Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan Insights comparison

Checkmarx and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Kiuwan is ranked #23. Checkmarx holds a 9.1% mindshare in SCAS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

24,219 Views
2,422 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Kiuwan Insights

Read 2 Kiuwan Insights reviews

410 Views
410 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Kiuwan Insights

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Checkmarx One and Kiuwan Insights compete in application security testing, with each offering distinct advantages. Kiuwan Insights has the upper hand due to its superior feature set, justifying its cost.

Features: Checkmarx One provides a comprehensive static application security testing solution with integration into development processes and robust scanning capabilities. Kiuwan Insights offers a multi-factor analysis approach, in-depth vulnerability management, and adaptability to complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One supports a cloud-based deployment model with quick setup and integration. Its customer service is responsive and helpful. Kiuwan Insights provides cloud deployment with hybrid options, catering to varied infrastructure needs, and offers customized support solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One generally has a lower initial setup cost, leading to favorable ROI over time through efficient integration. Kiuwan Insights requires a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features but delivers substantial ROI by enhancing security posture and offering detailed risk insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (15th), Container Security (14th), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (2nd)

Kiuwan Insights

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

23rd

Average Rating

4.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 9.1%, down from 17.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan Insights is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	9.1%
Kiuwan Insights	1.7%
Other	89.2%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Felix Esteban

Head of Development and Consulting at Logalty

Protects problematic libraries; sorely lacking in customer services

Kiuwan lacks decent support, it's very bad. A couple of years ago an American company bought Kiuwan and support became non-existent. It's a big part of why we're looking to move to another product. We have questions regarding false positives and nobody responds to our tickets. They don't have any answers. If you're looking for a cheaper solution and don't require support, it might be okay, but a large end company that has a lot of questions about how the developers are programming will have trouble.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."

"Initial setup couldn't be any easier; Checkmarx has good documentation on environment requirements, and as long as you meet those, the installation process takes maybe 30 minutes for an initial setup, perhaps a bit longer if you're adding multiple engines."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted the organization, and since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days, saving time and increasing speed to market by reducing the timeline from three or four days to one day only."

"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."

"It has made our organization more efficient with our whole code scan/deployment process for our software applications."

"Checkmarx has helped us deliver more secure products. We are able to do static code analysis with the tool before shipping our code to production. When the integration is in the pipeline, this tool gives us early notifications on code fixes."

"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Can help in reducing the number of false positives."

"Insights is valuable at protecting a problematic library and enabling you to reduce the number of false positives."

"I have found the interface to be perfect."

Cons

"There is nothing particular that I don't like in this solution. It can have more integrations, but the integrations that we would like are in the roadmap anyway, and they just need to deliver the roadmap. What I like about the roadmap is that it is going where it needs to go. If I were to look at the roadmap, there is nothing that is jumping out there that says to me, "Yeah. I'd like something else on the roadmap." What they're looking to deliver is what I would expect and forecast them to deliver."

"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."

"Checkmarx could probably do something to improve their license model."

"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."

"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."

"The Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) feature should be better."

"This solution is not very easily scalable, and seems to lack the capability to manage a high volume of applications."

"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Kiuwan lacks decent support, it's very bad. A couple of years ago an American company bought Kiuwan and support became non-existent."

"The solution is great, but improvement is needed in the number of lines of code allowed, that is the capacity. Pricing can be improved as well."

"The solution has issues detecting intrusive methods."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"It is an expensive solution."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"Pricing can be improved as well."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 32% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Veracode vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 32% of the time

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 28% of the time

PyCharm vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 12% of the time

Klocwork vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 11% of the time

More Kiuwan Insights Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

June 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

May 2026

Download Kiuwan Insights product report

Also Known As

No data available

Insights SCA

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Kiuwan Insights offers cutting-edge security solutions designed to meet the needs of a tech-savvy audience. It empowers organizations to manage vulnerabilities efficiently while ensuring robust protection of software applications.

Kiuwan Insights is a versatile tool that enables IT teams to enhance application security, understand vulnerabilities, and achieve airtight security results. Built with advanced reporting and analytics capabilities, it allows for seamless integration into existing workflows while facilitating real-time risk management and compliance monitoring.

What are the key features of Kiuwan Insights?

Vulnerability Detection: Identifies security gaps in code and recommends fixes.
Code Analysis: Delivers comprehensive insights into code quality and risks.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines and development tools.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Real-Time Reporting: Provides instant analysis and detailed reports for informed decision-making.

What ROI or benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Security: Improved protection against threats and minimized vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlined processes leading to time and cost savings.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures compliance with data security standards.
Enhanced Quality: Better software quality through detailed analysis and reporting.

Implementing Kiuwan Insights in industries such as finance and healthcare allows these sectors to prioritize security due to their sensitive data handling requirements. By adopting its solutions, companies in these industries can significantly forge a pathway to enhanced protection and quality assurance, mitigating risks through tailored security measures.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights

April 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Insights report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.