Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway both compete in the VPN market. Cisco IOS SSL VPN stands out for its security features, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway excels in cloud integration.
Features: Cisco IOS SSL VPN offers high security, reliability, and extensive configuration options. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway provides easy integration with Azure services, scalability, and features tailored to cloud environments.
Room for Improvement: Cisco IOS SSL VPN could improve its management interface, logging capabilities, and user-friendliness. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway needs better troubleshooting tools, enhanced network stability, and expanded support for non-Azure services.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS SSL VPN has a complex deployment process but is backed by a highly rated support team. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway offers a straightforward deployment process and adequate support, with users benefiting from extensive documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS SSL VPN is priced higher, with significant setup costs, but some users find the features justifiable. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway has a more affordable pricing structure and a quicker ROI, appealing to businesses invested in the Azure ecosystem.
The solution provides significant cost savings, transitioning expenses from CapEx to OpEx.
We contact support regularly, especially for deployments, and they are very responsive.
When Cisco first took over, it was a bit more difficult to get support, but they now integrate it without differentiating the support for Linksys versus full-blown Cisco switches.
Prioritization of tasks can also be challenging, impacting the timely resolution of problems.
It integrates well with Cisco's ecosystem, providing flexibility and options to connect to diverse environments.
The process was very efficient to scale the solution, which supports a high level of scalability.
Linksys can be fairly stable for easy environments, but in more complex network environments, Cisco is definitely a lot more stable.
Azure VPN Gateway is very stable due to reliance on Microsoft's own network.
There have been issues with operating systems where newer updates cause problems with backward compatibility.
I believe Cisco could support easier configuration and having tools that allow for easier management and configuration.
The instructions on how to integrate P2N and P2S type networks into Azure VPN Gateway could be improved, though it is a constantly evolving process.
For more than one hundred users, it costs about $60 per seat.
The pricing is somewhat high but acceptable, considering it replaces the need for physical network equipment, leading to cost savings.
The price of Azure VPN Gateway should be rated five from a purely invoice aspect.
The solution is also very scalable, offering up to one hundred licenses for free, and can integrate well with Cisco's ecosystem, such as Cisco ISE and NAC.
The best feature of Linksys in my opinion is cost, as they tend to be more cost-effective compared to larger switches or Cisco switches.
It's cost-effective by eliminating the need for firewall and networking equipment purchases.
The primary function of Azure VPN Gateway allows for designing subnets from existing networks, whether they are physical or virtual networks within Azure or other cloud instances.
A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.