positives and nobody responds to our tickets. They don't have any answers. If you're looking for a cheaper solution and don't require support, it might be okay, but a large end company that has a lot of questions about how the developers are programming will have trouble.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most important tools in our building process."

"The visibility the solution gives you is great; it really gives you the ability to see what the root issues in the code actually are."

"We are using Checkmarx for analyzing threats."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted the organization, and since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days, saving time and increasing speed to market by reducing the timeline from three or four days to one day only."

"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities, and they are always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database, so I am assured that when I am scanning my product those vulnerabilities are identified at very initial stages, giving my development team more time to react."

"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."

"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."

More Checkmarx One pros

"I have found the interface to be perfect."

"Insights is valuable at protecting a problematic library and enabling you to reduce the number of false positives."

"Can help in reducing the number of false positives."

Cons

"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"Vulnerability details: Reduce false positive results and improve it by providing more details how I can resolve the vulnerability."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it (if more then ~ 30 mb zip file provided - scan is crashes or takes a lot of time)."

"It needs better role management."

"Some were valid and some were not applicable for us based on the scenario."

"There are some downtimes when Checkmarx One is being upgraded to the latest version or some improvement is there."

"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The solution is great, but improvement is needed in the number of lines of code allowed, that is the capacity. Pricing can be improved as well."

"The solution has issues detecting intrusive methods."

"Kiuwan lacks decent support, it's very bad. A couple of years ago an American company bought Kiuwan and support became non-existent."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"Pricing can be improved as well."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 26% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Veracode vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 28% of the time

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 26% of the time

Klocwork vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 12% of the time

PyCharm vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 11% of the time

Mend.io vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 9% of the time

More Kiuwan Insights Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

August 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

August 2026

Download Kiuwan Insights product report

Also Known As

No data available

Insights SCA

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Kiuwan Insights offers cutting-edge security solutions designed to meet the needs of a tech-savvy audience. It empowers organizations to manage vulnerabilities efficiently while ensuring robust protection of software applications.

Kiuwan Insights is a versatile tool that enables IT teams to enhance application security, understand vulnerabilities, and achieve airtight security results. Built with advanced reporting and analytics capabilities, it allows for seamless integration into existing workflows while facilitating real-time risk management and compliance monitoring.

What are the key features of Kiuwan Insights?

Vulnerability Detection: Identifies security gaps in code and recommends fixes.
Code Analysis: Delivers comprehensive insights into code quality and risks.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines and development tools.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Real-Time Reporting: Provides instant analysis and detailed reports for informed decision-making.

What ROI or benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Security: Improved protection against threats and minimized vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlined processes leading to time and cost savings.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures compliance with data security standards.
Enhanced Quality: Better software quality through detailed analysis and reporting.

Implementing Kiuwan Insights in industries such as finance and healthcare allows these sectors to prioritize security due to their sensitive data handling requirements. By adopting its solutions, companies in these industries can significantly forge a pathway to enhanced protection and quality assurance, mitigating risks through tailored security measures.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights

June 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.