

Checkmarx One and NGINX App Protect compete in the cybersecurity and application security domain. Checkmarx One seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive code-level analysis capabilities, while NGINX App Protect offers robust application-level protections.
Features: Checkmarx One is recognized for its comprehensive code analysis, vulnerability tracking capabilities, and support for various programming languages. It integrates seamlessly with common version control systems and identifies vulnerabilities in both compiled and uncompiled code. NGINX App Protect excels in providing security with features like reverse proxy capabilities, traffic management, and comprehensive application protection. It offers flexibility in policy configurations.
Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One users note the need to reduce false positive rates, improve role management, and expand language support for emerging languages. Licensing complexity and ease of integration with customized third-party systems are also concerns. NGINX App Protect could improve its automation capabilities, streamline policy settings, and enhance protection against DoS attacks. Better documentation and simplified configuration processes are areas for development.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One provides deployment options in on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments, though customization may require support. Its technical support receives mixed reviews. NGINX App Protect offers flexible deployment and is straightforward for IT teams familiar with command-line configurations. Its customer service is generally well-regarded, and ease of use is noted once configured.
Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is effective but expensive due to its complex licensing structure, offering significant ROI by preventing security breaches. NGINX App Protect also has a premium price but is viewed as cost-effective with a lower total cost of ownership. It provides value through flexibility and competitive pricing within its market. Both solutions offer value, with Checkmarx focusing on development security and NGINX on application protection.
Overall, between the fast scanning, automation, automatic reporting, and easy detection, it has reduced manual effort enough that we did not need an extra reviewer, even as our codebase or team size grew.
Based on my interactions with the clients, I can tell that there is a return on investment because if something is not profitable and it's not helping to save costs or vulnerabilities, clients wouldn't come back to renew their license year after year.
If you raise a support case with Checkmarx, it is handled smoothly.
The customer support team is amazing and they provide on-phone call, email support, and on-website support.
I have relied on Checkmarx One customer support hundreds of times for several things, and Checkmarx One support is very proactive and very responsive.
They were quick and efficient when we had issues.
I would rate the customer support a 9 on a scale of 1 to 10.
Approximately four billion lines of code are being scanned monthly.
Since it is cloud-based, the infrastructure and PaaS, IaaS, and SaaS are taken care of by the cloud marketplace.
Checkmarx One's scalability has changed my organization because the strong collaboration between the development and security team helps us to do things much faster.
The scalability of NGINX App Protect is good and open source at its best.
I would rate the stability of this solution a nine on a scale of 1 to 10 where one is low stability and 10 is high.
Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues.
It is a quality solution, and I would rate its stability as eight out of ten.
Integration into the IDE being used would be beneficial so that code does not need to be uploaded to the website and an IDE-friendly report could be generated.
It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from.
If you can improve the speed optimization, it takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great.
There was more information from F5 regarding hardware requirements and specifications to deploy the service.
For now, I think NGINX App Protect is good, but maybe I would like to see the logging feature added.
The GUI and web GUI configuration could be improved to be easier to manage and use.
For a small team under 50 developers, normal expenses come under 30 to 60K.
Due to the number of years I've implemented Checkmarx One, there are rebates and discounts from the OEM which makes it a lot more profitable.
The pricing should be reasonable, matching what we are paying for.
Since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days.
The best features Checkmarx One offers, over the past years, include broad language and technical support that Checkmarx provides, covering most languages.
Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle.
The most valuable feature is the ability to operate in a DevOps environment and to be configured through API and pipeline by the developers themselves.
Some threats like injection and running scripts, SQL injections, these all get stopped and rejected by the server.
Detecting bots and blocking IPs have proven effective for securing applications.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Checkmarx One | 2.6% |
| NGINX App Protect | 0.6% |
| Other | 96.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.
Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.
What are the key features of Checkmarx One?Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.
NGINX App Protect offers comprehensive security features like auto-learning and bot protection. Its real-time threat detection and ease of integration make it suitable for web and mobile application security across on-premises, cloud, and container environments.
NGINX App Protect stands out with its adaptive machine learning, scalable deployment options, and robust API connectivity, offering Layer 7 DDoS protection and an OWASP-certified WAF. While it supports comprehensive traffic and security management, enhancements in platform integration, automation, and technical support could improve usability. The pricing model and policy management options could also see refinement. Commonly employed in securing web and mobile applications, it addresses threats including OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities and DDoS attacks, while providing seamless integration with Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines.
What are the key features of NGINX App Protect?NGINX App Protect finds broader use in sectors like banking and telecommunications, where it secures high-performance digital infrastructures. Its application spans perimeter security, load balancing, and acts as a reverse proxy in environments necessitating stringent security, high throughput, and robust management. The tool's adaptability facilitates its deployment alongside containers, ensuring compatibility with contemporary development practices.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.